Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
chicoalto0649

Silver
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:34 pm

Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by chicoalto0649 » Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:13 pm

For con law the casebook is Leading Cases in Constitutional Law, Choper, Fallon, Kamisar & Shiffrin

For torts were assigned 2 books:

1. M.A. Franklin, R.L. Rabin, & M.D. Green, Tort Law and Alternatives (2006)

2. J.L. Diamond, L.C. Levine, & A. Bernstein, Understanding Torts (2010)


Any suggestions for civ pro even though we haven't been assigned our casebook.

beach_terror

Platinum
Posts: 7921
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:01 pm

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by beach_terror » Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:39 pm

Unless your torts teacher smokes crack, the torts E&E. Same for Civ Pro (but if you get the Freer book, his hornbook is win).

User avatar
chicoalto0649

Silver
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:34 pm

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by chicoalto0649 » Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:48 pm

beach_terror wrote:Unless your torts teacher smokes crack, the torts E&E. Same for Civ Pro (but if you get the Freer book, his hornbook is win).
naw shes not a doper. her CV is 34 pages long :shock:

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes

Silver
Posts: 1111
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by mikeytwoshoes » Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:54 pm

chicoalto0649 wrote:
beach_terror wrote:Unless your torts teacher smokes crack, the torts E&E. Same for Civ Pro (but if you get the Freer book, his hornbook is win).
naw shes not a doper. her CV is 34 pages long :shock:
What about a thirty-four page CV suggests your prof doesn't smoke crack?

User avatar
chicoalto0649

Silver
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:34 pm

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by chicoalto0649 » Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:56 pm

mikeytwoshoes wrote:
chicoalto0649 wrote:
beach_terror wrote:Unless your torts teacher smokes crack, the torts E&E. Same for Civ Pro (but if you get the Freer book, his hornbook is win).
naw shes not a doper. her CV is 34 pages long :shock:
What about a thirty-four page CV suggests your prof doesn't smoke crack?
can crackheads even count to 34?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Teoeo

Silver
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:21 am

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by Teoeo » Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:58 pm

the Chemerinsky treatise is accepted as the best con law supplement. I've heard Emanuels is good also.

User avatar
traehekat

Gold
Posts: 3188
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by traehekat » Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:40 pm

torts e&e is great. i hear chemerinsky is practically necessary for con law.

User avatar
Amy wineBerry

New
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:10 pm

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by Amy wineBerry » Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:16 pm

I had the same casebook for torts first semester. Get the torts E&E for sure. That and Understanding Torts should get you through. Start working on the E&E early and revisit the sections often.

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes

Silver
Posts: 1111
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by mikeytwoshoes » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:02 pm

chicoalto0649 wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
chicoalto0649 wrote:
beach_terror wrote:Unless your torts teacher smokes crack, the torts E&E. Same for Civ Pro (but if you get the Freer book, his hornbook is win).
naw shes not a doper. her CV is 34 pages long :shock:
What about a thirty-four page CV suggests your prof doesn't smoke crack?
can crackheads even count to 34?
She could have been successful before turning to crack.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


placencia

New
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:54 am

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by placencia » Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:27 pm

Just to help a little, the Gilbert's for Torts was written by the same authors as the Torts book you're using. Sort of.

The main author of the Gilbert's is Cardi, and Green doesn't really do much for the book because he spends his time on the textbook and the Restatements, among other things. But Cardi is a former pupil of Green, and they are best friends.

I used the E & E, for what it's worth, but just because I don't particularly like the style of the Gilbert's book. Also, Green was my prof. So if you are looking for a little closer insight into how the authors think, you may consider Gilbert's.

(just in case you're wondering, Franklin was the original author of both which is why he keeps his name first)

PirateCap'n

Silver
Posts: 747
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:44 pm

Re: Supplements for the following torts/con law casebooks

Post by PirateCap'n » Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:40 pm

placencia wrote:Just to help a little, the Gilbert's for Torts was written by the same authors as the Torts book you're using. Sort of.

The main author of the Gilbert's is Cardi, and Green doesn't really do much for the book because he spends his time on the textbook and the Restatements, among other things. But Cardi is a former pupil of Green, and they are best friends.

I used the E & E, for what it's worth, but just because I don't particularly like the style of the Gilbert's book. Also, Green was my prof. So if you are looking for a little closer insight into how the authors think, you may consider Gilbert's.

(just in case you're wondering, Franklin was the original author of both which is why he keeps his name first)
Agreed. I had Cardi and though that Gilbert's was pretty good. Didn't particularly care for some aspects of the book, but it was pretty effective overall. I liked it significantly more than the E&E FWIW. I thought the E&E spent too much time rambling and not enough time explaining things succinctly, but that's just my personal opinion.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”