Overemployment Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Overemployment
I know a friend in tech who is overemployed (working six jobs) pulling $550K cash. He spends about 30 hours a week across three jobs and completely blows off the other three. Has anyone in biglaw tried pulling this off? I think the biglaw schedule is inhibitive for this but curious nonetheless.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Overemployment
I’ve thought about it, but it’s tough when you’re on the website.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:08 pm
Re: Overemployment
Are you actually considering this or trolling?
Hours aside, you’d get suspended or disbarred because of conflicts issues and fired and blackballed.
Hours aside, you’d get suspended or disbarred because of conflicts issues and fired and blackballed.
-
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:56 am
Re: Overemployment
Please try and let us know how it goes.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Overemployment
What's the case if you run a conflicts check to monitor whether second employer is a client or adversary?ChickenSalad wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 9:01 pmAre you actually considering this or trolling?
Hours aside, you’d get suspended or disbarred because of conflicts issues and fired and blackballed.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Overemployment
Then what do you do when they become one of those?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 3:23 pmWhat's the case if you run a conflicts check to monitor whether second employer is a client or adversary?ChickenSalad wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 9:01 pmAre you actually considering this or trolling?
Hours aside, you’d get suspended or disbarred because of conflicts issues and fired and blackballed.
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:34 am
Re: Overemployment
OP, you sound like the gullible type that would buy sand in the desert if you actually believe that story. 6 jobs for $550k? Come on man.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Overemployment
This is sour grapes-type thinking.malibustacy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:42 pmOP, you sound like the gullible type that would buy sand in the desert if you actually believe that story. 6 jobs for $550k? Come on man.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Overemployment
Sure you could pull it off. Lawyer by day, uber driver by night.
-
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:49 pm
Re: Overemployment
?? It's a real thing. WSJ ran a story on it over a year ago; I'm sure others have covered it too. Some people - particularly in tech - get good enough at what they do that they can do a mediocre job remotely at multiple companies at once. And some people have been just cycling through, figuring what they hell, if they get fired for poor performance they'll just take on another (given the tech labor economy during the pandemic, until recently this wasn't a weird thing to think).malibustacy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:42 pmOP, you sound like the gullible type that would buy sand in the desert if you actually believe that story. 6 jobs for $550k? Come on man.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:08 pm
Re: Overemployment
The risk isn’t really that the employer is a client or adversary, it’s whether every single client that you work for at Firm B is adverse to clients at Firm A.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 3:23 pmWhat's the case if you run a conflicts check to monitor whether second employer is a client or adversary?ChickenSalad wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 9:01 pmAre you actually considering this or trolling?
Hours aside, you’d get suspended or disbarred because of conflicts issues and fired and blackballed.
Since it’s biglaw, the odds are also very high that Firm A and Firm B represent opposing parties in ongoing litigation at any given time.
That’s a speedrun to getting disbarred, even if you aren’t actively working on any of these conflicted cases (since conflicts are imputed).
This just has to be a troll.
-
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Overemployment
I've definitely heard of this, but 6 jobs seems a little much. Though I also have no idea what any of the jobs entail.Wanderingdrock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:26 pm?? It's a real thing. WSJ ran a story on it over a year ago; I'm sure others have covered it too. Some people - particularly in tech - get good enough at what they do that they can do a mediocre job remotely at multiple companies at once. And some people have been just cycling through, figuring what they hell, if they get fired for poor performance they'll just take on another (given the tech labor economy during the pandemic, until recently this wasn't a weird thing to think).malibustacy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:42 pmOP, you sound like the gullible type that would buy sand in the desert if you actually believe that story. 6 jobs for $550k? Come on man.
Regardless, good luck trying that with biglaw.
- Bosque
- Posts: 1672
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:14 pm
Re: Overemployment
I look forward to outing the Anonymous OP when I read about their bar disciplinary action in Bloomberg.
Seriously, in the unlikely event you are not a troll, this is 100% going to get you in serious trouble and possibly even disbarred (assuming you don't disclose to your employer, which the question seems to imply). This isn't just a "gray area" like it might be for a programmer, we have very specific and hardass conflict of interest rules in this profession for a reason. No law firm will be ok with this.
If you really want to work for six different bosses at once, we already have a structure for that in law. Just open your own law office and bill them, like everyone else.
Seriously, in the unlikely event you are not a troll, this is 100% going to get you in serious trouble and possibly even disbarred (assuming you don't disclose to your employer, which the question seems to imply). This isn't just a "gray area" like it might be for a programmer, we have very specific and hardass conflict of interest rules in this profession for a reason. No law firm will be ok with this.
