(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
-
rejectmaster

- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:20 pm
Post
by rejectmaster » Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:38 pm
i'm p. pumped that i managed to develop some pretty hXc stomach flu the day grades come out
at least i'll be preoccupied
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:24 pm
Do most of you guys have forced curves at your school? Our school has a mandatory mean in each class (86.5-87.5) but no forced curve. Some profs give out 100s, while some profs give out 95s as the best grade. Obviously, this means profs who give out 100s and high 90s have to give out more really bad grades to the bottom of the class, and profs who have a tighter mean will have fewer scores in the low 70s. This just seems to hurt people in the top half, while not really helping people at the bottom (because once you get down that low grades-wise, you 're not getting a job based off of grades anyway).
Sorry for the rant... this just really screws me because my property prof doesn't give out high 90s or 100s, while another property prof gave out 4 100s. If my prof used this kind of scale, I'd be about 12-15%iles higher be sitting in good shape for law review. Curious to hear if this is common and I should stop whining.
-
98234872348

- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm
Post
by 98234872348 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:27 pm
romothesavior wrote:Do most of you guys have forced curves at your school? Our school has a mandatory mean in each class (86.5-87.5) but no forced curve. Some profs give out 100s, while some profs give out 95s as the best grade. Obviously, this means profs who give out 100s and high 90s have to give out more really bad grades to the bottom of the class, and profs who have a tighter mean will have fewer scores in the low 70s. This just seems to hurt people in the top half, while not really helping people at the bottom (because once you get down that low grades-wise, you 're not getting a job based off of grades anyway).
Sorry for the rant... this just really screws me because my property prof doesn't give out high 90s or 100s, while another property prof gave out 4 100s. If my prof used this kind of scale, I'd be about 12-15%iles higher be sitting in good shape for law review. Curious to hear if this is common and I should stop whining.
This is assuming, of course, that you would have merited a 100.
-
Mickey Quicknumbers

- Posts: 2168
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:22 pm
Post
by Mickey Quicknumbers » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:28 pm
romothesavior wrote:Do most of you guys have forced curves at your school? Our school has a mandatory mean in each class (86.5-87.5) but no forced curve. Some profs give out 100s, while some profs give out 95s as the best grade. Obviously, this means profs who give out 100s and high 90s have to give out more really bad grades to the bottom of the class, and profs who have a tighter mean will have fewer scores in the low 70s. This just seems to hurt people in the top half, while not really helping people at the bottom (because once you get down that low grades-wise, you 're not getting a job based off of grades anyway).
Sorry for the rant... this just really screws me because my property prof doesn't give out high 90s or 100s, while another property prof gave out 4 100s. If my prof used this kind of scale, I'd be about 12-15%iles higher be sitting in good shape for law review. Curious to hear if this is common and I should stop whining.
That really sucks, but I think almost every school has that dilemma. Sorry to hear it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Post
by Grizz » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:30 pm
romothesavior wrote:Do most of you guys have forced curves at your school? Our school has a mandatory mean in each class (86.5-87.5) but no forced curve. Some profs give out 100s, while some profs give out 95s as the best grade. Obviously, this means profs who give out 100s and high 90s have to give out more really bad grades to the bottom of the class, and profs who have a tighter mean will have fewer scores in the low 70s. This just seems to hurt people in the top half, while not really helping people at the bottom (because once you get down that low grades-wise, you 're not getting a job based off of grades anyway).
Sorry for the rant... this just really screws me because my property prof doesn't give out high 90s or 100s, while another property prof gave out 4 100s. If my prof used this kind of scale, I'd be about 12-15%iles higher be sitting in good shape for law review. Curious to hear if this is common and I should stop whining.
Your blessings. Count them.
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:34 pm
mistergoft wrote:This is assuming, of course, that you would have merited a 100.
I didn't say I would have gotten one. I'm just saying that overlaying that prof's scale onto ours would drastically help me (and many of my peers in my section).
I guess I am just being overly-whiney. It just sucks when you hear through the grapevine that people in other sections are getting GPAs that aren't even mathematically possible in my section.
-
rejectmaster

- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:20 pm
Post
by rejectmaster » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:37 pm
romo are class ranks where you are extrapolated to all students or just by section?
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:40 pm
rejectmaster wrote:romo are class ranks where you are extrapolated to all students or just by section?
Errybody.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:42 pm
rad law wrote:Your blessings. Count them.
Oh I do brah. All ~15 of em. (number of employers at 1L OCI) T19 SECURE!
-
Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Post
by Grizz » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:44 pm
romothesavior wrote:rad law wrote:Your blessings. Count them.
Oh I do brah. All ~15 of em. (number of employers at 1L OCI) T19 SECURE!
Firms or employers?
-
Mickey Quicknumbers

