I'm very glad for this.TheFutureLawyer wrote:You, sir, have obviously not spent many summers in the south surrounded by swamps.law4vus wrote: Nothing worse than being hot AND clammy.

I'm very glad for this.TheFutureLawyer wrote:You, sir, have obviously not spent many summers in the south surrounded by swamps.law4vus wrote: Nothing worse than being hot AND clammy.
Gross...in other words I am going to have to get used to running at 5am....fun...TheFutureLawyer wrote:You, sir, have obviously not spent many summers in the south surrounded by swamps. Hot + clammy + mosquitoes. Getting eaten alive every day out here.law4vus wrote: Nothing worse than being hot AND clammy.
I run at night anyway. Less people to see how embarrassingly out of shape I am (10 minute mile ftlqueenlizzie13 wrote:Gross...in other words I am going to have to get used to running at 5am....fun...TheFutureLawyer wrote:You, sir, have obviously not spent many summers in the south surrounded by swamps. Hot + clammy + mosquitoes. Getting eaten alive every day out here.law4vus wrote: Nothing worse than being hot AND clammy.
If you think DC doesn't have mosquitos you're in for a rude awakening.TheFutureLawyer wrote:You, sir, have obviously not spent many summers in the south surrounded by swamps. Hot + clammy + mosquitoes. Getting eaten alive every day out here.law4vus wrote: Nothing worse than being hot AND clammy.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
As long as I have some male running partners I would definitely feel more safe at night. I don't think I should be going out alone at night.justhockey31 wrote:Night running is definitely the way to go...yet I am a bit concerned running at night in a city like DC because of the crime
I'd usually do 2 miles, though I've been on a break for some time now and can't even do an entire mile without having to walk 1/4 of it.justhockey31 wrote:Depends on how far of a run you are talking about...I'm a 3 miles tops sort of person, people who can run marathons amaze me lol
Foggy Bottom is fine, just avoid some of the nightlife areas and run with someone if possible. Parts of DC (like GW's area) are fine as long as you aren't irresponsible about it.justhockey31 wrote:Night running is definitely the way to go...yet I am a bit concerned running at night in a city like DC because of the crime
Me too. I stopped wearing flip flops because of the skeeters. Stopped wearing flip flops everywhere! In the summer! The humanity!TheFutureLawyer wrote:You, sir, have obviously not spent many summers in the south surrounded by swamps. Hot + clammy + mosquitoes. Getting eaten alive every day out here.law4vus wrote: Nothing worse than being hot AND clammy.
Yeah, I got mine the same day (dropped it off in person, though). When did you send it?justhockey31 wrote:Does GW send out a confirmation when they get your seat deposit?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Also, if your seat deposits have been processed, they will be shown on your ebill as credits. (There's a link to your "Student Accounts Menu" from banweb.)justhockey31 wrote:Earlier this weekI guess I will shoot them an email tomorrow to make sure!
Did you guys get in off the waitlist or am I missing some deposit deadline?law4vus wrote:Yeah, I got mine the same day (dropped it off in person, though). When did you send it?justhockey31 wrote:Does GW send out a confirmation when they get your seat deposit?
Waitlist, so don't worry.Naked Dude wrote:Did you guys get in off the waitlist or am I missing some deposit deadline?law4vus wrote:Yeah, I got mine the same day (dropped it off in person, though). When did you send it?justhockey31 wrote:Does GW send out a confirmation when they get your seat deposit?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
It would be difficult to comment on your situation without knowing more about the apartment option. For instance, your apartment building might have centrally managed climated control (i.e., you don't have your own thermostat), it could be infested with rodents, you're choosing between a one-bedroom vs. a studio (as in the Aston), you need a furnished place, etc. I don't know if you went through the earlier posts either here or in the other thread, but I remember seeing someone post a youtube tour of his Aston place.sparcarc wrote:Hello guys, just looking for collective wisdom -
I'm trying to choose a place to live. It'll be either the Aston or an apartment.
Cost-wise, with everything including utilities factored in, it seems that there is only $4 difference / day between the two (the Aston's more expensive. $54 vs $50) It still amounts to a difference of $120 / month but considering everything else, that amount does not seem to be a factor important enough in making my decision making here.
Other than the advantage of living with fellow law students, is there an advantage in living at the Aston?
The distance seems to be almost exactly the same and the year the buildings were built are not too different from each other.
I really apologize in advance for posting in two separate GW threads - it seems that I'll need to make a decision within a few hours from now. (The unit owner I was negotiating with just sent an email getting ready for lease-signing and 30 minutes after that, I received an email from GW Housing that there is a space available.)
To me, especially coming from a different city, the value of having the place furnished cannot be understated. Moving really truly sucks. Especially when you don't have anyone to help you. I'll be at the aston, and though I haven't been in a place that small since freshman year (ditto on the twin bed), it's still worth it.schooner wrote:It would be difficult to comment on your situation without knowing more about the apartment option. For instance, your apartment building might have centrally managed climated control (i.e., you don't have your own thermostat), it could be infested with rodents, you're choosing between a one-bedroom vs. a studio (as in the Aston), you need a furnished place, etc. I don't know if you went through the earlier posts either here or in the other thread, but I remember seeing someone post a youtube tour of his Aston place.sparcarc wrote:Hello guys, just looking for collective wisdom -
I'm trying to choose a place to live. It'll be either the Aston or an apartment.
Cost-wise, with everything including utilities factored in, it seems that there is only $4 difference / day between the two (the Aston's more expensive. $54 vs $50) It still amounts to a difference of $120 / month but considering everything else, that amount does not seem to be a factor important enough in making my decision making here.
