Professional Responsibility Question? Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
rbgrocio

Silver
Posts: 560
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:58 pm

Professional Responsibility Question?

Post by rbgrocio » Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:52 pm

When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes

Silver
Posts: 1111
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Professional Responsibility Question?

Post by mikeytwoshoes » Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:34 pm

rbgrocio wrote:When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
It's mostly used with 1.11 to avoid imputation of conflicts from former government attorneys to private firms. This rule allows private firms to hire government lawyers without fear of lost profits. Screening is also used where the prohibition is based on 1.9(a) or (b). However, my prof spent no time on this. I think disqualifications based on 1.9(a) or (b) are rather rare.

User avatar
rbgrocio

Silver
Posts: 560
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: Professional Responsibility Question?

Post by rbgrocio » Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:41 pm

mikeytwoshoes wrote:
rbgrocio wrote:When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
It's mostly used with 1.11 to avoid imputation of conflicts from former government attorneys to private firms. This rule allows private firms to hire government lawyers without fear of lost profits. Screening is also used where the prohibition is based on 1.9(a) or (b). However, my prof spent no time on this. I think disqualifications based on 1.9(a) or (b) are rather rare.

Is screening allowed under 1.10?

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes

Silver
Posts: 1111
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Professional Responsibility Question?

Post by mikeytwoshoes » Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:49 pm

rbgrocio wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
rbgrocio wrote:When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
It's mostly used with 1.11 to avoid imputation of conflicts from former government attorneys to private firms. This rule allows private firms to hire government lawyers without fear of lost profits. Screening is also used where the prohibition is based on 1.9(a) or (b). However, my prof spent no time on this. I think disqualifications based on 1.9(a) or (b) are rather rare.

Is screening allowed under 1.10?
That's where 1.9(a) or (b) comes in. See 1.10(a)(2)(i-iii).

User avatar
rbgrocio

Silver
Posts: 560
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: Professional Responsibility Question?

Post by rbgrocio » Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:18 pm

mikeytwoshoes wrote:
rbgrocio wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
rbgrocio wrote:When is screening allowed to avoid imputation when dealing with conflicts of interest?
It's mostly used with 1.11 to avoid imputation of conflicts from former government attorneys to private firms. This rule allows private firms to hire government lawyers without fear of lost profits. Screening is also used where the prohibition is based on 1.9(a) or (b). However, my prof spent no time on this. I think disqualifications based on 1.9(a) or (b) are rather rare.

Is screening allowed under 1.10?
That's where 1.9(a) or (b) comes in. See 1.10(a)(2)(i-iii).

Ah ok. Thanks!

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”