Children and MMORPGs are actually not all that compatible. WoW doesn't have a pause button, and neither do screaming infants.historyholly wrote:Luckily the guy I am with actually likes the prospect of staying home. He jokes that he will raise the kids and play world of warcraft. If that does happen, I will jealous of him.
Babies. Forum
- dominkay
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: Babies.
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:35 pm
Re: Babies.
Oh wow, you're right because being a GOOD PARENT involves paying for an expensive wedding and a live-in nanny and an ivy league education. Anything less and you might as well give up the child for adoption.IAFG wrote:yes but we were planning on being good parents.slider wrote:LOL @ people who think kids will cost $600K+. My parents would have gone bankrupt long ago.

- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Babies.
i was j/kingslider wrote:Oh wow, you're right because being a GOOD PARENT involves paying for an expensive wedding and a live-in nanny and an ivy league education. Anything less and you might as well give up the child for adoption.IAFG wrote:yes but we were planning on being good parents.slider wrote:LOL @ people who think kids will cost $600K+. My parents would have gone bankrupt long ago.
- historyholly
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:49 pm
Re: Babies.
dominkay wrote:Children and MMORPGs are actually not all that compatible. WoW doesn't have a pause button, and neither do screaming infants.historyholly wrote:Luckily the guy I am with actually likes the prospect of staying home. He jokes that he will raise the kids and play world of warcraft. If that does happen, I will jealous of him.
I have a couple friends that manage to play with us and raise children of various ages. And it doesn't have a pause button if you have a guild that is hardcore and unreasonable. Either way, stay at home dad that plays video games seems awesome to me either way.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Babies.
i would edit this out before every geek on The Internet PMs youhistoryholly wrote:< last comment >
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- vexion
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:29 am
Re: Babies.
historyholly wrote:Luckily the guy I am with actually likes the prospect of staying home. He jokes that he will raise the kids and play world of warcraft. If that does happen, I will jealous of him.
Girls like a guy to do this?historyholly wrote:I have a couple friends that manage to play with us and raise children of various ages. And it doesn't have a pause button if you have a guild that is hardcore and unreasonable. Either way, stay at home dad that plays video games seems awesome to me either way.

LF1M accomodating wife.
- historyholly
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:49 pm
Re: Babies.
Part of the risk of playing unfortunately.IAFG wrote:i would edit this out before every geek on The Internet PMs youhistoryholly wrote:< last comment >

- dominkay
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: Babies.
I guess I'm skeptical that Guy Who Wants To Be A Stay At Home Dad and Play Video Games isn't actually Lazy Guy Addicted to Video Games.historyholly wrote:dominkay wrote:Children and MMORPGs are actually not all that compatible. WoW doesn't have a pause button, and neither do screaming infants.historyholly wrote:Luckily the guy I am with actually likes the prospect of staying home. He jokes that he will raise the kids and play world of warcraft. If that does happen, I will jealous of him.
I have a couple friends that manage to play with us and raise children of various ages. And it doesn't have a pause button if you have a guild that is hardcore and unreasonable. Either way, stay at home dad that plays video games seems awesome to me either way.
- historyholly
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:49 pm
Re: Babies.
So, would mom's that stay home to take care of the kids and happens to watch soaps or even maybe play video games be lazy?dominkay wrote:I guess I'm skeptical that Guy Who Wants To Be A Stay At Home Dad and Play Video Games isn't actually Lazy Guy Addicted to Video Games.historyholly wrote:dominkay wrote:Children and MMORPGs are actually not all that compatible. WoW doesn't have a pause button, and neither do screaming infants.historyholly wrote:Luckily the guy I am with actually likes the prospect of staying home. He jokes that he will raise the kids and play world of warcraft. If that does happen, I will jealous of him.
I have a couple friends that manage to play with us and raise children of various ages. And it doesn't have a pause button if you have a guild that is hardcore and unreasonable. Either way, stay at home dad that plays video games seems awesome to me either way.
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:35 pm
Re: Babies.
This is 100% on point.dominkay wrote:
I guess I'm skeptical that Guy Who Wants To Be A Stay At Home Dad and Play Video Games isn't actually Lazy Guy Addicted to Video Games.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Babies.
Amy, I am sure what you describe is something you could have. The question is why you would want to.
- chicagolaw2013
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm
Re: Babies.
