Chirelstein's contracts Forum

[Mickey Quicknumbers]

There's a 2010 edition of this textbook that just came out, will the 2006 version be sufficient or do you think 2010 is going to be necessary?

[spondee]

Textbook? Do you mean the little supplement with the boat on the cover? If you're referring to that, you can probably get the cheaper, older version. But if you mean a casebook, then you'll have to get whatever version your professor says to get.

[Mickey Quicknumbers]

Textbook? Do you mean the little supplement with the boat on the cover? If you're referring to that, you can probably get the cheaper, older version. But if you mean a casebook, then you'll have to get whatever version your professor says to get.

Yah, i'm talking about the supplement sorry.

[General Tso]

2006 should be fine

i doubt much has changed in the UCC since then

[vanwinkle]

Contracts is the least rapidly-changing subject in the law, at least that you'll have to deal with as a 1L. A 2006 supplement should be more than adequate.

[jbarl1]

So when people say that Chirelstein is the best for contracts, are they referring to "Concepts and Case Analysis in the Law of Contracts" by Chirelstein? Thanks!

[vanwinkle]

So when people say that Chirelstein is the best for contracts, are they referring to "Concepts and Case Analysis in the Law of Contracts" by Chirelstein? Thanks!