Official Columbia Transfer Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- samiseaborn
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:55 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Just wondering who else hasn't heard anything yet? Been complete since 7/14 which wasn't that long ago, but since others have heard that went complete after than that...
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Could just be a matter of where you live. I went complete on the 14th and got a rejection mailed to my suburban Philly home by the 21st. If you live farther, it may take another day or two. There's not much evidence they're still admitting people.
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:36 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Anyone know how large the transfer class is supposed to be? When I spoke with a career counselor assigned to me, she stated it was "around 20". I don't know how accurate that is though; I had always assumed more.
- samiseaborn
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:55 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
I actually live closer than that and haven't gotten anything, so I'm currently holding my breath that the mailman isn't just playing games with me.
Edit: wasn't last year's class closer to 50?!
Edit: wasn't last year's class closer to 50?!
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Wayyyy more. I think it was 90 last year. Search the forums for transfer data in/out; there was a thread on this with the numbers.Machine Spirit wrote:Anyone know how large the transfer class is supposed to be? When I spoke with a career counselor assigned to me, she stated it was "around 20". I don't know how accurate that is though; I had always assumed more.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- EggShellPlaintiff
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 10:40 am
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
They could be drastically reducing it. I have a lot of friends from UG that are at CLS now who have told me there was a big movement amongst the "regular" students to limit the number of transfers accepted this year. They had a huge petition going around that they presented to the Dean and Dean of Admissions and everything. Apparently, many people were unhappy with the number of transfers students last year (78, which is a lot), and many people also thought that transfers took jobs away from the rest of the population, which could be true. I friend told me that only a few (maybe 5 or 6) transfers didn't get jobs last year through OCI, while 1/3 of the general Columbia population got nothing.
- bizen boat
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:55 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Dey took yer jerbs!!!
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Yeah, that's probably because the overwhelming majority of transfers were at the top of the class 1L and had demonstrated legal talent insofar as exams indicate that; and the 1/3 of the general CLS population that got nothing were probably mostly concentrated in the bottom 1/3 of the class. Those over-entitled shitheads should realize that firms likely don't want people who can't succeed where it counts while under pressure.EggShellPlaintiff wrote: Apparently, many people were unhappy with the number of transfers students last year (78, which is a lot), and many people also thought that transfers took jobs away from the rest of the population, which could be true. I friend told me that only a few (maybe 5 or 6) transfers didn't get jobs last year through OCI, while 1/3 of the general Columbia population got nothing.
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
That's some serious carnage.EggShellPlaintiff wrote:1/3 of the general Columbia population got nothing.
- CG614
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Really? Being graded on a curve against some other seriously talented people shouldn't matter? So, going to a T4 with very limited competition and getting into CLS via transfer, should trump someone that was able to get into CLS to start and happened to be in the bottom third based on 6-7 classes? Yeah, that sounds about right.solidsnake wrote:Yeah, that's probably because the overwhelming majority of transfers were at the top of the class 1L and had demonstrated legal talent insofar as exams indicate that; and the 1/3 of the general CLS population that got nothing were probably mostly concentrated in the bottom 1/3 of the class. Those over-entitled shitheads should realize that firms likely don't want people who can't succeed where it counts while under pressure.EggShellPlaintiff wrote: Apparently, many people were unhappy with the number of transfers students last year (78, which is a lot), and many people also thought that transfers took jobs away from the rest of the population, which could be true. I friend told me that only a few (maybe 5 or 6) transfers didn't get jobs last year through OCI, while 1/3 of the general Columbia population got nothing.
- bizen boat
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:55 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
To be fair, I heard that the t4 transfers struck out at OCI. It was the t25 top 5% kids that beat out bottom 1/3 at Columbia. Presumably, they would have beat out bottom 1/3 at Columbia had they stayed at their T25's. That doesn't sound wrong to me.CG614 wrote:Really? Being graded on a curve against some other seriously talented people shouldn't matter? So, going to a T4 with very limited competition and getting into CLS via transfer, should trump someone that was able to get into CLS to start and happened to be in the bottom third based on 6-7 classes? Yeah, that sounds about right.solidsnake wrote:Yeah, that's probably because the overwhelming majority of transfers were at the top of the class 1L and had demonstrated legal talent insofar as exams indicate that; and the 1/3 of the general CLS population that got nothing were probably mostly concentrated in the bottom 1/3 of the class. Those over-entitled shitheads should realize that firms likely don't want people who can't succeed where it counts while under pressure.EggShellPlaintiff wrote: Apparently, many people were unhappy with the number of transfers students last year (78, which is a lot), and many people also thought that transfers took jobs away from the rest of the population, which could be true. I friend told me that only a few (maybe 5 or 6) transfers didn't get jobs last year through OCI, while 1/3 of the general Columbia population got nothing.
- EggShellPlaintiff
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 10:40 am
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Does Columbia take people from T4 schools?
Anyway, what you're saying is somewhat true, most of the kids that struck out came from the T3 NYC area schools that wouldn't have gotten jobs anyway.
