OCI/callbacks/etc Men's Clothing Mega-thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
So, there's been discussion about wearing a red power tie to interviews. Do we mean this literally? In other words, is any conservative tie appropriate, or is a red tie with white dots literally the only viable option?
For example, is this tie acceptable?: http://www.thetiebar.com/order_page.asp ... sTiesOnly=
Or are we all to where this tie?: http://www.thetiebar.com/order_page.asp ... sTiesOnly=
Maybe some photos of ties that people in the know find acceptable. For second round interviews, one would have to where a different tie, no?
For example, is this tie acceptable?: http://www.thetiebar.com/order_page.asp ... sTiesOnly=
Or are we all to where this tie?: http://www.thetiebar.com/order_page.asp ... sTiesOnly=
Maybe some photos of ties that people in the know find acceptable. For second round interviews, one would have to where a different tie, no?
- BunkMoreland
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:16 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Bronte,
I have had success in interviews wearing the blue with dots tie as well.
I have had success in interviews wearing the blue with dots tie as well.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Do want. Love Florsheims. Nice purchase, Bosque.Bosque wrote:I picked up a pair of these at the begining of the summer on sale. I love them:
--ImageRemoved--
- TCScrutinizer
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:01 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Whatever. I could run a marathon in them, if I could run a marathon at all. They make them extra wide for my fat trailer trash feet.BunkMoreland wrote:TCScrutinizer wrote:romothesavior wrote:Finding a reasonably-priced leather soled shoe is proving difficult.
Just go to JC Penney and buy a pair of Rockports. They are by far the most comfortable dress shoes I've worn in any price range.
eww.....
- James Bond
- Posts: 2344
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
GTFO, hipsterWaterman47 wrote: wear them ironically.
Go back to your wolf t-shirts
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Bosque
- Posts: 1672
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:14 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Only critique I have of the shoe: the "shock absorber" in the heel wears down quick. I have only been wearing them for about three months (although I have been doing it every day, and I have had to walk on some rather gravely sidewalks for 15 or so blocks twice a day at minimum), and I already need to get them patched up.seespotrun wrote:Do want. Love Florsheims. Nice purchase, Bosque.Bosque wrote:I picked up a pair of these at the begining of the summer on sale. I love them:
--ImageRemoved--
But other than that, best shoe I have ever had. If you get a pair, you might want to go a 1/2 size lower than you usually do.
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Regarding the leather vs. rubber sole discussion, I bought a pair of Bostonian Akron cap-toes today at Macy's, as we were discussing above. I believe they do in fact have leather soles.
The Bostonian's sole looks like this:

And I checked out a pair of Allen Edmonds Park Avenues at Nordstrom, which look like this (except new):

Both seem, to the layman's eye at least, to have a leather sole with a rubber layer on the heal. Either way, it seems like the Bostonian Akron cap-toe is a pretty good deal for a starving law student, especially now that the Park Avenues are back up to $325.
Got them for $75:

Feel free to object as I can still return them.
The Bostonian's sole looks like this:

And I checked out a pair of Allen Edmonds Park Avenues at Nordstrom, which look like this (except new):

Both seem, to the layman's eye at least, to have a leather sole with a rubber layer on the heal. Either way, it seems like the Bostonian Akron cap-toe is a pretty good deal for a starving law student, especially now that the Park Avenues are back up to $325.
Got them for $75:

