SERIOUS ISSUE Forum
- encore1101
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:13 am
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
I agree with rpupkin. Write a negative review of the school then watch them cave.
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
no it was an informal prephearing via telephone. basically i accepted a plea deal. but now i want to appealrpupkin wrote:Yes, that is what I was implying, but that obviously won't work if you've already been convicted. Did the school try you in absentia?Gifted Hands wrote:i've already been convicted by school. i can't get out of this by sucking up if that' what you are implyingrpupkin wrote: This is a pickle. Have you ever heard the phrase "you attract more flies with honey than vinegar?" I suggest returning to the "online review" technique. But this time, write glowingly positive reviews of both your landlord and your attorney.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
Before the Director of Student Misconduct started asking you about the incident, did he/she advise you of your right to remain silent and your right to counsel?Gifted Hands wrote:no it was an informal prephearing via telephone. basically i accepted a plea deal. but now i want to appealrpupkin wrote: Yes, that is what I was implying, but that obviously won't work if you've already been convicted. Did the school try you in absentia?
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
yearpupkin wrote:Before the Director of Student Misconduct started asking you about the incident, did he/she advise you of your right to remain silent and your right to counsel?Gifted Hands wrote:no it was an informal prephearing via telephone. basically i accepted a plea deal. but now i want to appealrpupkin wrote: Yes, that is what I was implying, but that obviously won't work if you've already been convicted. Did the school try you in absentia?
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
Awesome.Gifted Hands wrote:yearpupkin wrote:Before the Director of Student Misconduct started asking you about the incident, did he/she advise you of your right to remain silent and your right to counsel?Gifted Hands wrote:no it was an informal prephearing via telephone. basically i accepted a plea deal. but now i want to appealrpupkin wrote: Yes, that is what I was implying, but that obviously won't work if you've already been convicted. Did the school try you in absentia?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8535
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
Gifted Hands, did you put it in writing? If not, call up the Dean and tell him that the deal is off. Then comment on his shitty negotiating skills and his stupidity for not putting the deal in writing. If it is in writing, you can argue that it's unenforceable because he violated your due process rights. And then sue the school for violating your due process and equal protection rights.rpupkin wrote:Before the Director of Student Misconduct started asking you about the incident, did he/she advise you of your right to remain silent and your right to counsel?Gifted Hands wrote:no it was an informal prephearing via telephone. basically i accepted a plea deal. but now i want to appealrpupkin wrote: Yes, that is what I was implying, but that obviously won't work if you've already been convicted. Did the school try you in absentia?
I'm not a lawyer so this isn't a legal advice. This is simply what I'd do in your shoes. That school needs to learn its lesson.
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
Ironically I'm actually less sure that Gifted Hands is Manali after this thread.
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
you got that right, i'll take this all the way the way up to the honor board if necessarylawman84 wrote:Gifted Hands, did you put it in writing? If not, call up the Dean and tell him that the deal is off. Then comment on his shitty negotiating skills and his stupidity for not putting the deal in writing. If it is in writing, you can argue that it's unenforceable because he violated your due process rights. And then sue the school for violating your due process and equal protection rights.rpupkin wrote:Before the Director of Student Misconduct started asking you about the incident, did he/she advise you of your right to remain silent and your right to counsel?Gifted Hands wrote:no it was an informal prephearing via telephone. basically i accepted a plea deal. but now i want to appealrpupkin wrote: Yes, that is what I was implying, but that obviously won't work if you've already been convicted. Did the school try you in absentia?
I'm not a lawyer so this isn't a legal advice. This is simply what I'd do in your shoes. That school needs to learn its lesson.
-
- Posts: 8535
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
It seems like Manali but I thought she got perma'd so I would have expected Nony to attack if it was Manali.somethingElse wrote:Ironically I'm actually less sure that Gifted Hands is Manali after this thread.
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
so y'all are saying that i did not have a first amednement right to insult a atty?
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
The First, Sixth, and Ninth Amendments, read together, protect one's right to insult an attorney. Key question: Is your law school public or private?Gifted Hands wrote:so y'all are saying that i did not have a first amednement right to insult a atty?
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
private, but the code is so vague that it's impossible to know what is protevected vs unprotected?rpupkin wrote:The First, Sixth, and Ninth Amendments, read together, protect one's right to insult an attorney. Key question: Is your law school public or private?Gifted Hands wrote:so y'all are saying that i did not have a first amednement right to insult a atty?
it just says "conduct that affects the dignity of another" So, if a kid slams a door in my face and i can call him an ashole, he can report me, and this can happen again
I didn't know what i was signing up for when i signed the school contract. Bc of the vaugueness
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
and the school only has jx on campus and places that the college has an interest in
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
What are examples of places that the college has an interest in?Gifted Hands wrote:and the school only has jx on campus and places that the college has an interest in
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
It's not Manali. There are many different varieties of weirdos around.lawman84 wrote:It seems like Manali but I thought she got perma'd so I would have expected Nony to attack if it was Manali.somethingElse wrote:Ironically I'm actually less sure that Gifted Hands is Manali after this thread.
- rcharter1978
- Posts: 4740
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 12:49 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
I thought you were pulling together a flash mob for the LRW grade? Just add a verse about this second injustice -- put in a few more dance moves and you'll be fine.Gifted Hands wrote:no i was drunk when i made a settlement offer. i was sober when i insulted him.
If there is anything YouTube has taught me it is that no one can defend themselves in the face of a flash mob.
