NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
Interested in doing corporate work but no specific interest. I really liked the people I talked to at Sidley during the interview, but words on the street seem to suggest that Cleary is a better firm for corporate work, at least in NY?
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sun Aug 14, 2022 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
Historically Cleary was a much more prestigious firm in NYC. Today they are peer firms in NYC (unless you are a TLS poster who repeatedly types the phrase “white shoe”), so if you liked Sidley better it wouldn’t be any impediment to your career to go there.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2021 1:22 pm
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
Idk how Sidley does it, but Cleary has a corporate pool for the first year so you can try out different practice groups before picking a group at the end of your first year. I really appreciate that flexibility.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
If both NY, it's Cleary >> Sidley.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 3:06 amInterested in doing corporate work but no specific interest. I really the people I talked to at Sidley during the interview, but words on the street seem to suggest that Cleary is a better firm for corporate work, at least in NY?
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
There is some truth to this but I think it’s easily Cleary.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 11:07 amHistorically Cleary was a much more prestigious firm in NYC. Today they are peer firms in NYC (unless you are a TLS poster who repeatedly types the phrase “white shoe”), so if you liked Sidley better it wouldn’t be any impediment to your career to go there.
They’re still clearly better at most of the main corporate practice areas.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:55 pm
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
I would go with Cleary purely to avoid the possibility of getting staffed onto securitizations at Sidley
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
My understanding is that Sidley NY has been hemorrhaging associates recently, particularly in their capital markets practice. I was honestly shocked at the number of associates that lateraled to my firm within a short period of time and in that same time frame the full deal team across from me had left the firm. After asking one of the laterals for the reason, there wasn’t a clear indication as to why people were jumping ship but they confirmed a lot of associates had left.
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
Right, I think Cleary still is the stronger firm in NYC. Although I don’t think taking Sidley would be crazy, whereas in the past it would have beenexistentialcrisis wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 8:55 amThere is some truth to this but I think it’s easily Cleary.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 11:07 amHistorically Cleary was a much more prestigious firm in NYC. Today they are peer firms in NYC (unless you are a TLS poster who repeatedly types the phrase “white shoe”), so if you liked Sidley better it wouldn’t be any impediment to your career to go there.
They’re still clearly better at most of the main corporate practice areas.
-
- Posts: 432635
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
Sidley band 2 highly regarded corporate vs Cleary band 3 the elite. In the grand v100 scheme of things, they might be "peers," but Cleary's corporate is still stronger than Sidley. People often confuse Sidley NY with Sidley Chi's powerhouse.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 11:52 amRight, I think Cleary still is the stronger firm in NYC. Although I don’t think taking Sidley would be crazy, whereas in the past it would have beenexistentialcrisis wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 8:55 amThere is some truth to this but I think it’s easily Cleary.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 11:07 amHistorically Cleary was a much more prestigious firm in NYC. Today they are peer firms in NYC (unless you are a TLS poster who repeatedly types the phrase “white shoe”), so if you liked Sidley better it wouldn’t be any impediment to your career to go there.
They’re still clearly better at most of the main corporate practice areas.
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: NY Transactional - Sidley v Cleary
Yea I don’t read Chambers so not sure what that means. I’m basing my views on my experience as an associate. Just don’t see Cleary on many deals anymore.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 12:22 pmSidley band 2 highly regarded corporate vs Cleary band 3 the elite. In the grand v100 scheme of things, they might be "peers," but Cleary's corporate is still stronger than Sidley. People often confuse Sidley NY with Sidley Chi's powerhouse.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 11:52 amRight, I think Cleary still is the stronger firm in NYC. Although I don’t think taking Sidley would be crazy, whereas in the past it would have beenexistentialcrisis wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 8:55 amThere is some truth to this but I think it’s easily Cleary.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 11:07 amHistorically Cleary was a much more prestigious firm in NYC. Today they are peer firms in NYC (unless you are a TLS poster who repeatedly types the phrase “white shoe”), so if you liked Sidley better it wouldn’t be any impediment to your career to go there.
They’re still clearly better at most of the main corporate practice areas.