SMU v. UHLC Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:54 am
SMU v. UHLC
I'm interested in hearing which law school TLS users would choose to attend as a transfer. I'm aware that they are both regional schools, and I'll likely end up practicing in Texas after attending either of them. Does anyone think attending SMU is worth the extra $14,000 a year? Thanks for any input.
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 pm
Re: SMU v. UHLC
UH for Houston.
SMU for Dallas.
Really, it's that simple.
If you can't decide which market you prefer, most people that opine on the topic suggest the Houston legal market has weathered ITE better than Dallas. Combined with the lower COA, UH would seem like the way to go.
SMU for Dallas.
Really, it's that simple.
If you can't decide which market you prefer, most people that opine on the topic suggest the Houston legal market has weathered ITE better than Dallas. Combined with the lower COA, UH would seem like the way to go.
- deadpanic
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:09 pm
Re: SMU v. UHLC
SMU is probably not worth sticker, UH probably is (assuming in-state)
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:52 pm
Re: SMU v. UHLC
nouseforaname123 wrote:UH for Houston.
SMU for Dallas.
Really, it's that simple.
If you can't decide which market you prefer, most people that opine on the topic suggest the Houston legal market has weathered ITE better than Dallas. Combined with the lower COA, UH would seem like the way to go.
Very true. Houston is a better market currently than Dallas. UH is a fantastic school and I don't see paying 14k more worth it. UH would be better choice.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:23 pm
Re: SMU v. UHLC
Unless you have specific plans to get back to Dallas, your only factor would be money. Therefore, I'd have to go with UH as well Good luck to you!
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: SMU v. UHLC
UHouston is the better investment for Houston, SMU for Dallas (but not at sticker). At sticker price, it really depends upon the individual's circumstances, in my opinion.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login