Civ Pro Aggregation Question Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
sundance95

Gold
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Civ Pro Aggregation Question

Post by sundance95 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:11 pm

That looks really bad, but if you check out the Glannon E&E 6th Ed. pg. 258, you'll see a diagram of a crossclaim. 327 has a good diagram of an impleader. The basic difference is that A has no claim against C in the impleader hypo, whereas in a crossclaim both B and C are defending a claim brought by A.

User avatar
ph14

Gold
Posts: 3227
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Civ Pro Aggregation Question

Post by ph14 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:13 pm

sundance95 wrote:That looks really bad, but if you check out the Glannon E&E 6th Ed. pg. 258, you'll see a diagram of a crossclaim. 327 has a good diagram of an impleader. The basic difference is that A has no claim against C in the impleader hypo, whereas in a crossclaim both B and C are defending a claim brought by A.
Great, just checked those out, very helpful, and thanks again for clarifying.

User avatar
Mce252

Silver
Posts: 940
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:43 pm

Re: Civ Pro Aggregation Question

Post by Mce252 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:26 am

Thanks for the answers. My prof emailed as well and clarified that aggregation is permissible.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”