Most amazing citations you will ever see. Forum

[3ThrowAway99]

bump

u srs?

[TheFriendlyBarber]

When you sit on the Court, you can cite whatever the f--- you want.

I thought this thread was going to be something along the lines of

"As this Court held in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), a woman's right to expose herself indecently is fully protected under the Second Amendment--if you can bear an arm, you can bear a tit." District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) ("Miller stands . . . for the proposition that the Second Amendment right, whatever its nature, extends only to certain types of weapons, [such as tits])."

[JamMasterJ]

When you sit on the Court, you can cite whatever the f--- you want.

I thought this thread was going to be something along the lines of

"As this Court held in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), a woman's right to expose herself indecently is fully protected under the Second Amendment--if you can bear an arm, you can bare? a tit." District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) ("Miller stands . . . for the proposition that the Second Amendment right, whatever its nature, extends only to certain types of weapons, [such as tits])."

[stormy]

When you sit on the Court, you can cite whatever the f--- you want.

I thought this thread was going to be something along the lines of

"As this Court held in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), a woman's right to expose herself indecently is fully protected under the Second Amendment--if you can bearbare? an arm, you can bare? a tit." District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) ("Miller stands . . . for the proposition that the Second Amendment right, whatever its nature, extends only to certain types of weapons, [such as tits])."

[truthypants]

When you sit on the Court, you can cite whatever the f--- you want.

I thought this thread was going to be something along the lines of

"As this Court held in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), a woman's right to expose herself indecently is fully protected under the Second Amendment--if you can bear[/s]bare? bear an arm, you can bare? a tit." District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) ("Miller stands . . . for the proposition that the Second Amendment right, whatever its nature, extends only to certain types of weapons, [such as tits])."