Civ Pro Aggregation Question Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
sundance95

Gold
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Civ Pro Aggregation Question

Post by sundance95 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:11 pm

That looks really bad, but if you check out the Glannon E&E 6th Ed. pg. 258, you'll see a diagram of a crossclaim. 327 has a good diagram of an impleader. The basic difference is that A has no claim against C in the impleader hypo, whereas in a crossclaim both B and C are defending a claim brought by A.
Top
User avatar
ph14

Gold
Posts: 3227
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Civ Pro Aggregation Question

Post by ph14 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:13 pm

sundance95 wrote:That looks really bad, but if you check out the Glannon E&E 6th Ed. pg. 258, you'll see a diagram of a crossclaim. 327 has a good diagram of an impleader. The basic difference is that A has no claim against C in the impleader hypo, whereas in a crossclaim both B and C are defending a claim brought by A.
Great, just checked those out, very helpful, and thanks again for clarifying.
Top
User avatar
Mce252

Silver
Posts: 940
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:43 pm

Re: Civ Pro Aggregation Question

Post by Mce252 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:26 am

Thanks for the answers. My prof emailed as well and clarified that aggregation is permissible.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”