Thread Unworthy 1L fears, inquiries, and rants welcome here Forum
- TCScrutinizer
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:01 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
So when does this law school shit get hard?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: The Gunner Thread
TCScrutinizer wrote:So when does this law school shit get hard?
When you start with the Civ Pro.
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
I started with Crim and was having fun, then moved on to Contracts. Maybe not hard, but certainly not fun.kalvano wrote:TCScrutinizer wrote:So when does this law school shit get hard?
When you start with the Civ Pro.
- Kurt Cobain
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:43 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
Can you feel my love buzz?Burger in a can wrote:I want to get mad at you for making a lame joke but your avatar and screen name are too powerful.Kurt Cobain wrote:Bro, you get high before class?skoobily doobily wrote:I’m starting a thread for us c/o 2013 students to help each other, not to just get through law school, but to get through as high in the class as we can.
can't... resist... repressed...... teenage........hero worship......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5vXdbGt ... re=related
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
Reading Torts/Contracts after CivPro always makes it seem like a breather. We had to do Pennoyer for day #1. /killselfkalvano wrote:TCScrutinizer wrote:So when does this law school shit get hard?
When you start with the Civ Pro.
However, I'll admit that I like reading the notes after the cases; they always seem to have interesting information/questions to think about. I feel like there's something inherently wrong with me in enjoying that so far

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
Hey Keg! How's it going? Good to see you here! Where did you end up choosing to go to school?keg411 wrote:Reading Torts/Contracts after CivPro always makes it seem like a breather.kalvano wrote:TCScrutinizer wrote:So when does this law school shit get hard?
When you start with the Civ Pro.
Also, I like reading the notes after the cases. I feel like there's something inherently wrong with me in enjoying that.
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
I ended up at Rutgers-Camden. Combination of a bunch of reason (most of which include cost and family reasons). It's kind of been an emotional rollercoaster so far, but I'd say 90% of that is my own fault (and has little to do with school itself)Burger in a can wrote:Hey Keg! How's it going? Good to see you here! Where did you end up choosing to go to school?keg411 wrote:Reading Torts/Contracts after CivPro always makes it seem like a breather.kalvano wrote:TCScrutinizer wrote:So when does this law school shit get hard?
When you start with the Civ Pro.
Also, I like reading the notes after the cases. I feel like there's something inherently wrong with me in enjoying that.

I also hope that the rest of my classmates stopped posting because I don't want them to see me turn up in the Gunner Thread

-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
So far this is sort of more a Type-A Nerd thread than an actual gunner thread. Anyway, I remember you from the RU-Newark thread last winter. I'm surprised that you didn't end up there, but Camden is pretty close!keg411 wrote: I ended up at Rutgers-Camden. Combination of a bunch of reason (most of which include cost and family reasons). It's kind of been an emotional rollercoaster so far, but I'd say 90% of that is my own fault (and has little to do with school itself).
I also hope that the rest of my classmates stopped posting because I don't want them to see me turn up in the Gunner Thread.
Ok I will seriously cease my thread hijacking now.
- traehekat
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
The scope of this thread is large. Small talk is certainly permitted.Burger in a can wrote:Ok I will seriously cease my thread hijacking now.

- skoobily doobily
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:40 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
So far nothing else has had the power to destroy my confidence the way trying to understand the justice's comments on pennoyer has.keg411 wrote:Reading Torts/Contracts after CivPro always makes it seem like a breather. We had to do Pennoyer for day #1. /killselfkalvano wrote:TCScrutinizer wrote:So when does this law school shit get hard?
When you start with the Civ Pro.
However, I'll admit that I like reading the notes after the cases; they always seem to have interesting information/questions to think about. I feel like there's something inherently wrong with me in enjoying that so far.
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
I haven't read it yet for school, but the wikipedia article made my eyelids feel heavy after the second paragraph! Is it bad that my brain's response to complex material is to hurl itself into a deep, comatose nap? I'm scared.skoobily doobily wrote:
So far nothing else has had the power to destroy my confidence the way trying to understand the justice's comments on pennoyer has.

Last edited by Burger in a can on Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- john titor
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 2:42 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
TCScrutinizer wrote:So when does this law school shit get hard?
when you get your first set of grades back
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
That was the very first case I read for school since CivPro was my first class. It made me goskoobily doobily wrote:So far nothing else has had the power to destroy my confidence the way trying to understand the justice's comments on pennoyer has.

