Facebook battle: who's right and who's wrong? Forum
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:29 pm
- Heartford
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:02 pm
Re: Facebook battle: who's right and who's wrong?
The Ninth Circuit is right. They weren't aware of the value of the shares when they settled? Please. And even if they weren't, when there are two sophisticated parties involved in a negotiation like this, and Zuckerberg says "dude, you KNOW this stock is going to be worth (4x as much as reality)", it's not unconscionable- it's just bargaining strategy.
Last edited by Heartford on Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: Facebook battle: who's right and who's wrong?
Im so fuckin tired of the Winklevosses bitching and moaning. Fuck those guys
- Heartford
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:02 pm
Re: Facebook battle: who's right and who's wrong?
+1. As much as we all like to think of Zuckerberg as an evil billionaire, his is basically a cinderella story, at least as compared to the Winklevosses. I mean, at least the skinny nerd ended up on top of the world, instead of just being a programmer hired by two... Winklevosses.dr123 wrote:Im so fuckin tired of the Winklevosses bitching and moaning. Fuck those guys
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: Facebook battle: who's right and who's wrong?
This pretty much says it all, imo...the Winklevosses had access to a bevy of highly paid lawyers, including their father who is an expert in valuation, to help them negotiate a favourable settlement.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- zeth006
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:54 am
Re: Facebook battle: who's right and who's wrong?
FTA:
Code: Select all
“Frankly, I am quite incredulous that they’re continuing to pursue the matter,” he said. “I think they would be a lot happier and wealthier if they would take that money and invest it in their therapist.”
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:29 pm
Re: Facebook battle: who's right and who's wrong?
These two are "sophisticated parties", yeah, what puzzled me is why are they still doing it? And they probably also know Game Theory bla bla... There must be a non-monetary purpose in this... Just a speculation... for now, it seems no one is able to have some healthy supervision over FB or FB seems beyond law (see my other post for evidence).
- Heartford
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:02 pm
Re: Facebook battle: who's right and who's wrong?
Why are they still doing it? This is a dispute over billions of dollars. Why must there be a "non-monetary purpose"? Art thou a troll?knowledgenotebook wrote:These two are "sophisticated parties", yeah, what puzzled me is why are they still doing it? And they probably also know Game Theory bla bla... There must be a non-monetary purpose in this... Just a speculation... for now, it seems no one is able to have some healthy supervision over FB or FB seems beyond law (see my other post for evidence).
[checking post history]
Yeah, you're a troll.