If you really want to work for six different bosses at once, we already have a structure for that in law. Just open your own law office and bill them, like everyone else.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:44 pm
Re: Overemployment
Maybe you can do biglaw and then take on one (or two) of those short term doc review projects where they pay you hourly on the side...? Assuming again no conflict issues of course and you can manage the fact that being in big law is basically being on call even if you dont have a lot of billables in a current stretch.
-
- Posts: 432631
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Overemployment
Why do you think this thread is talking about working at two firms?ChickenSalad wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 7:58 pmThe risk isn’t really that the employer is a client or adversary, it’s whether every single client that you work for at Firm B is adverse to clients at Firm A.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 3:23 pmWhat's the case if you run a conflicts check to monitor whether second employer is a client or adversary?ChickenSalad wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 9:01 pmAre you actually considering this or trolling?
Hours aside, you’d get suspended or disbarred because of conflicts issues and fired and blackballed.
Since it’s biglaw, the odds are also very high that Firm A and Firm B represent opposing parties in ongoing litigation at any given time.
That’s a speedrun to getting disbarred, even if you aren’t actively working on any of these conflicted cases (since conflicts are imputed).
This just has to be a troll.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Overemployment
Heard a story someone actually did pick up an in-house job in addition to their firm job for about 10 months in 2020/2021 and apparently had no issues other than explaining to new job that they had no idea why they were still on the firm website, other than of course it being an absurd amount of work overall (which is why I’m guessing it didn’t last).
Think you’d have a much harder time finding two fully remote jobs to pull it off now.
Think you’d have a much harder time finding two fully remote jobs to pull it off now.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Overemployment
There is also a well-known story about some kid in the 90s who accepted two NYC summer offers and presumably just kind of ran back and forth between the two; took him a couple weeks to get discovered and fired from both.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:08 pm
Re: Overemployment
This is the part I don’t get. What’s the best case outcome here (or for OP)? That this plan works a few weeks/months until the firms find out, fire you and report you for discipline to the bar/your law school?Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote: ↑Sat Dec 10, 2022 4:42 pmThere is also a well-known story about some kid in the 90s who accepted two NYC summer offers and presumably just kind of ran back and forth between the two; *took him a couple weeks to get discovered and fired from both.*
At some point the music stops and the price isn’t worth the time you spent in law school (or the debt, expulsion/disbarment)
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:29 pm
Re: Overemployment
With the flat bonuses, time to pull out the side gigs!
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 9:58 am
Re: Overemployment
This ... actually seems doable during COVID. Summers don't do much anyway, and without social events, it would not be that hard to stay on top of emails. Just keep both computers open and it could actually work.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote: ↑Sat Dec 10, 2022 4:42 pmThere is also a well-known story about some kid in the 90s who accepted two NYC summer offers and presumably just kind of ran back and forth between the two; took him a couple weeks to get discovered and fired from both.
Getting multiple jobs would be hard at a firm (since so many things are time-sensitive), but might be possible if you had a government job or a mediocre role at a big company's legal department. It would still be a terrible idea because of the ethical issues--the costs of being caught are much higher for attorneys than for programmers.
-
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:49 pm
Re: Overemployment
Oh for sure, never do this in the law. It only works if you don't tell your employers, and lying about something like that - even just by omission - is disqualifying as far as character and fitness goes, at the very least. In Biglaw, it probably wouldn't even work from a pure doing-your-job perspective. I meant to be clearer that this is really only something that works and could arguably be considered by some to be ethical in tech.nixy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:15 pmI've definitely heard of this, but 6 jobs seems a little much. Though I also have no idea what any of the jobs entail.Wanderingdrock wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:26 pm?? It's a real thing. WSJ ran a story on it over a year ago; I'm sure others have covered it too. Some people - particularly in tech - get good enough at what they do that they can do a mediocre job remotely at multiple companies at once. And some people have been just cycling through, figuring what they hell, if they get fired for poor performance they'll just take on another (given the tech labor economy during the pandemic, until recently this wasn't a weird thing to think).malibustacy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:42 pmOP, you sound like the gullible type that would buy sand in the desert if you actually believe that story. 6 jobs for $550k? Come on man.
Regardless, good luck trying that with biglaw.
-
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:43 pm
Re: Overemployment
There are probably a few other industries that this could work in. I had a friend who worked in sales job and usually had just a few big client calls a day. He spent the rest of the day as a Wag dog walker.
But, yea, this obviously doesn't work for firms. And, Even if it were ethical to do multiple in house jobs, I don't think it would practically work at all.
But, yea, this obviously doesn't work for firms. And, Even if it were ethical to do multiple in house jobs, I don't think it would practically work at all.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login