1L Exam Prep and Motivation Thread Forum

[snowpeach06]

I think the curve on that exam is going to be pretty loose.

Not as loose as my asshole was after taking that final.

Odd, but this has actually been a topic of conversation with my friends for the past few days. Is it true that if males have too much anal, they need a plug to keep their shit in, and if so, is there a name for that syndrome.

[maxpayne]

I got superstar whore pwned by eads. Hopefully I got a B or B-. But who knows. Fuck con law.

I think the curve on that exam is going to be pretty loose.

Hope so. I haven't talked to one person, not even the sumners braintrust, who thought they smoked it or even knew what the fuck was going on.

[Grizz]

I think the curve on that exam is going to be pretty loose.

Not as loose as my asshole was after taking that final.

Odd, but this has actually been a topic of conversation with my friends for the past few days. Is it true that if males have too much anal, they need a plug to keep their shit in, and if so, is there a name for that syndrome.

Why just males?

[snowpeach06]

I think the curve on that exam is going to be pretty loose.

Not as loose as my asshole was after taking that final.

Odd, but this has actually been a topic of conversation with my friends for the past few days. Is it true that if males have too much anal, they need a plug to keep their shit in, and if so, is there a name for that syndrome.

Why just males?

Good point. I suppose it came up in the topic of "homosexual sodomy."

[kalvano]

I got superstar whore pwned by eads. Hopefully I got a B or B-. But who knows. Fuck con law.

I think the curve on that exam is going to be pretty loose.

Hope so. I haven't talked to one person, not even the sumners braintrust, who thought they smoked it or even knew what the fuck was going on.

I think I did OK. I am absolutely sure I left points sitting out there, but I feel like I spotted and talked about a lot of issues. The only one I am really concerned about is the "appointing special counselors" part of the 1st question. I saw it as a Morrison analysis, but apparently no one else did.

Oops.

[snowpeach06]

I got superstar whore pwned by eads. Hopefully I got a B or B-. But who knows. Fuck con law.

I think the curve on that exam is going to be pretty loose.

Hope so. I haven't talked to one person, not even the sumners braintrust, who thought they smoked it or even knew what the fuck was going on.

I think I did OK. I am absolutely sure I left points sitting out there, but I feel like I spotted and talked about a lot of issues. The only one I am really concerned about is the "appointing special counselors" part of the 1st question. I saw it as a Morrison analysis, but apparently no one else did.

Oops.

I'm literally googling this case as we speak. I don't get it. Also, my teacher said something about we don't know if congress can impose a for-cause removal requirement on, for instance the Attorney General. But since he is purely executive, wouldn't the president have the sole removal power?

[maxpayne]

I got superstar whore pwned by eads. Hopefully I got a B or B-. But who knows. Fuck con law.

I think the curve on that exam is going to be pretty loose.

Hope so. I haven't talked to one person, not even the sumners braintrust, who thought they smoked it or even knew what the fuck was going on.

I think I did OK. I am absolutely sure I left points sitting out there, but I feel like I spotted and talked about a lot of issues. The only one I am really concerned about is the "appointing special counselors" part of the 1st question. I saw it as a Morrison analysis, but apparently no one else did.

Oops.

that's probably what it was. I didn't cover that though. It took me a while to figure what questions she actually wanted answered.ha

[kalvano]

I'm literally googling this case as we speak. I don't get it. Also, my teacher said something about we don't know if congress can impose a for-cause removal requirement on, for instance the Attorney General. But since he is purely executive, wouldn't the president have the sole removal power?

