Professional Responsibility Question? Forum
- rbgrocio
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:58 pm
Professional Responsibility Question?
When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
- mikeytwoshoes
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm
Re: Professional Responsibility Question?
It's mostly used with 1.11 to avoid imputation of conflicts from former government attorneys to private firms. This rule allows private firms to hire government lawyers without fear of lost profits. Screening is also used where the prohibition is based on 1.9(a) or (b). However, my prof spent no time on this. I think disqualifications based on 1.9(a) or (b) are rather rare.rbgrocio wrote:When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
- rbgrocio
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:58 pm
Re: Professional Responsibility Question?
mikeytwoshoes wrote:It's mostly used with 1.11 to avoid imputation of conflicts from former government attorneys to private firms. This rule allows private firms to hire government lawyers without fear of lost profits. Screening is also used where the prohibition is based on 1.9(a) or (b). However, my prof spent no time on this. I think disqualifications based on 1.9(a) or (b) are rather rare.rbgrocio wrote:When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
Is screening allowed under 1.10?
- mikeytwoshoes
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm
Re: Professional Responsibility Question?
That's where 1.9(a) or (b) comes in. See 1.10(a)(2)(i-iii).rbgrocio wrote:mikeytwoshoes wrote:It's mostly used with 1.11 to avoid imputation of conflicts from former government attorneys to private firms. This rule allows private firms to hire government lawyers without fear of lost profits. Screening is also used where the prohibition is based on 1.9(a) or (b). However, my prof spent no time on this. I think disqualifications based on 1.9(a) or (b) are rather rare.rbgrocio wrote:When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
Is screening allowed under 1.10?
- rbgrocio
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:58 pm
Re: Professional Responsibility Question?
mikeytwoshoes wrote:That's where 1.9(a) or (b) comes in. See 1.10(a)(2)(i-iii).rbgrocio wrote:mikeytwoshoes wrote:It's mostly used with 1.11 to avoid imputation of conflicts from former government attorneys to private firms. This rule allows private firms to hire government lawyers without fear of lost profits. Screening is also used where the prohibition is based on 1.9(a) or (b). However, my prof spent no time on this. I think disqualifications based on 1.9(a) or (b) are rather rare.rbgrocio wrote:When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
Is screening allowed under 1.10?
Ah ok. Thanks!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login