A'nold wrote:UCLAtransfer wrote:I went through this exact paranoia last year around this time. I'm pretty sure its all I thought about for a good three months.
If you wanted to keep this as a venting-only thread with no "silver lining" discussion, I apologize in advance for being optimistic, haha:
Looking back on the last three semesters of law school for me, I have done a little bit better each semester, even after transferring. I think if you do as well as it seems you folks did after first semester (top 10%, 5%, 1%, etc.), it means that you just "get" law school exams. Not to say you don't have to keep working at it to maintain that edge, but from my close group of friends who were all top 5-10% after 1L, there is a lot of inherent ability there that many others just don't have.
All that to say, keep up the hard work as best you can and I'm confident you will end up being pleasantly surprised.
Great post and I also congratulate you on your successful transfer to UCLA. Do you think you could add how you did on that whole transfer thread where no one will give specifics? Or you could do it here, if you feel comfortable.
Yeah, glad to help. I transferred almost entirely for location (wanted to get back out to the West (Best) Coast where I am from), and a little bit for the prestige/better opportunities.
As with many other TLS transfers, I struck out at OCI. I would say for UCLA in general it was pretty close to the 50/50 point that some other posters have discussed in other threads. (About half the transfers I know received at least 1 offer, and the other half got nothing.)
I can't speak to everyone else's situation obviously, but I think my lack of success came down to two key reasons:
(1) I ended up with too many interviews with really highly-ranked firms. (V10-V25.) This was partially just luck of the draw and partially my own fault. The part that was luck of the draw was the phenomenon that others have described, where people bid low or not at all on the most competitive, highly-ranked firms. While I only bid high on 1 such firm that I had a bit of a connection to, I ended up with a lot of interviews with these firms since a lot of people simply didn't bid on them at all. The part that was my fault was bidding on these firms at all. I looked at a list of the firms that had taken the most UCLA transfers over the previous 5 years, and made sure to at least place a bid on them (however low). This resulted in me getting about 75% of my interviews with "reach" and "not a chance" firms.
(2) I transferred from a T2 on the East Coast that just didn't have much of a presence or name-recognition out West, so I think that I was somewhat of an "unknown" for the firms I was interviewing with. Many of the transfers who came from schools like Loyola, USD, Hastings, Davis, SCU, etc. ended up doing a little bit better because I think interviewers knew what the grades from those schools meant, having recruited from there (in better years).
Together, I think these two problems led to the perfect storm of me striking out at fall-OCI.
With all of that said, however, all is not lost for me. I ended up getting an offer from a mid-sized firm in LA that I am very excited about, and while it doesn't quite pay big law salary, its close. Also, I feel that I won't have to worry about getting no-offered at the end, since this firm didn't do any of the 30%, 50% offer rate stuff that big firms did last summer.
Overall, since my goals were to get back out to LA, attend a school that I enjoy more, and find a job that I think I will really like, I still consider transferring a success.
Feel free to question away!