(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
-
Pretzel_Logic

- Posts: 8191
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:01 am
Post
by Pretzel_Logic » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:43 pm
kalvano wrote:keg411 wrote:Admin sounds like the most horrible thing ever.
If you can understand it, it's actually the most useful class I've taken in law school. Plus, you can get a good grade because so many others will be completely lost.
My teacher is awesome. In fact, he's so awesome, I don't think anybody is lost.
SHOOT. haha. Well...I think I've learned it...hopefully the curve doesn't ruin my life and eat all my steak. I figure if I get Mathews, Chevron, and notice and comment up on this thing I should be relatively okay. I have those down. 2lol.
-
traehekat

- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Post
by traehekat » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:48 pm
Pretzel_Logic wrote:I figure if I get Mathews, Chevron, and notice and comment up on this thing I should be relatively okay. I have those down. 2lol.
yup, that's pretty much my plan. pretty sure the curve is going to be brutal, though. i missed probably half of the classes, and of those i did attend, any time someone would talk in that class i would be like, "lol... what?"
-
de5igual

- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Post
by de5igual » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:57 pm
kalvano wrote:f0bolous wrote:Why is there no E&E for Oil&Gas? I don't think I'm ever taking state-specific classes ever again.
Are you in Texas?
Yes
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:32 am
f0bolous wrote:kalvano wrote:f0bolous wrote:Why is there no E&E for Oil&Gas? I don't think I'm ever taking state-specific classes ever again.
Are you in Texas?
Yes
I'm assuming not SMU - I can try and find you an O&G outline for Lowe at SMU if that would be helpful. Apparently he's some sort of legend in O&G.
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Post
by rad lulz » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:54 pm
My tax exam performance inspired me to study harder for my other ones. Fuck yeah.
-
de5igual

- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Post
by de5igual » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:54 pm
kalvano wrote:f0bolous wrote:kalvano wrote:f0bolous wrote:Why is there no E&E for Oil&Gas? I don't think I'm ever taking state-specific classes ever again.
Are you in Texas?
Yes
I'm assuming not SMU - I can try and find you an O&G outline for Lowe at SMU if that would be helpful. Apparently he's some sort of legend in O&G.
I've got some outlines, and the "In a Nutshell" book (I think by Lowe). Just no motivation to actually start anything.
-
Pretzel_Logic

- Posts: 8191
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:01 am
Post
by Pretzel_Logic » Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:02 pm
So today in our Admin final, Examsoft made every PC crash. lolololol. That three-hour final turned into five hours quick.
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:14 pm
Hearsay is fucking stupid. What's the point of excluding it if damn near everything is covered by an exemption?
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:41 pm
Is it just me, or are the CALI lessons on Evidence very poorly-worded? I find myself getting a question wrong and looking at the explanation and thinking "that's exactly what I said" before realizing that it randomly changed the form of the question or what it was asking somewhere in there.
-
wiseowl

- Posts: 1070
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:38 pm
Post
by wiseowl » Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:22 pm
Pretty much true of CALI in general, unfortunately. Always a huge waste of time.
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:33 pm
My prof is all M/C and you must say why the answer is right or wrong. He specially said CALI is a good place to prep, and he pulls a lot of his examples from there. It's just hard to get a good sense of where I am. I've never used CALI before.
I guess a better question would be on the Siegel's Q&A book, if am getting 90% right on the M/C in the back, is that good, or are those generally too easy?
-
Richie Tenenbaum

- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Post
by Richie Tenenbaum » Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:40 pm
kalvano wrote:My prof is all M/C and you must say why the answer is right or wrong. He specially said CALI is a good place to prep, and he pulls a lot of his examples from there. It's just hard to get a good sense of where I am. I've never used CALI before.
I guess a better question would be on the Siegel's Q&A book, if am getting 90% right on the M/C in the back, is that good, or are those generally too easy?
I just got Siegel's Q&A today and I haven't missed many of the first 25 MC. I also have not read much for this class all semester long and just started studying. I have a feeling that they are just too easy (though I hope I just retained way more than I thought I did throughout the semester).
-
td6624

