Academia: Law review and transferring Forum

[AZN MegaPoaster]

How big of a deal is law review for academia?

Is it better to be on law review and top of your class at a top50 school, or to be at CCN? I say CCN only because if I get into H I will transfer for sure. So, basically, is it worth it to give up law review at a top50 (let's assume I get my note published, too) where I am number 2 in my class for CCN? Or should I stay at the top50 instead?

[mileslibertatis]

I don't really know, but my impression is that the single most important factor for having a shot at academia is going to HYSCCN. All else is secondary.

[dpk711]

I don't really know, but my impression is that the single most important factor for having a shot at academia is going to HYSCCN. All else is secondary.

[lawgrl14]

I don't really know, but my impression is that the single most important factor for having a shot at academia is going to HYSCCN. All else is secondary.

Let's not get crazy. Everyone realizes that academia is tough, but I'm sure there are plenty of soon-to-be professors graduating from those schools you just struck through. Out of 7 doctrinal professors of mine at a T20 this year, none graduated from Y or H and several are (relatively) young, so take that for what it's worth.

With that said, my hunch is that if you are wed to the idea of maintaining a shot at academia, you should transfer to CCN and then work your ass off to do well. But who am I? Just some girl on a message board. You should talk to a professor at your school you feel comfortable with, maybe one that wrote you a rec letter.

[CanadianWolf]

Publishing is the single most important factor for academia. A law degree from Harvard or Yale may help you get published, however.

[lawyerwannabe]

IMHO, I would not transfer (given your desire for academia) unless you get into HYS. I would stay at my current school, do law review, and try to publish some awesome papers (of course also while developing great relationships with a few profs so you have some solid LOR when clerkship time comes).

[flightcontrol]

In order of priority, the factors that matter most for an entry-level teaching position are:

(1) Publications
(2) References
(3) Credentials

Since most competitive candidates have one or two published pieces, and faculty support happens behind closed doors, (3) looks like it has outsize influence. It does not. Your list of publications and the professors/judges going to bat for you matter much more than where and how well you did in school (which is not to say that importance is trivial). In any case, transferring may help a bit with (3) but you'll be a year behind in building the relationships you need; possibly you could strengthen those relationships by clerking, but that too will be difficult as a transfer. If you stay, you may be able to accumulate stronger faculty support, but your credentials will be relatively weak. Unless you publish an article or two of real note, that will likely sink you as compared to equally accomplished candidates who went to better schools (of which there are many).

In short, it's a very long shot for you to get a teaching job. Not impossible, but a very long shot. If you get into HYSCCN, you should probably transfer, but not for academia; rather, you should transfer because those schools position you better for getting a non-teaching job.

[concurrent fork]

In order of priority, the factors that matter most for an entry-level teaching position are:

(1) Publications
(2) References
(3) Credentials

Since most competitive candidates have one or two published pieces, and faculty support happens behind closed doors, (3) looks like it has outsize influence. It does not. Your list of publications and the professors/judges going to bat for you matter much more than where and how well you did in school (which is not to say that importance is trivial). In any case, transferring may help a bit with (3) but you'll be a year behind in building the relationships you need; possibly you could strengthen those relationships by clerking, but that too will be difficult as a transfer. If you stay, you may be able to accumulate stronger faculty support, but your credentials will be relatively weak. Unless you publish an article or two of real note, that will likely sink you as compared to equally accomplished candidates who went to better schools (of which there are many).

In short, it's a very long shot for you to get a teaching job. Not impossible, but a very long shot. If you get into HYSCCN, you should probably transfer, but not for academia; rather, you should transfer because those schools position you better for getting a non-teaching job.

I don't know that this is accurate. There are tons of kids at TTT schools that get published and have great references. Yet the data shows a massive skew towards HY. I think your chances for academia are better at HY without law review than at a random T50 with law review. I think you're right though for CCN on down.

[lawyerwannabe]

In order of priority, the factors that matter most for an entry-level teaching position are:

(1) Publications
(2) References
(3) Credentials

Since most competitive candidates have one or two published pieces, and faculty support happens behind closed doors, (3) looks like it has outsize influence. It does not. Your list of publications and the professors/judges going to bat for you matter much more than where and how well you did in school (which is not to say that importance is trivial). In any case, transferring may help a bit with (3) but you'll be a year behind in building the relationships you need; possibly you could strengthen those relationships by clerking, but that too will be difficult as a transfer. If you stay, you may be able to accumulate stronger faculty support, but your credentials will be relatively weak. Unless you publish an article or two of real note, that will likely sink you as compared to equally accomplished candidates who went to better schools (of which there are many).

In short, it's a very long shot for you to get a teaching job. Not impossible, but a very long shot. If you get into HYSCCN, you should probably transfer, but not for academia; rather, you should transfer because those schools position you better for getting a non-teaching job.

I don't know that this is accurate. There are tons of kids at TTT schools that get published and have great references. Yet the data shows a massive skew towards HY. I think your chances for academia are better at HY without law review than at a random T50 with law review. I think you're right though for CCN on down.

You can just quote my post from above if you want.

[aca0260]

OP - you are asking the wrong people. Whoever is saying that you should stay and publish as much as you can likely has no clue what they're talking about with regards to the path towards legal academia. It seems clear that an elite university is a prerequisite (as in a necessary, not sufficient condition for your LSAT aces).

Go talk to professors at your school. They won't be offended you're considering transferring - they will likely encourage it given your goals. Also, go through the faculty credentials of your school and I'm sure you won't find many (or any) tenured professors from schools below Texas/Vandy.

[Blessedassurance]

Relevant:

http://ww3.lawschool.cornell.edu/facult ... aching.htm

[Younger Abstention]

Relevant:

http://ww3.lawschool.cornell.edu/facult ... aching.htm

Good info, but the "Wendel test" didn't really work so hot. It seems quite doable to attain an academic position at a lower ranked (Tier 4) law school, even without absolutely stellar credentials. To get a job at a tier 1, or even top 100 law school, or one in a particularly desirable location is a different story.