Post
by Wooostl2012 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:12 pm
Had all three of these:
Crain is pretty much exactly as JCougar described, very smart, very liberal, raises sheep. She values participation a lot, but you have to make good points, she doesn't give credit for quantity. It helps if you tend to agree with her position on things, or can answer questions as if you do. Really cares, which is a plus.
Levin is unbelievably smart, esp in admin law. He's difficult to hear from beyond the first few rows, so sit up front if you can. I know a lot of people that thought he was boring, but he's pretty funny in subtle ways if you listen to him. He does do cold calling and is very socratic so it is usually a good idea to read for his class, which in admin involves a book he co-authored. Essentially the whole class revolves around problems that are written at the end of each section.
I'm not a big fan of Rosen. He's a nice enough guy, but definitely a practitioner and not shy about being very political. His test questions weren't very well written. But, nice guy.
Going to have to disagree that you learn nothing in law school. For me, who teaches has made a huge difference on how much material I've retained, and I've actually been surprised how often concepts learned in class have been relevant at my summer gig. Just an opinion.