Tier 3 v. Michigan Forum

A forum for those current students who are or may be transferring from one school to another. Post any questions, advice, or other transfer related comments here.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Should I Stay or Should I Go

Stay at current school with all the bells and whistles
41
54%
Go to Michigan
35
46%
 
Total votes: 76

transfer4545

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:17 am

Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by transfer4545 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:15 am

I have recently been admitted to UofM as a transfer student but am having cold feet about walking away from a full-ride, law review, and #1 ranking at a neighboring TTT. My goal is to work for a big firm in either Grand Rapids or Detroit. My concern is whether by transferring to Michigan I will wind up with the same job that I would have had if I had stayed at the TTT but paid $90k more for it. I am extremely risk adverse and have heard things on ATL that say some less than impressive things about Michigan's career services and the fate of some of their students.

I know that it's pretty hard to find jobs coming out of any law school ITE, let alone a TTT, but I am clinging to the thought that the #1 ranking at the state's arguably #2 law school would give me a chance to be making six figures in Michigan with zero debt upon graduation.

Is this analysis too short sighted? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks!
Last edited by transfer4545 on Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:05 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
holydonkey

Silver
Posts: 1181
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by holydonkey » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:39 am

If big law is hiring in Detroit, I can't imagine they wouldn't take the #1 student at Wayne State or Michigan State. Maybe it does make sense to stay if you know you want to stay in Michigan. It's not like you're thinking about Chicago, NYC, or DC. If the money was the same, I would think transferring is obviously the right call, but the cost difference is pretty big. I still think I would transfer if only because Mich would give you options in Chicago/Columbus if Detroit just isn't hiring and you're only paying 2 years of tuition. I don't know, really tough call man.

User avatar
thexfactor

Silver
Posts: 1291
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:40 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by thexfactor » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:42 am

i think this is one of the few cases that I would say stay at your school.

Most of the people at biglaw firms in detroit graudated from msu/wayne UD....
Being number 1 will help A LOT in motown.

chitown825

Bronze
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:45 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by chitown825 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:44 am

Stay. Congratulations on your acceptance, though, but you deserve even more congratulations for your #1 ranking, LR, and full ride.

CanadianWolf

Diamond
Posts: 11453
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by CanadianWolf » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:04 am

Your analysis is not short-sighted, although probably a bit provincial. The irony is that the third tier law school scholarship that grants you the financial freedom to pursue any path, also restricts you geographically in a practical sense because it is a tier three law school. So the real issue may be what type of freedom do you want more--financial or geographical?.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
romothesavior

Diamond
Posts: 14692
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by romothesavior » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:14 am

Stay.

User avatar
trialjunky

Silver
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:41 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by trialjunky » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:16 am

I'm jumping on the stay bandwagon (You should create a poll)!

solidsnake

Silver
Posts: 530
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by solidsnake » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:17 am

I think you should transfer. The quality of your classmates is half of your legal education. And career plans change. Go to a school your kids will be proud of.

User avatar
nealric

Moderator
Posts: 4391
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by nealric » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:19 am

I would transfer in a heartbeat. Although it isn't fair, many people will still see you as a "TTT Graduate" regardless of where you rank. UM will command respect no matter where you end up ranking there.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
MrKappus

Gold
Posts: 1685
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:46 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by MrKappus » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:59 am

If you want Grand Rapids/Detroit and are debt averse, you have little to gain by going to Mich. They have a huge class and their OCI's not great (by T14 standards).

User avatar
seespotrun

Gold
Posts: 2394
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by seespotrun » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:02 am

If Biglaw in your home market is the be-all-end-all for you, then you have nothing to gain except prestige. Prestige is something that you'll have to value. You have to ask yourself if the prestige of a Mich. JD is worth ~$90k? If yes, transfer. If not, stick around.

User avatar
najumobi

Silver
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by najumobi » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:18 am

iyou'll definitely land that big law job in detroit. if you want to move to a different region after a couple of years it will probably be the caliber of your work at that firm that will determine how easy or hard it will be for you to move.

save yourself 90k.

jdhonest

Bronze
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:31 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by jdhonest » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:19 am

the driving question(s) for the OP should be the following: are you certain that you'd like to work in those cities for the rest of your life? At your age, how certain can you be of anything?

No offense to your home state, but you may find that career and life opportunities are more abundant elsewhere, making your decision to stay something of a liability. 90k can be paid back, but there's no LRAP for life regret. Good luck with your decision.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
vanwinkle

Platinum
Posts: 8953
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by vanwinkle » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:27 am

You might be the rare person who should stay. However, give it serious thought. If you want the law firm salary you'll be in a position to pay off $90K or so within a few years, especially with the low COL there. It might be worth the extra money. On the other hand, you'll be at Michigan, but just some guy at Michigan... Giving up #1 status and LR and everything is a lot. If anyone can get a job from your school ITE, you already know it's you. You'll be building your reputation up again from the ground up at Mich.

Good luck. It's a tough call.

oscarthegrouch

New
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:23 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by oscarthegrouch » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:33 am

MrKappus wrote:If you want Grand Rapids/Detroit and are debt averse, you have little to gain by going to Mich. They have a huge class and their OCI's not great (by T14 standards).
Based on what I have heard, Mich placed at least as well as the t-14, minus HYSCCN, at OCI.