Edit: Nevermind, I remember from TransferApps that they did take someone last year from Touro. Redacted.
Anyway, what you're saying is somewhat true, most of the kids that struck out came from the T3 NYC area schools that wouldn't have gotten jobs anyway.
Edit: Nevermind, I remember from TransferApps that they did take someone last year from Touro. Redacted.
- bizen boat
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:55 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
I really have no idea, as I have no affiliation with CLS. I was mostly just responding to CG614's really bad argument that relied on the assumption that Columbia not only took t4 students, but these cretins were the very people taking "real" Columbia students' jerbs.
Then I looked as his profile and saw he was an 0L about to attend Columbia and it all made sense...
Then I looked as his profile and saw he was an 0L about to attend Columbia and it all made sense...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 7:03 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Makes me sad - I went complete within the last few days, if they're no longer admitting - I'd rather a refund than a rejection letter heh
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:06 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
They're still admitting students. I was admitted yesterday.WesttoEast wrote:Makes me sad - I went complete within the last few days, if they're no longer admitting - I'd rather a refund than a rejection letter heh
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
you do realize this is a thread that is full of people who are a part of, or are trying to become a part of, the group that you're calling "over-entitled shitheads," right?solidsnake wrote:Those over-entitled shitheads.
I would think that transfer students would want to integrate with the Columbia community, and not perpetuate any us vs. them mentality that might exist.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
assimilation ftwholborn wrote:you do realize this is a thread that is full of people who are a part of, or are trying to become a part of, the group that you're calling "over-entitled shitheads," right?solidsnake wrote:Those over-entitled shitheads.
I would think that transfer students would want to integrate with the Columbia community, and not perpetuate any us vs. them mentality that might exist.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
"[O]ver-entitled" refers to any law student who believes that they deserve a firm job by virtue of pedigree alone, regardless of class rank. "holborn wrote:you do realize this is a thread that is full of people who are a part of, or are trying to become a part of, the group that you're calling "over-entitled shitheads," right?solidsnake wrote:Those over-entitled shitheads.
I would think that transfer students would want to integrate with the Columbia community, and not perpetuate any us vs. them mentality that might exist.
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
its probably less that they think that the transfers are less worthy/dumber/TTT and more that if columbia hadn't let in almost 100 transfers, their own shot at a job might be higher. granted, maybe they should have thought of that before picking columbia (which is known for a larger than average transfer class), but still.solidsnake wrote:"[O]ver-entitled shitheads" refers to any law student who believes that they deserve a firm job by virtue of pedigree alone, regardless of class rank.holborn wrote:you do realize this is a thread that is full of people who are a part of, or are trying to become a part of, the group that you're calling "over-entitled shitheads," right?solidsnake wrote:Those over-entitled shitheads.
I would think that transfer students would want to integrate with the Columbia community, and not perpetuate any us vs. them mentality that might exist.
- CG614
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
I was just stating that I could see the current student's side of the story. I was using an extreme example that may not even be the case. Calm down people. I don't agree with that viewpoint, but I do feel like CLS does have some responsibility to their current students. So if the economy is making it harder and lessening the incoming transfer class can help, then it should entertain doing so.bizen boat wrote:I really have no idea, as I have no affiliation with CLS. I was mostly just responding to CG614's really bad argument that relied on the assumption that Columbia not only took t4 students, but these cretins were the very people taking "real" Columbia students' jerbs.
Then I looked as his profile and saw he was an 0L about to attend Columbia and it all made sense...
EDIT to add: You say you have "no idea" but in your prior post you say "I heard that T4 transfers struck out...". Which is it?
- bizen boat
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:55 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Both, in a way. I have no real idea because I don't go to CLS. I heard on this forum that lower tier transfers struck out while T25 students did well. If my first post made it seem like I had inside knowledge then I'm sorry. Also, I agree that taking 90+ transfer students is excessive and can see how that may cause tension.CG614 wrote:I was just stating that I could see the current student's side of the story. I was using an extreme example that may not even be the case. Calm down people. I don't agree with that viewpoint, but I do feel like CLS does have some responsibility to their current students. So if the economy is making it harder and lessening the incoming transfer class can help, then it should entertain doing so.bizen boat wrote:I really have no idea, as I have no affiliation with CLS. I was mostly just responding to CG614's really bad argument that relied on the assumption that Columbia not only took t4 students, but these cretins were the very people taking "real" Columbia students' jerbs.
Then I looked as his profile and saw he was an 0L about to attend Columbia and it all made sense...
EDIT to add: You say you have "no idea" but in your prior post you say "I heard that T4 transfers struck out...". Which is it?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
When is OCI at CLS?
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
.
Last edited by mardimar on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
Harvard took you, Columbia didn't? Maybe it really is a more selective year for Columbia.mardimar wrote:ding. yesterday. snail mail.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Re: Official Columbia Transfer Thread
.
Last edited by mardimar on Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login