FML - Cali Schools 2013 Forum
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:11 pm
FML - Cali Schools 2013
--LinkRemoved--
/wrists.
/wrists.
- Cavalier
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:13 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
What isn't wrong with California.
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:11 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
USD and their schollys are looking mighty good.Cavalier wrote:What isn't wrong with California.
- rondemarino
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:29 am
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
Cavalier wrote:What isn't wrong with California.
This
--ImageRemoved--
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:12 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
the elitism really drools from Elie sometimes.Non-resident students should either get into Stanford or stay the hell out of California.
I mean, what about USC?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:11 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
Unfortunately this is starting to seem to apply to us in-staters alsolegends159 wrote:Non-resident students should either get into Stanford or stay the hell out of California.
- Cavalier
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:13 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
That would require being associated with the Trojans. Which, of course, is a terrible idea.legends159 wrote:the elitism really drools from Elie sometimes.Non-resident students should either get into Stanford or stay the hell out of California.
I mean, what about USC?
-
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
good pointrondemarino wrote:Cavalier wrote:What isn't wrong with California.
This
--ImageRemoved--
- 98234872348
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
Does it strike anyone else as ironic that the schools (well, Berkeley at least) are increasing tuition costs so that they can expand their LRAP offerings?
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:11 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
I was thinking that also, but what it sounds like to me is that the school is going to accept people that are willing to pay ticket price (those people who are at the median or below) and then grant the extra money to those that are above median. This way the school is getting more tuition without looking like a total moneysucker. So where in '09 you had people paying lets say $40k ticket, and those above were paying lets say $35k, the school bumps it to $50k, gives a $10k grant to those that did ok, so those are paying $40k, and since they used the money from the person who payed$50k, its like they had a steady stream of $40k tuition.mistergoft wrote:Does it strike anyone else as ironic that the schools (well, Berkeley at least) are increasing tuition costs so that they can expand their LRAP offerings?
It's all a bunch of BS imo
- MC Southstar
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
They should just accept more students That's not economically sound either though, oh well.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
Oh you mean the Hastings approach? Right...shadowfrost000 wrote:They should just accept more students That's not economically sound either though, oh well.
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:11 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
LOLswheat wrote:Oh you mean the Hastings approach? Right...shadowfrost000 wrote:They should just accept more students That's not economically sound either though, oh well.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LvingLegend
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
I was really hoping to stay in California. Oh well.
- johnstuartmill
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:53 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
Not at all. Why should the government subsidize the tuition of students who will be making a lot of money after they graduate, and not producing a lot of public benefit? The low UC law school tuition of yore was a giveaway to people who patently didn't need it. It makes a lot more sense to raise tuition for everybody, thus generating cash to blunt the debt load of alumni working in the public or non-profit sectors, who presumably will be underpaid compared to the amount of social benefit they create. Gotta internalize that externality, yo.mistergoft wrote:Does it strike anyone else as ironic that the schools (well, Berkeley at least) are increasing tuition costs so that they can expand their LRAP offerings?
-
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:11 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
johnstuartmill wrote:Not at all. Why should the government subsidize the tuition of students who will be making a lot of money after they graduate, and not producing a lot of public benefit? The low UC law school tuition of yore was a giveaway to people who patently didn't need it. It makes a lot more sense to raise tuition for everybody, thus generating cash to give to public servant and non-profit alumni, who presumably will be underpaid compared to the amount of social benefit they create. Gotta internalize that externality, yo.mistergoft wrote:Does it strike anyone else as ironic that the schools (well, Berkeley at least) are increasing tuition costs so that they can expand their LRAP offerings?
Davis is increasing tuition, but raising financial aid also. The thing is, just about any Tier 1 school will have plenty of applicants who will be willing to pay full price tuition. I view this as accepting a bit more less qualified (on numbers alone) to pay full tuition and then give a bunch more financial aid to people with average/better than average numbers. This will allow the school to operate with the new f*d budget and allow students with decent numbers to attend the school at about the same price as last year.
- bloodonthetracks
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
i recommend reading the article on UC in last week's New Yorker
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- johnstuartmill
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:53 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
We're talking about different things. I was responding to a post about a national school's (i.e., lots of out-of-state tuition payers anyway) expansion of LRAP, not about a good regional school's possible USNWR gaming.Inygma wrote:Davis is increasing tuition, but raising financial aid also. The thing is, just about any Tier 1 school will have plenty of applicants who will be willing to pay full price tuition. I view this as accepting a bit more less qualified (on numbers alone) to pay full tuition and then give a bunch more financial aid to people with average/better than average numbers. This will allow the school to operate with the new f*d budget and allow students with decent numbers to attend the school at about the same price as last year.johnstuartmill wrote:Not at all. Why should the government subsidize the tuition of students who will be making a lot of money after they graduate, and not producing a lot of public benefit? The low UC law school tuition of yore was a giveaway to people who patently didn't need it. It makes a lot more sense to raise tuition for everybody, thus generating cash to give to public servant and non-profit alumni, who presumably will be underpaid compared to the amount of social benefit they create. Gotta internalize that externality, yo.mistergoft wrote:Does it strike anyone else as ironic that the schools (well, Berkeley at least) are increasing tuition costs so that they can expand their LRAP offerings?
- jks289
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:42 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
I'm sitting at my office in Santa Monica. It's January 4th and a sunny, breezy 73 degrees. Yesterday it was almost 80 out so we walked on the beach. Nothing wrong with that, my friend.Cavalier wrote:What isn't wrong with California.
- johnstuartmill
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:53 pm
Re: FML - Cali Schools 2013
180jks289 wrote:I'm sitting at my office in Santa Monica. It's January 4th and a sunny, breezy 73 degrees. Yesterday it was almost 80 out so we walked on the beach. Nothing wrong with that, my friend.Cavalier wrote:What isn't wrong with California.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login