And I'm telling YOU that genetics has a lot to do with it. I'm a psych major, I've taken the class, and I've read so many research findings on genetics and child development I could vomit.Rock Chalk wrote:Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.chicagolaw2013 wrote:My sisters both had children in their thirties. One sister is 38 and has children that are 8 and 5, and the other will be 41 in August, and her son is 4 and daughter will be 2 next month. My mom had my sisters when she was in her early 20's, and me when she was 37. To the person who said that birth defects go up, that may be a theory, but all 4 nieces and nephews are quite smart. The 4 year old reads at a 3rd grade level...we're convinced he's going to cure cancer or something, the kid's a genius. It's sort of creepy how smart he is, actually.
I've had to actively try NOT to get pregnant...apparently we are a fertile bunch hahaha.
Oh, and on the job or kids note, my hubby to be is in outside sales, so he works from home most days anyway. He hopes to be the stay at home dad some days, and we'd have a nanny when he must be out on client calls.
As for the bolded: Do your research. I'm not spouting off my personal theory, I'm telling you the consensus of the medical community based on extensive data collection. See the link above, and an intro level child psychology/development class.
- chicagolaw2013
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm
Re: Babies.
And you are correct on the testing, but genetics deals a heavy hand in these types of things as well, which is why many babies born after a mother is of a certain age DON'T have defects. So, I should say that I agree with you that perhaps incidence goes up, but it's not a reason to forego having a child if genetic evidence is on your side.xyzzzzzzzz wrote:Rock Chalk wrote:Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.chicagolaw2013 wrote:My sisters both had children in their thirties. One sister is 38 and has children that are 8 and 5, and the other will be 41 in August, and her son is 4 and daughter will be 2 next month. My mom had my sisters when she was in her early 20's, and me when she was 37. To the person who said that birth defects go up, that may be a theory, but all 4 nieces and nephews are quite smart. The 4 year old reads at a 3rd grade level...we're convinced he's going to cure cancer or something, the kid's a genius. It's sort of creepy how smart he is, actually.
I've had to actively try NOT to get pregnant...apparently we are a fertile bunch hahaha.
Oh, and on the job or kids note, my hubby to be is in outside sales, so he works from home most days anyway. He hopes to be the stay at home dad some days, and we'd have a nanny when he must be out on client calls.
As for the bolded: Do your research. I'm not spouting off my personal theory, I'm telling you the consensus of the medical community based on extensive data collection. See the link above, and an intro level child psychology/development class.
Pretty sure rock is right. That is precisely why they test eggs for down syndrome after a woman turns 34/35.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- yinz
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: Babies.
Google it.slider wrote:LOL @ people who think kids will cost $600K+. My parents would have gone bankrupt long ago.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Babies.
it isn't really the "society" element that gives me pause so much as the hardwired biology partamyLAchemist wrote:Different people want different things. I think if men want that situation, it is totally normal. If women do, society/others view them negatively. I am more of a to each their own kinda gal.IAFG wrote:Amy, I am sure what you describe is something you could have. The question is why you would want to.
- dominkay
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: Babies.
I've never heard a woman say, "I'll raise the kids and watch Days of Our Lives." Probably because women tend to have a more realistic idea of what being a stay at home parent entails.historyholly wrote: So, would mom's that stay home to take care of the kids and happens to watch soaps or even maybe play video games be lazy?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 8:54 am
Re: Babies.
This thread makes me want to get a vasectomy.
hth.
hth.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Babies.
no one's stopping you. in fact, my dad's friend gave himself one (they're both surgeons) so it's possible.theLastZion wrote:This thread makes me want to get a vasectomy.
hth.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 8:54 am
Re: Babies.
Cool, I don't have health insurance so that sounds like a good plan. Just give me some numbing gel and a pair of scissors!!!!IAFG wrote:no one's stopping you. in fact, my dad's friend gave himself one (they're both surgeons) so it's possible.theLastZion wrote:This thread makes me want to get a vasectomy.
hth.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Babies.
family guy has an instruction manual set to song. you'll need towel clamps.theLastZion wrote:Cool, I don't have health insurance so that sounds like a good plan. Just give me some numbing gel and a pair of scissors!!!!IAFG wrote:no one's stopping you. in fact, my dad's friend gave himself one (they're both surgeons) so it's possible.theLastZion wrote:This thread makes me want to get a vasectomy.
hth.
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:35 pm
Re: Babies.
No one needs to google this. It is common sense. Something that seems to be disappearing these days.yinz wrote:Google it.slider wrote:LOL @ people who think kids will cost $600K+. My parents would have gone bankrupt long ago.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rock Chalk
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: Babies.
