Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . . Forum
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:01 pm
Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
putting the cart before the horse?
I go to a school where I can take T&E without first taking property. Is Prop essentially a pre-req for T&E or can I get away with not taking it?
I go to a school where I can take T&E without first taking property. Is Prop essentially a pre-req for T&E or can I get away with not taking it?
Last edited by Pablo Ramirez on Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:52 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:17 am
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
Is property not a required 1L course at your school?
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:01 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
We're not required to take Property . . . ever.transfer4545 wrote:Is property not a required 1L course at your school?
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:17 am
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
Wow, I thought it was a required course everywhere. Anyway, my 1L Property class was more of a survey course and the future interests/trusts/estates topics comprised about 2 weeks of the class. You might have to play a little catch-up in the first few weeks to establish a solid foundation/learn the vocabulary that you would have been introduced to in Property but you should be fine.
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
The answer to your question is: it doesn't matter. T&E isn't really related to property concepts. But, WTF law school doesn't require property? Non-ABA?Pablo Ramirez wrote:We're not required to take Property . . . ever.transfer4545 wrote:Is property not a required 1L course at your school?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:01 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
Pretty much the opposite, actually.Danneskjöld wrote:The answer to your question is: it doesn't matter. T&E isn't really related to property concepts. But, WTF law school doesn't require property? Non-ABA?Pablo Ramirez wrote:We're not required to take Property . . . ever.transfer4545 wrote:Is property not a required 1L course at your school?
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
Yale doesn't require property.
- zanda
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
TTTnotanumber wrote:Yale doesn't require property.
- NewHere
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:19 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
I'm going to dissent. It's probably not impossible to take T&E before property, but all things being equal I think I'd take property before T&E, if I were you.
A lot of these wills concepts ("To A for life, then to B so long as X, but if X then to C.") only make sense if you've had some prior exposure to life estates, defeasible fees, etc. Even if you forget about shifting and springing interests as soon as you walk out of the property exam, it must be hard to take T&E without some prior exposure to the vocabulary.
A lot of these wills concepts ("To A for life, then to B so long as X, but if X then to C.") only make sense if you've had some prior exposure to life estates, defeasible fees, etc. Even if you forget about shifting and springing interests as soon as you walk out of the property exam, it must be hard to take T&E without some prior exposure to the vocabulary.
- 24secure
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:27 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
i wish i didnt have to sit through property
- volfan6415
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:37 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
My guess is that if the school does not require property before T&E then you are probably ok....in all likelyhood the property course at your school does not spend anytime on the estate language and that is why property is not required as a prereq......
- animalcrkrs
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:24 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
I thought the T&E portion of property was hands down the most boring section of the whole course... life estate, fee simple determinable "to you after you do this but not if X does Y to C's poor 3 legged cat"..blah blah blah...and I liked property overall lol! So I'd rather take property before jumping into T&E.
Also, I agree with NewHere that it is probably more useful to have the estate lingo in your vocabulary as part of the bigger property picture before getting into T&E
Also, I agree with NewHere that it is probably more useful to have the estate lingo in your vocabulary as part of the bigger property picture before getting into T&E
-
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:04 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
What is it related to then?Danneskjöld wrote:The answer to your question is: it doesn't matter. T&E isn't really related to property concepts.Pablo Ramirez wrote:We're not required to take Property . . . ever.transfer4545 wrote:Is property not a required 1L course at your school?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:50 am
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
Pablo Ramirez wrote:Pretty much the opposite, actually.Danneskjöld wrote:The answer to your question is: it doesn't matter. T&E isn't really related to property concepts. But, WTF law school doesn't require property? Non-ABA?Pablo Ramirez wrote:We're not required to take Property . . . ever.transfer4545 wrote:Is property not a required 1L course at your school?
I'm sorry, did no one else find this exchange as hysterical as I did?notanumber wrote:Yale doesn't require property.
- grobbelski
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:50 pm
Re: Taking Trusts and Estates before taking Property = . . .
Honestly, you'll be fine. There are some conceptual things like estates in land that carried over from property into estates and trusts. How a tenancy in common passes upon the death of one party is one example. However mostly, these things are simple enough that they can be picked up. Then again, this may only be true in the classes that I took.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login