Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Title says it all. From what I know, Susman has the shortest; clocking in at six years til eligible for partnership (could be as short as four if you clerk for the Supreme Court). Anyone know of any firms with lesser than or equal to tracks?
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Honigman is also 6 years
- nealric
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Worth noting that a lot of the boutiques with short partnership tracks start counting post-clerkship. Since most successful candidates have at least a year or two of clerkship experience, the track isn't necessarily that much shorter from the time of graduation.
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Bartlit Beck has promoted some (post-clerkships) in 3 years.
- trebekismyhero
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Kirkland, Honigman, and I have heard McDermott (someone else can confirm) do non-equity partners after 6 years. I am sure there are others that do that for non-equity, doubt there are any major firms that do equity partnership in less than 8 years.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Cravath is equity-only and makes partners after 7 years. (My firm also has a 7 year partnership track but that is for non-equity status.)
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Doesn't Knobbe have a 6 year partner track as well? They sold that hard on me during interviewing a few years ago and said everything short of "everyone makes it if they want to."
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:14 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
This is dependent on the group. For corporate, you make partner at 7 years (well, plus stub). Tax, Compensation, and T&E people often take 8-10 years. No clue about litigators.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Nov 09, 2022 7:13 pmCravath is equity-only and makes partners after 7 years. (My firm also has a 7 year partnership track but that is for non-equity status.)
McDermott does its nonequity after 7 years I believe (not 6). I believe Skadden now does counsel after 6 years.
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Bartlit Beck is 4.5, which I believe is the shortest of any major firm or boutique
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
McDermott just prompted class of 2016 to income partner, so its 6th years going on 7th years. Capital partners are usually at least 3 years at the income partner level before eligibility, so about 10 years totalSackboy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 09, 2022 7:38 pmThis is dependent on the group. For corporate, you make partner at 7 years (well, plus stub). Tax, Compensation, and T&E people often take 8-10 years. No clue about litigators.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Nov 09, 2022 7:13 pmCravath is equity-only and makes partners after 7 years. (My firm also has a 7 year partnership track but that is for non-equity status.)
McDermott does its nonequity after 7 years I believe (not 6). I believe Skadden now does counsel after 6 years.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Confirmed MWE still does NEP after 6.trebekismyhero wrote: ↑Wed Nov 09, 2022 6:30 pmKirkland, Honigman, and I have heard McDermott (someone else can confirm) do non-equity partners after 6 years. I am sure there are others that do that for non-equity, doubt there are any major firms that do equity partnership in less than 8 years.
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
What happens if you don't make it by year 4.5? I see a bunch of 2017 grads who have presumably heard about their election (or non-election) and few beyond (2014, 2016 grads).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:04 pmBartlit Beck is 4.5, which I believe is the shortest of any major firm or boutique
-
- Posts: 432637
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Firms with Shortest Partnership Tracks?
Idk, most partners make it at 4.5 but some do later. It’s a very black box firm, you can’t even find their base salary anywhere online (I know it’s well above market but nothing specific).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:04 amWhat happens if you don't make it by year 4.5? I see a bunch of 2017 grads who have presumably heard about their election (or non-election) and few beyond (2014, 2016 grads).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Nov 09, 2022 10:04 pmBartlit Beck is 4.5, which I believe is the shortest of any major firm or boutique
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login