Pay for Chambers-ranked plaintiff securities class-action firms Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 430417
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Pay for Chambers-ranked plaintiff securities class-action firms

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 16, 2024 11:47 pm

Anyone know what these firms (the ones that do plaintiff securities litigation in particular) pay mid-levels and seniors for base? Bonuses in a good year, bad year, typical year?

I was told from a recruiter that base would be around $250-$300k and that bonuses could be $500k+ in a "good year". The base salary seems about typical for these - aside from the most prestigious - based on searching TLS. But the $500k+ bonus for simply a "good year" and not a truly exceptional year seems too good to be true...

(Posting anon because the information and numbers provided could out me).

Anonymous User
Posts: 430417
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Pay for Chambers-ranked plaintiff securities class-action firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:31 am

With the caveat that the below is only from hearsay from talking to people from these firms when considering them as a post-clerkship option.

My understanding is anywhere approaching a 500K bonus for a mid or senior associate is reserved for years where all of the following are true: (1) the firm had an extraordinary year with a gigantic win or multiple big wins, (2) the associate getting the bonus was integrally involved on those wins, (3) the associate is on their way to making partner, is working super hard and is recognized by the firm as brilliant.

The Lsat Airbender

Gold
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:34 pm

Re: Pay for Chambers-ranked plaintiff securities class-action firms

Post by The Lsat Airbender » Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:28 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 16, 2024 11:47 pm
I was told from a recruiter that base would be around $250-$300k and that bonuses could be $500k+ in a "good year". The base salary seems about typical for these - aside from the most prestigious - based on searching TLS. But the $500k+ bonus for simply a "good year" and not a truly exceptional year seems too good to be true...
bolded is how you know you're not taking the appropriate grain of salt. When someone is pitching a role and says something might happen "in a good year" they likely mean "the absolute high end of what is possible"

Geddylee

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:18 pm

Re: Pay for Chambers-ranked plaintiff securities class-action firms

Post by Geddylee » Sun Aug 25, 2024 9:49 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Aug 16, 2024 11:47 pm
Anyone know what these firms (the ones that do plaintiff securities litigation in particular) pay mid-levels and seniors for base? Bonuses in a good year, bad year, typical year?

I was told from a recruiter that base would be around $250-$300k and that bonuses could be $500k+ in a "good year". The base salary seems about typical for these - aside from the most prestigious - based on searching TLS. But the $500k+ bonus for simply a "good year" and not a truly exceptional year seems too good to be true...

(Posting anon because the information and numbers provided could out me).
Practically speaking, why bother. Securities class actions is a field where a guy loses $1000 and is paid $3.
Most of the disgruntled Plaintiffs get a check in the mail for 75 cents and don't cash it.
Lerach was a pioneer in this field back in the 1990s.
He would shake down Silicon Valley CEOs and threaten them with losing their homes if they didn't settle.
Lerach ended up in prison and the field has been a laughing stock ever since.

jdkale

New
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:33 am

Re: Pay for Chambers-ranked plaintiff securities class-action firms

Post by jdkale » Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:24 pm

I might bother for the $102 million stock lending settlement that QE and Cohen Milstein did (reported an hour ago). Then again, maybe not. I wouldn't want to be a laughing stock.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”