
Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0 Forum
- reasonabledoubt
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0

Last edited by reasonabledoubt on Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
There's no such thing as a gunner in a class where participation impacts the grade.
-
- Posts: 1551
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:59 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
While OP's attitude is questionable, wouldn't the bolded be the proper way to study/prepare for any exam? Understanding what your professor is going to deem important to ask and point out in class seems like a useful skill in preparing for the exam the professor will later write.betasteve wrote:FYI - if you had used the time it took you to do the bolded to prepare for the exam, you'd probably have gotten a natural A. hthGummiBear wrote:Yeah, I never posed a hypo in class, and I only answered questions that I knew. But I was kind of weird in the sense that while reading the material before class, I would try and find things that the professor would ask about, and I would have an answer prepared for it. (It was especially awesome when it was stuff other people obviously didn't know)
<--- Not a law student.
Edit: Note here I am only talking about the preparing and reading before time, not the talking or answering in class bit.
Last edited by CyLaw on Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ZXCVBNM
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:45 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
must be a really top notch school where you can meet the professor and get your grade moved up a notch. that school is TTTTTTTTerific!
- TTT-LS
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
.
Last edited by TTT-LS on Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1551
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:59 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
Thanks. That is something I will keep in mind when I start next fall.betasteve wrote:However, it is best to go about this in terms of what he may ask on the exam and not in class, as the latter isn't, from my experience, all the same as the former.
- superserial
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:57 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
I'm guessing the numbers in the title refer to the quantity of gunners and jealous non-gunners, respectively.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 1:19 am
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
titcr. One of my profs was really big on class participation and stressed more than once that she would raise/lower grades based on participation. I flubbed my only cold call and didn't raise my hand once. I think that getting an A in this way was much more satisfying than getting one by puckering up for the prof.Georgiana wrote:Its even more enjoyable when you get an A without having to gun. hth.
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:36 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
Not that I advocate wasting everyone's time with annoying hypos, but isn't it foolish to ignore a method to potentially improve your grade if the professor clearly states that participation/whatever are 5-10% of the grade?Nietzsche_Addy wrote:titcr. One of my profs was really big on class participation and stressed more than once that she would raise/lower grades based on participation. I flubbed my only cold call and didn't raise my hand once. I think that getting an A in this way was much more satisfying than getting one by puckering up for the prof.Georgiana wrote:Its even more enjoyable when you get an A without having to gun. hth.
- Georgiana
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:42 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
The issue with law profs is that they don't have transparent grading systems. They may say that participation is x% of your grade but really this means "if I like you and remember your name, I may put it on a list that I give to the registrar and if you're on the border between two grades they'll bump you up." Instead of worrying about that, just learn the law and rock the exam. They won't be decreasing your grade for lack of participation (in my experience).eth3n wrote:Not that I advocate wasting everyone's time with annoying hypos, but isn't it foolish to ignore a method to potentially improve your grade if the professor clearly states that participation/whatever are 5-10% of the grade?Nietzsche_Addy wrote:titcr. One of my profs was really big on class participation and stressed more than once that she would raise/lower grades based on participation. I flubbed my only cold call and didn't raise my hand once. I think that getting an A in this way was much more satisfying than getting one by puckering up for the prof.Georgiana wrote:Its even more enjoyable when you get an A without having to gun. hth.
I've had classes where participation is said to be 20% of the grade (thats a LOT for a big lecture class). I didn't participate once and skipped quite often and surprisingly pulled off a pretty good grade for the amount I thought I knew. If participation and attendance were really that important, there's no way I would have the grade I do.
This is of course dependent on schools and professors, just sharing my experiences.
- Grad_Student
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 3:20 am
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
+10Georgiana wrote:Its even more enjoyable when you get an A without having to gun. hth.GummiBear wrote:Good, I'm pissed at all the people that are "show off" when you gun. When in reality, they would do the same thing if they had you intellectual capacity.4910 wrote:i will keep this thread in mind when i enter law school next fall
If you want any tips on how to be an efficient gunner, I can list them out later for those who are interested. If you're a hater then whatever, I'll enjoy my A.
- OperaSoprano
- Posts: 3417
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
<3superserial wrote:I'm guessing the numbers in the title refer to the quantity of gunners and jealous non-gunners, respectively.
- panda
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:11 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
this is such a flame.. look at the profile.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
This is such high-quality trolling it has to be a current or former TLS regular.panda wrote:this is such a flame.. look at the profile.
I put my money on CE2JD.
- panda
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:11 pm
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
wouldn't be surprised.vanwinkle wrote:This is such high-quality trolling it has to be a current or former TLS regular.panda wrote:this is such a flame.. look at the profile.
I put my money on CE2JD.
- Grad_Student
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 3:20 am
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
Nah, Waks trolling is much more in your face style, such as offing oneself.vanwinkle wrote:This is such high-quality trolling it has to be a current or former TLS regular.panda wrote:this is such a flame.. look at the profile.
I put my money on CE2JD.
- leobowski
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:11 am
Re: Gunners: 1 Jealous Non-Gunners: 0
GummiBear wrote:I just got my grade back for Evidence, and it was an A-. However school rules say if you participate a lot in class the professor may bump your grade up at his discretion.
He did for me so my final grade for the class was an A.
Where are all the gunner haters now? Just because you aren't prepared enough to talk about the material yourself in class doesn't mean you have to hate us.
Gunners > j00
--ImageRemoved--
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login