- pancakes3
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
again, can't your very well respected HYS mentor make all of this go away with a phone call?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
I just took ethics and can't remember the rule, but your are not allowed to harass or disparage another attorney. I read a case where a lawyer made fun of another attorney's accent and was sanctioned. There was another case where one lawyer called another sweetie and babe during a deposition and was sanctioned. I would think that calling a lawyer while drunk to insult him would be a violation of the rules of professional conduct. You have the right to harshly criticize the conduct of another attorney, but personal attacks are over the line. Look at In re Jordan SchiffGifted Hands wrote:so y'all are saying that i did not have a first amednement right to insult a atty?
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
The college also has an interest in not being embarrassed by its members. When I was in college and you got arrested when school was not in session the college could discipline you. That said they wouldn't search local newspapers for police blotters, but if offensive criminal conduct that violated their values was brought to their attention they could discipline you regardless of what state you were in.Gifted Hands wrote:and the school only has jx on campus and places that the college has an interest in
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
that's stupid. so the joe jamail depositition video should have resulted in sanction all around. i can't post videos but look up "texas lawyer deposition" THERE ARE MANY DEPOSITION VIDEOS WHERE LAWYERS INSULT EACH OTHERjdmonkey wrote:I just took ethics and can't remember the rule, but your are not allowed to harass or disparage another attorney. I read a case where a lawyer made fun of another attorney's accent and was sanctioned. There was another case where one lawyer called another sweetie and babe during a deposition and was sanctioned. I would think that calling a lawyer while drunk to insult him would be a violation of the rules of professional conduct. You have the right to harshly criticize the conduct of another attorney, but personal attacks are over the line. Look at In re Jordan SchiffGifted Hands wrote:so y'all are saying that i did not have a first amednement right to insult a atty?
[youtube]td-KKmcYtrM[/youtube]
Last edited by Gifted Hands on Mon May 30, 2016 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
A lot of people jaywalk. Just because not every offender is brought to justice does not make it legal.Gifted Hands wrote:that's stupid. so the joe jamail depositition video should have resulted in sanction all around. i can't post videos but look up "texas lawyer deposition"jdmonkey wrote:I just took ethics and can't remember the rule, but your are not allowed to harass or disparage another attorney. I read a case where a lawyer made fun of another attorney's accent and was sanctioned. There was another case where one lawyer called another sweetie and babe during a deposition and was sanctioned. I would think that calling a lawyer while drunk to insult him would be a violation of the rules of professional conduct. You have the right to harshly criticize the conduct of another attorney, but personal attacks are over the line. Look at In re Jordan SchiffGifted Hands wrote:so y'all are saying that i did not have a first amednement right to insult a atty?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
yea that's besically why i'm pissed about this. if you got a ticket for jaywalking, you'd be to.jdmonkey wrote:A lot of people jaywalk. Just because not every offender is brought to justice does not make it legal.Gifted Hands wrote:that's stupid. so the joe jamail depositition video should have resulted in sanction all around. i can't post videos but look up "texas lawyer deposition"jdmonkey wrote:I just took ethics and can't remember the rule, but your are not allowed to harass or disparage another attorney. I read a case where a lawyer made fun of another attorney's accent and was sanctioned. There was another case where one lawyer called another sweetie and babe during a deposition and was sanctioned. I would think that calling a lawyer while drunk to insult him would be a violation of the rules of professional conduct. You have the right to harshly criticize the conduct of another attorney, but personal attacks are over the line. Look at In re Jordan SchiffGifted Hands wrote:so y'all are saying that i did not have a first amednement right to insult a atty?
- Dcc617
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
This might be good for you, like in a personal development, don't be such a raging dick sort of thing. Sometimes it takes having to deal with the consequences of being a dick for someone to learn.
OP, have you tried sincere contrition and apology? To literally everyone involved? It's amazing what that can accomplish sometimes. And even if it's not your 100% ideal outcome, that's probably good for you.
OP, have you tried sincere contrition and apology? To literally everyone involved? It's amazing what that can accomplish sometimes. And even if it's not your 100% ideal outcome, that's probably good for you.
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
yea in the pre-hearing, she said i was makng excuses at one point then i fake cried and apologized and said i would apologize to him, which she said not to. But then i got home and thought about it and the 1st amd and fired off a bunch of emails saying i feel wronged and want to appeal. And i blamed it on the alcohol (even though it's clear i was not drunk from the voicemail). Said law school has led me to drink, etc. she was a law student so she could relate and recomedned i go to therapy.Dcc617 wrote:This might be good for you, like in a personal development, don't be such a raging dick sort of thing. Sometimes it takes having to deal with the consequences of being a dick for someone to learn.
OP, have you tried sincere contrition and apology? To literally everyone involved? It's amazing what that can accomplish sometimes. And even if it's not your 100% ideal outcome, that's probably good for you.
basically, i apologized while crying and she still convivted me of the charge unilaterally after that phone convo
Last edited by Gifted Hands on Mon May 30, 2016 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Dcc617
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: SERIOUS ISSUE
OP, I mean SINCERE, GENUINE....actually, nope, never mind, not getting sucked into this.Gifted Hands wrote:yea in the pre-hearing, she said i was makng excuses at one point then i fake cried and apologized and said i would apologize to him, which she said not to. But then i got home and thought about it and the 1st amd and fired off a bunch of emails saying i feel wronged and want to appeal. And i blamed it on the alcohol (even though it's clear i was not drunk from the voicemail)Dcc617 wrote:This might be good for you, like in a personal development, don't be such a raging dick sort of thing. Sometimes it takes having to deal with the consequences of being a dick for someone to learn.
OP, have you tried sincere contrition and apology? To literally everyone involved? It's amazing what that can accomplish sometimes. And even if it's not your 100% ideal outcome, that's probably good for you.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login