letsgetsomeshoes wrote:I'm terrble at math, so forgive me for asking a dumb question.
How do you think admissions officers compare class ranks of applicants from differently ranked schools? For example, how would a student who is ranked in the top 10% at a school in the 90s compare to a student in the top 20% at a school in the 60s? Or what about a student who is in the top 5% at a t3 school compared to a student in the top 25% at a high T2 school?
Hopefully this makes sense. Any insight would be much appreciated

It really just depends on:
1) the rank of the two schools
2) the region of the two schools
3) if the employer hires graduates from both schools
4) if the students have connections to the city that the employer is in
5) what prior to law school experience the two students have
6) what in law school experience the two students have
7) etc.
It is impossible to direclty compare 2 students from different schools. People like to pretend that X rank for student A is equal to Y rank for student B at a different school. Ultimately, this cannot be decided even if you had two students by name and exact rank for comparison because that is simply not enough information. Granted, some schools at the very top are preferable; however, some students at lower ranked schools are related to major clients or equity partners and so they can sometimes "win" in a particular situation.