+1 to all of this.nadopretz wrote: edit: I hope this negativity doesn't make me a troll. I am just getting to the "fuck this" stage, while secretly hoping that everything magically works out... at least there is still Yale looming in the background, though I don't have a shot at that either.
Harvard 2012 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: Harvard 2012
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:01 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
I went straight from Application Ready for Review as of 07/06 to the acceptance email and status tracker change. There was no "Under Review" stage for me. Congratulations to all those in, and I hope good news arrives for all of you!
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:28 am
Re: Harvard 2012
Given the sequence that many admits provide, it seems that my "ready for review" since 06/20 without change or admission so far is a sure indicator that I have been dinged.
I am Top 3% at T20. Am I that out of the picture?
I am Top 3% at T20. Am I that out of the picture?
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
Your numbers seem competitive. I know that last year, a girl with a lower class rank than I have was admitted from my school, and ostensibly those numbers/school are less competitive than yours. The fact that applications like yours and several other posters ITT are still pending makes me think that there may well be a third wave, but that's probably just wishful thinking.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:38 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
.
Last edited by KindleNexusfan on Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
I have taken the liberty of setting up a great thread for all the new admits who want to discuss all these sorts of topics:KindleNexusfan wrote:Has anybody from this year received the admit letter/packet yet? If not, can anyone lurking from last year let me know what's in it? Also, any other admits who want to talk about bidding and courses or 2011 transfers who have advice send me a PM.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=189033
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:34 am
Re: Harvard 2012
Haha, nicely done!nadopretz wrote:
I have taken the liberty of setting up a great thread for all the new admits who want to discuss all these sorts of topics:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=189033
-
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
FYI -- rejections via email in the next week or two per admissions. Not really any new information, but thought I would post it anyway.
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
that information is far less helpful without accompanying information about whether additional waves of acceptances will come out lol
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:34 am
Re: Harvard 2012
I think we can safely infer there will be more admits though, otherwise the rejection letters would just go out now.pballer wrote:that information is far less helpful without accompanying information about whether additional waves of acceptances will come out lol
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
I'm hesitant to infer anything from admissions committee actions
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 1:48 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
I just listened to the theme music from Rudy, and I feel like I'm going to get in today.
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:34 am
Re: Harvard 2012
I mean, I suppose that they could just let us linger (did you have to? did you have to?) knowing that they weren't planning on taking any other students, but I really doubt that when all it would take is an email. Maybe it's as Nadopretz says and now there is a final review for posterity or something, but this also seems unlikely to take 1-2 weeks if they are planning on simply rejecting everyone.pballer wrote:I'm hesitant to infer anything from admissions committee actions
I want finality on this just as much as everyone else, but unfortunately, there is probably a reason not to give up hope quite yet.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
FlanSolo, I think I love you.
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
Oh believe me, I hope that you're rightFlanSolo wrote:I mean, I suppose that they could just let us linger (did you have to? did you have to?) knowing that they weren't planning on taking any other students, but I really doubt that when all it would take is an email. Maybe it's as Nadopretz says and now there is a final review for posterity or something, but this also seems unlikely to take 1-2 weeks if they are planning on simply rejecting everyone.pballer wrote:I'm hesitant to infer anything from admissions committee actions
I want finality on this just as much as everyone else, but unfortunately, there is probably a reason not to give up hope quite yet.

-
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
+1. I may be a super downer, but I agree with FlanSolo -- They are likely confirming the bulk of the rejections, but I also don't think they are going to reject all of us, I imagine they are going to keep a couple of us hanging on until the final hours just to make sure they fill all their seats... And to torture us.mileslibertatis wrote:FlanSolo, I think I love you.
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:34 am
Re: Harvard 2012
Providing an incongruous blend of cynicism and irrational optimism since 1984!mileslibertatis wrote:FlanSolo, I think I love you.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:34 am
Re: Harvard 2012
Yep - I think is right. I'd like to think that if I fall into such a category of admits I could turn around and satisfyingly reject them, but we all know that's not going to happen.nadopretz wrote:I may be a super downer, but I agree with FlanSolo -- They are likely confirming the bulk of the rejections, but I also don't think they are going to reject all of us, I imagine they are going to keep a couple of us hanging on until the final hours just to make sure they fill all their seats... And to torture us.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:28 am
Re: Harvard 2012
Following the post above, as I am losing hope, in terms of the transfer hierachy of law schools, which is higher, H or S?
- PinkCow
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:03 am
Re: Harvard 2012
IMO, once you're in the Top-3, it doesn't really matter. Stanford will likely have more pull in CA, but either one is the bee's knees.lockiller wrote:Following the post above, as I am losing hope, in terms of the transfer hierachy of law schools, which is higher, H or S?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
Stanford pulled ahead in the US News rankings this year, but everyone knows the 2 and 3 spots are interchangeable. If one law firm this year gave S a 4 and H a 5 and next year gives them both 5s, that is probably enough to put H back at 2.
My impression is that H is better for business-y type law and generally in the Northeast, and S is better for academic-y and technology-y type law and will be dominant in CA. But my impression is silly.
My impression is that H is better for business-y type law and generally in the Northeast, and S is better for academic-y and technology-y type law and will be dominant in CA. But my impression is silly.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:28 am
Re: Harvard 2012
IPinkCow wrote:IMO, once you're in the Top-3, it doesn't really matter. Stanford will likely have more pull in CA, but either one is the bee's knees.lockiller wrote:Following the post above, as I am losing hope, in terms of the transfer hierachy of law schools, which is higher, H or S?
Last edited by lockiller on Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2012
Anyone who wants to decline Harvard, feel free to go ahead and do so. Also, mention my name.
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: Harvard 2012
Who's getting excited for another round of 5:00PM emails?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login