Oh. I hadn't read the whole thread when I posted that. Awesome.Unitas wrote:ExAnt3 wrote:Yeah, I'd be surprised if they were able to figure out who he was. Such a shame.katesearches wrote:lol that sucks for ppl in his sectionilovesf wrote:I mean how are they even going to find out who this guy is? "Um professor one of the 80 people in our class posted anonymously in an online forum asking a question about the exam." What are you going to do, do you guys want to take a whole new exam?It was likely done a few pages back...
But yeah this thread only had two good parts: the original post and the first response and when OP came back to quote TLS's terms of service to say how outing him to Duke would be a violations of the legal responsibilities of this site (maybe he should have put that much effort into his con law exam). After that it has gone downhill. Only two ways to make this thread even more legendary. Either Duke administrators post or OP returns. Everything else in this thread is just wasting space until either of those events occur.
. Forum
- ExAnt3
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:25 pm
Re: .
- ilovesf
- Posts: 12837
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Re: .
Awesome that he was outted?ExAnt3 wrote:Oh. I hadn't read the whole thread when I posted that. Awesome.Unitas wrote:It was likely done a few pages back...
But yeah this thread only had two good parts: the original post and the first response and when OP came back to quote TLS's terms of service to say how outing him to Duke would be a violations of the legal responsibilities of this site (maybe he should have put that much effort into his con law exam). After that it has gone downhill. Only two ways to make this thread even more legendary. Either Duke administrators post or OP returns. Everything else in this thread is just wasting space until either of those events occur.

- ExAnt3
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:25 pm
Re: .
Uh, yeah. Fuck that guy.ilovesf wrote:Awesome that he was outted?ExAnt3 wrote:Oh. I hadn't read the whole thread when I posted that. Awesome.Unitas wrote:It was likely done a few pages back...
But yeah this thread only had two good parts: the original post and the first response and when OP came back to quote TLS's terms of service to say how outing him to Duke would be a violations of the legal responsibilities of this site (maybe he should have put that much effort into his con law exam). After that it has gone downhill. Only two ways to make this thread even more legendary. Either Duke administrators post or OP returns. Everything else in this thread is just wasting space until either of those events occur.
- ilovesf
- Posts: 12837
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Re: .
I don't think he actually was. They were talking about a possible school that maybe he attended, started talking about someone who fit the profile, then realized he was in a different section.Desert Fox wrote:Where was he outted. I don't see i.t
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- notedgarfigaro
- Posts: 1484
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 2:33 pm
Re: .
it was quickly deleted...it was nice though, Pretty sure if anyone from Duke saw it, the guy was done.Desert Fox wrote:Where was he outted. I don't see i.t
- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: .
Google Cache will not be this kid's friend if Duke cares about this.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: .
TBH, I do feel bad for the poster. Sure, he/she should not have done that, but I'm sure many other people do google searches and other things which are still considered "cheating". @ Jolly How could Duke utilize Good Cache?JollyGreenGiant wrote:Google Cache will not be this kid's friend if Duke cares about this.
- dailygrind
- Posts: 19907
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:08 am
Re: .
This thread does not seem to serve any further purpose beyond that of a witch-hunt, which is a little worrying because of the possibility of false identification, and is also generally against our no-outing policy. The mods have therefore decided to lock it down, and we will be shutting down any spin-offs.
While I recognize that this poster has done something monumentally stupid which brings into question both their character and intelligence, we place a high priority on the privacy of user info, and the poster in question has probably already experienced significant anxiety over the last few days; days in the middle of their 1L exam period. For now, that should be enough.
While I recognize that this poster has done something monumentally stupid which brings into question both their character and intelligence, we place a high priority on the privacy of user info, and the poster in question has probably already experienced significant anxiety over the last few days; days in the middle of their 1L exam period. For now, that should be enough.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login