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:45 pm
Post
by td6624 » Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:59 pm
if you go to most of the classes, do most of the reading, and take notes (half-assedly, but they still make sense for the most part)... what are the chances of getting worse than a C- on the exam?
nearly zero, right?
-
Doritos

- Posts: 1214
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:24 pm
Post
by Doritos » Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:01 pm
td6624 wrote:if you go to most of the classes, do most of the reading, and take notes (half-assedly, but they still make sense for the most part)... what are the chances of getting worse than a C- on the exam?
nearly zero, right?
Agreed. Throw in an old outline that's half decent and you got a serious shot at median my friend!
-
goosey

- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:48 pm
Post
by goosey » Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:04 pm
how on earth do i study for my exams. help.
-
Bikeflip

- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:01 pm
Post
by Bikeflip » Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:01 pm
goosey wrote:how on earth do i study for my exams. help.
You don't. Just write
PFM for every answer.
-
td6624

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:45 pm
Post
by td6624 » Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:17 pm
Doritos wrote:td6624 wrote:if you go to most of the classes, do most of the reading, and take notes (half-assedly, but they still make sense for the most part)... what are the chances of getting worse than a C- on the exam?
nearly zero, right?
Agreed. Throw in an old outline that's half decent and you got a serious shot at median my friend!
my brain understands this. my gut does not.
arrggghhh
-
PirateCap'n

- Posts: 747
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:44 pm
Post
by PirateCap'n » Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:43 pm
Have to learn Evidence by 8:00 Monday. Tell me I can do this and stay sane. The prof. is giving us the rules, but it's closed-book otherwise. Any suggestions on how to focus the studying?
-
kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Post
by kalvano » Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:57 pm
PirateCap'n wrote:Have to learn Evidence by 8:00 Monday. Tell me I can do this and stay sane. The prof. is giving us the rules, but it's closed-book otherwise. Any suggestions on how to focus the studying?
Just memorize the rules, really. Do some CALI lessons and practice hearsay...when I sat down to my M/C exam after doing CALI and the McNaughton / Morgan hearsay exams over and over, I barely had to look at my outline.
There's very few cases that you need to know, the rules are pretty much it.
-
as stars burn

- Posts: 514
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:04 pm
Post
by as stars burn » Tue May 01, 2012 10:32 am
wiseowl wrote:Pretty much true of CALI in general, unfortunately. Always a huge waste of time.
+1. I stopped doing Cali after first semester of 1L year because the wording didn't match up with my Professor so it was just confusing me. I tried it again this semester for Evidence, and lo and behold, same damn confusion. Never again. I'll stick to re-reading, re-condescending my outline and flash cards.
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Post
by rad lulz » Tue May 01, 2012 2:41 pm
as stars burn wrote:wiseowl wrote:Pretty much true of CALI in general, unfortunately. Always a huge waste of time.
+1. I stopped doing Cali after first semester of 1L year because the wording didn't match up with my Professor so it was just confusing me. I tried it again this semester for Evidence, and lo and behold, same damn confusion. Never again. I'll stick to re-reading, re-condescending my outline and flash cards.
My experience with Cali as well.
-
geekrocker37

- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:26 pm
Post
by geekrocker37 » Tue May 01, 2012 2:47 pm
Bankruptcy - Exam has 3 hr 45 min time frame, professor says 3:15 should be more than enough.
No one leaves early, people leave answers blank.
Bring on the curve baby.
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Post
by rad lulz » Tue May 01, 2012 2:48 pm
geekrocker37 wrote:
Bring on the curve baby.
My attitude toward all exams.
-
Antilles Haven

- Posts: 480
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:34 am
Post
by Antilles Haven » Tue May 01, 2012 2:51 pm
rad lulz wrote:geekrocker37 wrote:
Bring on the curve baby.
My attitude toward all exams.
There are a good number of 1L's who are in my evidence class as their elective