Feel free to object as I can still return them.
- TCScrutinizer
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:01 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Somewhere Veblen is laughing his ass off.
- Waterman47
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
No objections. Great find.Bronte wrote:Regarding the leather vs. rubber sole discussion, I bought a pair of Bostonian Akron cap-toes today at Macy's, as we were discussing above. I believe they do in fact have leather soles.
The Bostonian's sole looks like this:
And I checked out a pair of Allen Edmonds Park Avenues at Nordstrom, which look like this (except new):
Both seem, to the layman's eye at least, to have a leather sole with a rubber layer on the heal. Either way, it seems like the Bostonian Akron cap-toe is a pretty good deal for a starving law student, especially now that the Park Avenues are back up to $325.
Got them for $75:
Feel free to object as I can still return them.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Bronte, I had the same pair of shoes in my hand last night at Macy's and almost bought them. I probably will go back and get them sometime. Good find, IMO.
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Waterman, others, thanks for your help. Romo if you do go back and get them, make sure to ask for the $74.99 online price. They were listed in-store at $89.99.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Yea, I've bought that exact same pair 3 times over (in cordovan and black). The price always fluctuates between $75-90. If you get a free shipping deal, it makes sense to do it online; but if not, the shipping cost makes the difference negligible.Bronte wrote:Waterman, others, thanks for your help. Romo if you do go back and get them, make sure to ask for the $74.99 online price. They were listed in-store at $89.99.
Anyway, they are a great pair of shoes for the money. Until I'm gainfully employed, making it rain and such, I'm not gonna drop $300+ on a pair of shoes.
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
What color shoes with a Navy suit? Dark Brown? Can I wear black shoes with a navy suit? A quick google suggests that is the norm...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
IB everyone tells you black.blowhard wrote:What color shoes with a Navy suit? Dark Brown?
Black is acceptable, but cordovan is TCR.
- Duralex
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:25 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Dark brown or black. If brown, they shouldn't be noticeably lighter than your suit's shade of navy. (And belt must match shoes, of course.)
Cordovan or oxblood is probably flashier than most people here are looking for, especially in the inexpensive range where you don't really want to attract close attention to your shoes.
Cordovan or oxblood is probably flashier than most people here are looking for, especially in the inexpensive range where you don't really want to attract close attention to your shoes.
Last edited by Duralex on Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
IMO, this is why I usually go with black. Black is black. Finding a belt to match the shade of dark brown isn't difficult, but it looks stupid when its messed up.Duralex wrote:Dark brown or black. If brown, they shouldn't be noticeably lighter than your suit's shade of navy. (And belt must match shoes, of course.)
But yeah, cordovan belt/shoe combo is very win.
Last edited by romothesavior on Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
- zettsscores40
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Black for an interview, dark brown with everything else. Both look good IMO. As long as they're dark as your suit you should be good to go. Brown looks better IMO.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Why is cordovan TCR? According to the results on google, cordovan is acceptable but black is more formal.seespotrun wrote:IB everyone tells you black.blowhard wrote:What color shoes with a Navy suit? Dark Brown?
Black is acceptable, but cordovan is TCR.
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Also, any suggestion on picking a good tailor for suits? I need to get my pants hemmed and maybe my jacket adjusted a little.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I really can't wrap my head around this anti-cordovan trolling that ensues in all of these threads on TLS.betasteve wrote:This is TCR.zettsscores40 wrote:Black for an interview, dark brown with everything else. Both look good IMO. As long as they're dark as your suit you should be good to go. Brown looks better IMO.
Why black for an interview? Cordovan is every bit as professional-looking as black.
- Duralex
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:25 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
I think it's a matter of taste at that point--cordovan can look very refined where black just looks standard-issue. Black shoes are "more formal" in theory and I'll defer to others on this but I don't think even interviewing reaches quite that height of formality/reserve: it's not a black tie dinner or a funeral. However, inexpensive cordovan shoes can be hard to find, you need a matching belt, and if you're only going to buy one pair they're going to be black.
On the tailor: I can't give tips on how to pre-select, except word of mouth (which is how the people I know found the ones they use--maybe Yelp?) but I can emphasize that you should go through a trial period. Get a pair of trousers finished. Then get a decent but not super expensive sport coat or similar altered. Then try the tailor on a suit. (You may not have time for this kind of courtship, but I'm afraid of getting suits I'm planning on holding onto for a while altered by someone unproven.)
On the tailor: I can't give tips on how to pre-select, except word of mouth (which is how the people I know found the ones they use--maybe Yelp?) but I can emphasize that you should go through a trial period. Get a pair of trousers finished. Then get a decent but not super expensive sport coat or similar altered. Then try the tailor on a suit. (You may not have time for this kind of courtship, but I'm afraid of getting suits I'm planning on holding onto for a while altered by someone unproven.)
Last edited by Duralex on Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- zettsscores40
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Go to Ojen's on State Street. My aunt and uncle own a boutique and offer to tailor everything for free for me but I'd rather pay money for Ojen to do it. She's amazing. She's pricey but you won't be disappointed.blowhard wrote:Also, any suggestion on picking a good tailor for suits? I need to get my pants hemmed and maybe my jacket adjusted a little.
- zettsscores40
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Because black is more formal. Err on the side of caution during interviews IMO and once your foot is in the door rock dark brown all you want IMO. It's just a safer pick. It can't help you. People out there still believe brown+navy is like committing murder. Why risk it? Just throw on black for the day.seespotrun wrote:I really can't wrap my head around this anti-cordovan trolling that ensues in all of these threads on TLS.betasteve wrote:This is TCR.zettsscores40 wrote:Black for an interview, dark brown with everything else. Both look good IMO. As long as they're dark as your suit you should be good to go. Brown looks better IMO.
Why black for an interview? Cordovan is every bit as professional-looking as black.
- seespotrun
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:36 am
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
Brown + navy is committing murder? Traditionally, blue+black was frowned upon. At least that's what I had been told.zettsscores40 wrote:Because black is more formal. Err on the side of caution during interviews IMO and once your foot is in the door rock dark brown all you want IMO. It's just a safer pick. It can't help you. People out there still believe brown+navy is like committing murder. Why risk it? Just throw on black for the day.seespotrun wrote:I really can't wrap my head around this anti-cordovan trolling that ensues in all of these threads on TLS.betasteve wrote:This is TCR.zettsscores40 wrote:Black for an interview, dark brown with everything else. Both look good IMO. As long as they're dark as your suit you should be good to go. Brown looks better IMO.
Why black for an interview? Cordovan is every bit as professional-looking as black.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Suits (Clothing, not law)
+1. Nothing wrong with navy and dark brown.seespotrun wrote: Brown + navy is committing murder? Traditionally, blue+black was frowned upon. At least that's what I had been told.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login