I was referring to the bolded portion of your post. Older moms presenting a higher risk is not a theory, it's an observation. I would expect someone so experienced with research know this.chicagolaw2013 wrote:And I'm telling YOU that genetics has a lot to do with it. I'm a psych major, I've taken the class, and I've read so many research findings on genetics and child development I could vomit.Rock Chalk wrote:Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.chicagolaw2013 wrote:My sisters both had children in their thirties. One sister is 38 and has children that are 8 and 5, and the other will be 41 in August, and her son is 4 and daughter will be 2 next month. My mom had my sisters when she was in her early 20's, and me when she was 37. To the person who said that birth defects go up, that may be a theory, but all 4 nieces and nephews are quite smart. The 4 year old reads at a 3rd grade level...we're convinced he's going to cure cancer or something, the kid's a genius. It's sort of creepy how smart he is, actually.
I've had to actively try NOT to get pregnant...apparently we are a fertile bunch hahaha.
Oh, and on the job or kids note, my hubby to be is in outside sales, so he works from home most days anyway. He hopes to be the stay at home dad some days, and we'd have a nanny when he must be out on client calls.
As for the bolded: Do your research. I'm not spouting off my personal theory, I'm telling you the consensus of the medical community based on extensive data collection. See the link above, and an intro level child psychology/development class.
- Sammi
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Babies.
Wow... my boyfriend and I have been talking a lot lately about the possibilities of our future kids even coming into being... He's a consultant and flies out a lot, and then I'll be a lawyer. However, he just got a promotion and will be traveling less, so his ability to work from home will hopefully help us out a lot. He's a bit naive when it comes to having a baby right after law school--he thinks he can be done.
Edit: I will be 30 upon graduation... which means that I'll need to put in 3-5 years just to pay off debt: 35 to start with? My mom had me when she was 36, but I was the last one out.
Edit: I will be 30 upon graduation... which means that I'll need to put in 3-5 years just to pay off debt: 35 to start with? My mom had me when she was 36, but I was the last one out.
- nygrrrl
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am
Re: Babies.
Amy, you've kind of described ME, tbh. I LOVE my job, figured I'd spend maybe 6 wks at home with the kid, then get baby sitters... not how it turned out AT ALL. It was 16 weeks before I felt ready to leave my 1st kid (I was stunned by how much I WANTED to be home with her) and then I stuck with PT sitters for a year after that. Not until she was 18 months old did I hire a FT nanny/sitter. Mind you, I was able to do a lot of my work from home, but I was blindsided by how different motherhood was from what I'd envisioned. I agree with IAFG - you can create the kind of parenting environment that works for you - and in this, "What works for YOU " is the key phrase. I know lots of parents and we pretty much all have different styles - and our kids are pretty much all healthy, happy, well-adjusted. It's the imposition of hard and fast rules about things like this that is a problem, imho.amyLAchemist wrote: Wouldn't this be very different for women who 1) aren't as emotional, 2) don't view being a mom>having a great career, and 3) have full time, round the clock help (nanny, mother in law, stay at home dad, etc) so you don't have to leave work if your kid is sick or whatever? I was also basing the 3-4 weeks off of my half dozen friends who have had children, maybe that is not a representative sample (and I don't have any girlfriends who had C-sections, which yeah, I've heard is longer), I don't know. But that was what they took before they went back. Given, they all tend to be in the situation described above.
My dad raised me as a single father (mother out of the picture) who worked very long hours and has a very successful career. And he never left work if I was sick, since I had a live-in nanny. I think that experience might also be skewing my view.
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:10 pm
Re: Babies.
+1IAFG wrote:it isn't really the "society" element that gives me pause so much as the hardwired biology partamyLAchemist wrote:Different people want different things. I think if men want that situation, it is totally normal. If women do, society/others view them negatively. I am more of a to each their own kinda gal.IAFG wrote:Amy, I am sure what you describe is something you could have. The question is why you would want to.
Anyone here read The Disposable Male? It's a nice evolutionary look at modern gender roles. The author basically suggests extreme right-wing family values based on how evolution has developed each gender.
I just don't understand the mentality of planned outsourcing of child raising along the lines of, "We're both going to make 6 figures working 50-60 hours a week and hire a full-time nanny." Obviously, we all make do with what we are given under the circumstances, but I can only imagine (as a non-parent) that there isn't anything more valuable for a parent than time with one's children, even ignoring the IQ, emotional, and other benefits gained from parent-child interactions.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login