- Posts: 2168
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:22 pm
Post
by Mickey Quicknumbers » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:46 pm
rad law wrote:romothesavior wrote:rad law wrote:Your blessings. Count them.
Oh I do brah. All ~15 of em. (number of employers at 1L OCI) T19 SECURE!
Firms or employers?
That reminds me, I totally nabbed an RA position today on the spot. Was not expecting that. Yay for some monies this summer!
-
Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Post
by Grizz » Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:49 pm
delBarco wrote:rad law wrote:romothesavior wrote:rad law wrote:Your blessings. Count them.
Oh I do brah. All ~15 of em. (number of employers at 1L OCI) T19 SECURE!
Firms or employers?
That reminds me, I totally nabbed an RA position today on the spot. Was not expecting that. Yay for some monies this summer!
LIKE A BOSS
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
98234872348

- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm
Post
by 98234872348 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:09 pm
delBarco wrote:rad law wrote:romothesavior wrote:rad law wrote:Your blessings. Count them.
Oh I do brah. All ~15 of em. (number of employers at 1L OCI) T19 SECURE!
Firms or employers?
That reminds me, I totally nabbed an RA position today on the spot. Was not expecting that. Yay for some monies this summer!
congrats.
-
Kilpatrick

- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:06 am
Post
by Kilpatrick » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:38 pm
delBarco wrote:rad law wrote:romothesavior wrote:rad law wrote:Your blessings. Count them.
Oh I do brah. All ~15 of em. (number of employers at 1L OCI) T19 SECURE!
Firms or employers?
That reminds me, I totally nabbed an RA position today on the spot. Was not expecting that. Yay for some monies this summer!
I've been thinking more about doing an RA position if possible, even though career services told me not to. How'd you land it?
-
Aqualibrium

- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:57 am
Post
by Aqualibrium » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:40 pm
Kilpatrick wrote:
I've been thinking more about doing an RA position if possible, even though career services told me not to. How'd you land it?
Why would career services tell you not to do an RA? They must really hate you...
-
Kilpatrick

- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:06 am
Post
by Kilpatrick » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:43 pm
They asked me what I wanted to do with a JD and I said 'get a job.' They asked me to be more specific and I said 'one that pays money.' So they told me being an RA would be a bad idea because I wouldn't get enough variety of experience to figure out my future or something.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
98234872348

- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm
Post
by 98234872348 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:45 pm
Kilpatrick wrote:They asked me what I wanted to do with a JD and I said 'get a job.' They asked me to be more specific and I said 'one that pays money.' So they told me being an RA would be a bad idea because I wouldn't get enough variety of experience to figure out my future or something.
As per usually, career services offices everywhere continue to shell out poor advice.
-
romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Post
by romothesavior » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:49 pm
mistergoft wrote:Kilpatrick wrote:They asked me what I wanted to do with a JD and I said 'get a job.' They asked me to be more specific and I said 'one that pays money.' So they told me being an RA would be a bad idea because I wouldn't get enough variety of experience to figure out my future or something.
As per usually, career services offices everywhere continue to shell out poor advice.
I have found our CSO to be pretty solid so far, although I haven't really spoken much to their counselors and guidance staff. But our dean is on the ball.
-
Aqualibrium

- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:57 am
Post
by Aqualibrium » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:50 pm
Yeah that is just dumb on their part. The credited response is "well firm positions for 1L's are scarce, but you should still try to apply to any that you're interested in. Also, look into XYZ externship programs for the summer, and RA'ing is always a good idea. The most important thing this summer is for you to get some sort of legal experience down on your resume."
-
rejectmaster

- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:20 pm
Post
by rejectmaster » Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:02 pm
wouldn't anything involving law be good
i feel like people have to be aware of issues in the market we've chosen
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
Eco

- Posts: 325
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:37 pm
Post
by Eco » Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:40 pm
..
-
swc65

- Posts: 1003
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am
Post
by swc65 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:49 pm
-
quakeroats

- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Post
by quakeroats » Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:51 pm
swc65 wrote:Eco wrote:..
Gratz!!
Grutter!!
-
swc65

- Posts: 1003
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am
Post
by swc65 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:59 pm
quakeroats wrote:swc65 wrote:Eco wrote:..
Gratz!!
Grutter!!
Grutter?
I'm not gratzing the ellipse; the grades were there then edited out.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login