Other than the advantage of living with fellow law students, is there an advantage in living at the Aston?
The distance seems to be almost exactly the same and the year the buildings were built are not too different from each other.
I really apologize in advance for posting in two separate GW threads - it seems that I'll need to make a decision within a few hours from now. (The unit owner I was negotiating with just sent an email getting ready for lease-signing and 30 minutes after that, I received an email from GW Housing that there is a space available.)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Thanks for the response!It would be difficult to comment on your situation without knowing more about the apartment option. For instance, your apartment building might have centrally managed climated control (i.e., you don't have your own thermostat), it could be infested with rodents, you're choosing between a one-bedroom vs. a studio (as in the Aston), you need a furnished place, etc. I don't know if you went through the earlier posts either here or in the other thread, but I remember seeing someone post a youtube tour of his Aston place.
That is definitely true - having a furnished apartment is a factor in my decision.. And yes, the twin bed.. I guess I'm just trying to figure out whether that'd be worth $120 / month and whether I need to consider additional factors.To me, especially coming from a different city, the value of having the place furnished cannot be understated. Moving really truly sucks. Especially when you don't have anyone to help you. I'll be at the aston, and though I haven't been in a place that small since freshman year (ditto on the twin bed), it's still worth it.
Be careful with your written lease/sublet agreement, esp. the landlord's (or tenant's, if you're subletting) promise that the apartment is not infested and move-in/move-out timelines, particularly if you won't be in DC during the summers.sparcarc wrote:Thanks for the response!It would be difficult to comment on your situation without knowing more about the apartment option. For instance, your apartment building might have centrally managed climated control (i.e., you don't have your own thermostat), it could be infested with rodents, you're choosing between a one-bedroom vs. a studio (as in the Aston), you need a furnished place, etc. I don't know if you went through the earlier posts either here or in the other thread, but I remember seeing someone post a youtube tour of his Aston place.
The Apartment I was looking at (Condominium, actually. So it'd be a contract with an individual unit owner,) is a studio as well, although slightly larger at 500 sq ft. I did see that YouTube video and it seems the unit conditions are about the same. I'd be able to control the temp settings in the condo as well. Even though the owner said there are no pest problems.. it still is a concern, as you said.
That is definitely true - having a furnished apartment is a factor in my decision.. And yes, the twin bed.. I guess I'm just trying to figure out whether that'd be worth $120 / month and whether I need to consider additional factors.To me, especially coming from a different city, the value of having the place furnished cannot be understated. Moving really truly sucks. Especially when you don't have anyone to help you. I'll be at the aston, and though I haven't been in a place that small since freshman year (ditto on the twin bed), it's still worth it.
Teoeo (very helpful guy btw) actually posted 2 (two!) videos.schooner wrote:It would be difficult to comment on your situation without knowing more about the apartment option. For instance, your apartment building might have centrally managed climated control (i.e., you don't have your own thermostat), it could be infested with rodents, you're choosing between a one-bedroom vs. a studio (as in the Aston), you need a furnished place, etc. I don't know if you went through the earlier posts either here or in the other thread, but I remember seeing someone post a youtube tour of his Aston place.sparcarc wrote:Hello guys, just looking for collective wisdom -
I'm trying to choose a place to live. It'll be either the Aston or an apartment.
Cost-wise, with everything including utilities factored in, it seems that there is only $4 difference / day between the two (the Aston's more expensive. $54 vs $50) It still amounts to a difference of $120 / month but considering everything else, that amount does not seem to be a factor important enough in making my decision making here.
Other than the advantage of living with fellow law students, is there an advantage in living at the Aston?
The distance seems to be almost exactly the same and the year the buildings were built are not too different from each other.
I really apologize in advance for posting in two separate GW threads - it seems that I'll need to make a decision within a few hours from now. (The unit owner I was negotiating with just sent an email getting ready for lease-signing and 30 minutes after that, I received an email from GW Housing that there is a space available.)
You haven't gotten your room assignment yet right? I was told 10 days...10 days ago. Looking at last year's thread, it looks like Aston people found out around July 22 or so, so maybe later this week...TheFutureLawyer wrote:To me, especially coming from a different city, the value of having the place furnished cannot be understated. Moving really truly sucks. Especially when you don't have anyone to help you. I'll be at the aston, and though I haven't been in a place that small since freshman year (ditto on the twin bed), it's still worth it.schooner wrote:It would be difficult to comment on your situation without knowing more about the apartment option. For instance, your apartment building might have centrally managed climated control (i.e., you don't have your own thermostat), it could be infested with rodents, you're choosing between a one-bedroom vs. a studio (as in the Aston), you need a furnished place, etc. I don't know if you went through the earlier posts either here or in the other thread, but I remember seeing someone post a youtube tour of his Aston place.sparcarc wrote:Hello guys, just looking for collective wisdom -
I'm trying to choose a place to live. It'll be either the Aston or an apartment.
Cost-wise, with everything including utilities factored in, it seems that there is only $4 difference / day between the two (the Aston's more expensive. $54 vs $50) It still amounts to a difference of $120 / month but considering everything else, that amount does not seem to be a factor important enough in making my decision making here.
Other than the advantage of living with fellow law students, is there an advantage in living at the Aston?
The distance seems to be almost exactly the same and the year the buildings were built are not too different from each other.
I really apologize in advance for posting in two separate GW threads - it seems that I'll need to make a decision within a few hours from now. (The unit owner I was negotiating with just sent an email getting ready for lease-signing and 30 minutes after that, I received an email from GW Housing that there is a space available.)
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login