It's a tough choice though. Getting into a large firm in Detroit is pretty competitive, and based on GPA data I have seen, more competitive than large primary markets like NYC and Chicago (at least from the t-14). I don't know anything about Grand Rapids, but if you want to work for a place like Honigman, you typically need better grades than you do for the main markets.

OnWisconsin

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:02 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by OnWisconsin » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:57 am

If you're considering GR, and I would, Eastern Michigan sans Ann Arbor and the surrounding burbs is a festering wound on the state (nation?), I would say GO BLUE.

GR is an extreme example of the "good ol' boy" mentality. To initialy open doors in that town you really need one of two things, either be born and raised in East Grand Rapids and have played lacrosse with a partners son in HS, or have a big fat M stamped on your forehead.

I lived in GR for a few years, did some networking before law school to get a lay of the land, and was pretty much told by a partner at Miller Johnson over lunch that they summarily pitch applications that don't come from prestigious institutions or if they don't alreayd have an "in" with the firm.

That being said, you still might have more latitude because of your class rank. Just know GR is operated by old school, white, Dutch (better have Van or De in front of your name), men with a death grip on the helm.
Last edited by OnWisconsin on Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.

selfloathingtransfer

Bronze
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:58 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by selfloathingtransfer » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:02 pm

I think the key question is whether OP prefers to have more financial freedom straight out of law school or more geographic freedom. Financial = Stay, Geographic = UM.

Also, while OP is probably going to keep a very high ranking, there's no guarantee OP will keep THE #1 ranking. What if OP slips to . . . #2, #5? How much does that change things, if at all?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
romothesavior

Diamond
Posts: 14692
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by romothesavior » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:06 pm

The problem with making a poll like this is that many people just vote without even reading the thread. They see T10 vs. TTT and they just vote impulsively.

IMO, this is not that hard of a decision: gunning for the Michigan market as the #1 person in your class with law review and little debt is INFINITELY better than being a transfer to Michigan with potentially no law review and 6 figures of debt. I'd really like to hear from the 12 who voted otherwise.

User avatar
seespotrun

Gold
Posts: 2394
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by seespotrun » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:13 pm

selfloathingtransfer wrote:.
Also, while OP is probably going to keep a very high ranking, there's no guarantee OP will keep THE #1 ranking. What if OP slips to . . . #2, #5? How much does that change things, if at all?
It doesn't change things at all. He wants Biglaw, not a fed. clerkship.

User avatar
ggocat

Gold
Posts: 1825
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by ggocat » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:15 pm

vanwinkle wrote:Good luck. It's a tough call.
This. I don't think there is a "right" answer economically (i.e., whether $90K plus interest is "worth" the Michigan degree in a monetary, career improvement sense). And if there is a right answer, you'll never know with certainty.

Nealric's comment is probably accurate -- you will likely have more credibility/respect coming from Michigan, at least with people who don't know you well (maybe opposing counsel, judges).

I think seespotrun's comment touches on something important -- this is likely an intangible decision. Some people would (and do) pay a lot more than $90K plus interest for a Michigan degree. But keep in mind that some people pay a lot more than $90K for a TTT degree. The value of the degree is different for different people.

I voted to stay, partly because I like being an underdog; that's just who I am. But mostly I voted to stay because you never know you'll want to stay in biglaw for the long haul, and having the extra $90K plus interest in the early party of your career will allow you to be less tied to the biglaw job.

kazootey

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:35 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by kazootey » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:18 pm

Here's my question: Who is more likely to be a better lawyer, a middling UM law student, or a student at the very top of a TTT class?

Is being #1 at a third tier institution really that great? I am not asking to sound like a jerk, but from reading TLS it sounds like most TTT's are not worth going to (which I disagree with). I don't know for myself, hence the question.

Oh, and since I am a Wolverine myself, GO BLUE! Go to Ann Arbor and don't look back.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
romothesavior

Diamond
Posts: 14692
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by romothesavior » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:27 pm

kazootey wrote:Here's my question: Who is more likely to be a better lawyer, a middling UM law student, or a student at the very top of a TTT class?
This question is loaded, silly, and irrelevent to whether or not OP should transfer or not.

270910

Gold
Posts: 2431
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by 270910 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:30 pm

One of the toughest calls I've ever seen. I lean towards stay, given that you are actually numero uno. But even I am unsure of myself...

270910

Gold
Posts: 2431
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by 270910 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:31 pm

kazootey wrote:Here's my question: Who is more likely to be a better lawyer, a middling UM law student, or a student at the very top of a TTT class?

Is being #1 at a third tier institution really that great? I am not asking to sound like a jerk, but from reading TLS it sounds like most TTT's are not worth going to (which I disagree with). I don't know for myself, hence the question.

Oh, and since I am a Wolverine myself, GO BLUE! Go to Ann Arbor and don't look back.
First year law school exam performance is a very poor proxy for ability as a lawyer. Just like the LSAT, if you look at a large enough sample you'll see enough correlation to allow you to use (the LSAT or the 1L GPA/law school) as a proxy for hiring decisions, but looking at any small set of individuals and trying to predict lawyering ability would be farcical.
Last edited by 270910 on Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kazootey

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:35 pm

Re: Tier 3 v. Michigan

Post by kazootey » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:32 pm

romothesavior wrote:
kazootey wrote:Here's my question: Who is more likely to be a better lawyer, a middling UM law student, or a student at the very top of a TTT class?
This question is loaded, silly, and irrelevent to whether or not OP should transfer or not.
I don't care about the impact of this on the decision, I just want to know.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Transfers”