My notes on the case are pretty thin, but I have that basically:

o Where Congress places restrictions on removal but does not take power for itself, there is no violation of separation of powers
o Where there is no aggrandizement of one branch by another or an invasion of the core powers then there is no separation of powers issue
o This does not involve Congress’ attempt to gain power in the removal of executive officials other than by established powers of impeachment and conviction
o Because Congress was not involved in the removal then Congress is not taking power to itself, violating separation of powers


Our hypo was Congress trying to squeeze out Presidential appointments to special posts by cutting funding to them. I argued that the power of the purse was within Congress' powers, but that the President has Executive appointment powers, and he'd probably win in a pissing contest with Congress over appointments, but not using funds that Congress marked for other things to pay for special appointments he wanted that Congress specifically cut out of a spending bill.

I am more than a little sure I completely fucked it up.

[somewhatwayward]

did anyone save a copy of those crim law flowcharts that helmholtz posted?

[09042014]

Oh man, thank allah my islamic law class was 7 hours instead of 3. I needed teh extra time to learn from the outline.

[BeenDidThat]

DON'T STOP



BELIEVING!

[Grizz]

Oh man, thank allah my islamic law class was 7 hours instead of 3. I needed teh extra time to learn from the outline.

Sharia > U.S.C.

Discuss.

[snowpeach06]

I'm literally googling this case as we speak. I don't get it. Also, my teacher said something about we don't know if congress can impose a for-cause removal requirement on, for instance the Attorney General. But since he is purely executive, wouldn't the president have the sole removal power?

My notes on the case are pretty thin, but I have that basically:

o Where Congress places restrictions on removal but does not take power for itself, there is no violation of separation of powers
o Where there is no aggrandizement of one branch by another or an invasion of the core powers then there is no separation of powers issue
o This does not involve Congress’ attempt to gain power in the removal of executive officials other than by established powers of impeachment and conviction
o Because Congress was not involved in the removal then Congress is not taking power to itself, violating separation of powers


Our hypo was Congress trying to squeeze out Presidential appointments to special posts by cutting funding to them. I argued that the power of the purse was within Congress' powers, but that the President has Executive appointment powers, and he'd probably win in a pissing contest with Congress over appointments, but not using funds that Congress marked for other things to pay for special appointments he wanted that Congress specifically cut out of a spending bill.

I am more than a little sure I completely fucked it up.

We didn't cover half those topics. Ugh though, tonight I'm realizing just how much I DON'T know. And I genuinely thought I knew stuff a few hours ago. I guess I have 3-4 hours to learn it all tonight, and then a few hours tomorrow. But since it's an afternoon exam, I don't want to burn out studying all morning.

[BeenDidThat]

Oh man, thank allah my islamic law class was 7 hours instead of 3. I needed teh extra time to learn from the outline.

Sharia > U.S.C.

Discuss.

Inshallah.

[09042014]

Oh man, thank allah my islamic law class was 7 hours instead of 3. I needed teh extra time to learn from the outline.

Sharia > U.S.C.

Discuss.

Not being able to be convicted for rape without 4 witnesses of actual penetration FTW

[Thirteen]

I got superstar whore pwned by eads. Hopefully I got a B or B-. But who knows. Fuck con law.

I think the curve on that exam is going to be pretty loose.

Yep. I haven't talked to anyone that felt good about the test. I just feel... confused.

[emorystud2010]

.

[09042014]

i just had sex

Did you cry the whole time?

[emorystud2010]

.

[Grizz]

i just had sex

Thought you were breaking up.

[Thirteen]

i just had sex

Did you cry the whole time?

Hell yeah i did. As Akon says "Doesn't matter. Still counts."

Btw (maybe this should be a thread), do ppl actually cry during/after sex?

No.

[emorystud2010]

.

[Mickey Quicknumbers]

i just had sex

Well, there goes your write on.

[Baylan]

i just had sex

Thought you were breaking up.

Nah. Actually we're kinda talkin about taking a bit of a break during the summer since we'll be apart, but we're still bumpin uglies til thursday.

Combination Win, Fail, & /Self?

Note to self: bring lube to exams. It will help with the pain.

[Grizz]

i just had sex

Well, there goes your write on.

I dunno man. I think sex increases my performance. Less stress.