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- traehekat
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
So glad I don't have Civ Pro until the Spring.
- skoobily doobily
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:40 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
I'm trying to figure out why the Torts E&E has no mention of False imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, or conversion. Something tells me i'm missing something??
- Matteliszt
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
So my prop class has pretty much a hypo question in every reading set up. He gave us some reading + some supplemental for everything, and in each supplemental package there is a hypo. I suppose I should take note and think that he is going to be pretty hypo based?
- traehekat
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
Two of my three exams will likely include multiple choice sections. Does anyone know the supplement that is geared toward helping with professors who give MC exams?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Encyclopedia Brown
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:25 am
Re: The Gunner Thread
The Glannon Guide to... series is set up that way. For example:traehekat wrote:Two of my three exams will likely include multiple choice sections. Does anyone know the supplement that is geared toward helping with professors who give MC exams?
The Glannon Guide to Civil Procedure
I haven't gotten the one I ordered yet, but I think that's what you're looking for.
-
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:21 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
Hey! You don't know me, but I am so excited to see that you are going to a great school! I was following your cycle and I was really hoping that things would work out for you. It looks as though they have!Encyclopedia Brown wrote:The Glannon Guide to... series is set up that way. For example:traehekat wrote:Two of my three exams will likely include multiple choice sections. Does anyone know the supplement that is geared toward helping with professors who give MC exams?
The Glannon Guide to Civil Procedure
I haven't gotten the one I ordered yet, but I think that's what you're looking for.
(apologies again to this thread- it seems I keep recognizing online acquaintances here)
- Matteliszt
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:38 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
Encyclopedia Brown wrote:The Glannon Guide to... series is set up that way. For example:traehekat wrote:Two of my three exams will likely include multiple choice sections. Does anyone know the supplement that is geared toward helping with professors who give MC exams?
The Glannon Guide to Civil Procedure
I haven't gotten the one I ordered yet, but I think that's what you're looking for.
- Encyclopedia Brown
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:25 am
Re: The Gunner Thread
Thanks, burger!Burger in a can wrote:Hey! You don't know me, but I am so excited to see that you are going to a great school! I was following your cycle and I was really hoping that things would work out for you. It looks as though they have!
(apologies again to this thread- it seems I keep recognizing online acquaintances here)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- stonepeep
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:08 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
Depends what subject it is. If Civ Pro, then the Glannon Guide all the way. For other subjects, you might want to look around some.traehekat wrote:Two of my three exams will likely include multiple choice sections. Does anyone know the supplement that is geared toward helping with professors who give MC exams?
Glannon himself did not write the "Glannon Guide to Torts" (for example) so I don't know if it's any good. I mean, it could be, but what makes the Glannon books good is Glannon himself. Personally, I used the "Q&A" series to study for Torts multiple choice and found it quite useful. I believe that Kaplan also has multiple choice books for many subjects, and from what I recall, a bunch of people used the Kaplan book to study for our torts exam, and found it helpful. The BarBri first year review book has MC questions for most (all?) of the first-year subjects. BarBri gave out the 1st year review book for free to 1Ls who signed up for their bar course - you sign up now to lock in your price for the course after you graduate.
Definitely the best way to practice for a MC test is to do many MC questions.
Some professors do not cover intentional torts. Why, I don't know, but it must be a pretty common approach for Glannon to have ignored them in his book. Intentional torts are also really, really easy in comparison with negligence.I'm trying to figure out why the Torts E&E has no mention of False imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, or conversion. Something tells me i'm missing something??
- skoobily doobily
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:40 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
So having the black letter law and the casenotes is generally sufficient preparation for the exam, is what you're saying?stonepeep wrote:Some professors do not cover intentional torts. Why, I don't know, but it must be a pretty common approach for Glannon to have ignored them in his book. Intentional torts are also really, really easy in comparison with negligence.I'm trying to figure out why the Torts E&E has no mention of False imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattels, or conversion. Something tells me i'm missing something??
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: The Gunner Thread
We have some multiple choice in Contracts and I plan on using the first year BarBri book for that since my sister gave me hers (advantage of being second sibling to do something for once: free supplements FTW).
One thing I've found interesting is that in 2/3 of my substantive courses we don't just have one exam. We have 6 in Contracts and my Torts professor added a mid-term starting this year. Both gave the reasoning that they felt that their classes were becoming less and less about learning the law and how to analyze the law and more about who was able to just "take the best test" without getting any feedback or idea of how they were doing along the way and that students were frustrated by that. I don't know if this is a growing trend or just at my school, but it's kind of interesting (I'm not sure if the other section has any professors like that).
They've also all talked about banning laptops in class and that apparently that's a growing trend as well because they found all of the internet use/computer game playing in class to be "disrespectful".
Anyone else notice anything interesting like that?
One thing I've found interesting is that in 2/3 of my substantive courses we don't just have one exam. We have 6 in Contracts and my Torts professor added a mid-term starting this year. Both gave the reasoning that they felt that their classes were becoming less and less about learning the law and how to analyze the law and more about who was able to just "take the best test" without getting any feedback or idea of how they were doing along the way and that students were frustrated by that. I don't know if this is a growing trend or just at my school, but it's kind of interesting (I'm not sure if the other section has any professors like that).
They've also all talked about banning laptops in class and that apparently that's a growing trend as well because they found all of the internet use/computer game playing in class to be "disrespectful".
Anyone else notice anything interesting like that?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: The Gunner Thread
I have straight-up traditional formats. One exam, 100% of the grade.
And LW is a cast-iron bitch. Assignments due every class.
And LW is a cast-iron bitch. Assignments due every class.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login