Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Hi, please help me decide which firm woupd be my best choice.
All in NY. Interested in transactional. Practice area I am interested is undecided (but m&a, capital markets, investment management seem appealing).
Willkie is headquarterd in NY, whereas sidley and ropes are not. Both are great firms in chicago and boston, but not sure how their ny satelite offices are like. Which would you pick?
All in NY. Interested in transactional. Practice area I am interested is undecided (but m&a, capital markets, investment management seem appealing).
Willkie is headquarterd in NY, whereas sidley and ropes are not. Both are great firms in chicago and boston, but not sure how their ny satelite offices are like. Which would you pick?
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Wonder who’s voting and why Willkie takes the cake here. I thought most TLSers follow vault, in which case Sidley would win.
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:14 am
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
They're pretty much identical firms in terms of PPP/RPL; however, Sidley is a Chicago HQ'd firm, and Willkie is NY HQ'd firm. For NYers and people into NY biglaw, that means something. They're somewhat xenophobic in a sense. Any other market might as well be a foreign country. It's the same reason why they reject Kirkland so hard despite it trouncing many of NYers most frothed over firms in PPP/RPL. It's also the same reason why Fried Frank, Shearman, Schulte, and Cahill all get more airtime than they would if people just followed Vault. To some degree, being at the HQ of a firm is important, but when you're talking about firms that have sizable offices in your city that aren't merely "satellite" offices with 20 people you've moved past that point.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:00 pmWonder who’s voting and why Willkie takes the cake here. I thought most TLSers follow vault, in which case Sidley would win.
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Agreed, I don't think the NY office of any V20 can fairly be called a "satellite" -- but law students seem to think non-HQ = automatically a satellite. Are people turning down offers at Latham and Gibson for this reason, too?Sackboy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:24 pmThey're pretty much identical firms in terms of PPP/RPL; however, Sidley is a Chicago HQ'd firm, and Willkie is NY HQ'd firm. For NYers and people into NY biglaw, that means something. They're somewhat xenophobic in a sense. Any other market might as well be a foreign country. It's the same reason why they reject Kirkland so hard despite it trouncing many of NYers most frothed over firms in PPP/RPL. It's also the same reason why Fried Frank, Shearman, Schulte, and Cahill all get more airtime than they would if people just followed Vault. To some degree, being at the HQ of a firm is important, but when you're talking about firms that have sizable offices in your city that aren't merely "satellite" offices with 20 people you've moved past that point.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:00 pmWonder who’s voting and why Willkie takes the cake here. I thought most TLSers follow vault, in which case Sidley would win.
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Weird Willkie hate.
Aside from just being a “Hq” they’re also very good at all the basic corporate stuff in NY, easily better than Sidley at most of it.
Ropes could definitely be a better choice depending on what your specific interests are, especially if you wanna do PE stuff.
Aside from just being a “Hq” they’re also very good at all the basic corporate stuff in NY, easily better than Sidley at most of it.
Ropes could definitely be a better choice depending on what your specific interests are, especially if you wanna do PE stuff.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
I voted Wilkie and I'm actually in Chicago. These are all excellent firms and it's silly to focus so much on vault rankings. Marginal advantage due to being the HQ.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
hmm idk about gibson but no way latham ny would be considered satellite office haha. almost 700 attorneys in ny, largest office of the firm (second largest being london office, LA office has less than 300 lawyers), and more than half of executive committee are in new york - it's a global firm but ny definitely feels more like the centerRes Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:28 pmAgreed, I don't think the NY office of any V20 can fairly be called a "satellite" -- but law students seem to think non-HQ = automatically a satellite. Are people turning down offers at Latham and Gibson for this reason, too?Sackboy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:24 pmThey're pretty much identical firms in terms of PPP/RPL; however, Sidley is a Chicago HQ'd firm, and Willkie is NY HQ'd firm. For NYers and people into NY biglaw, that means something. They're somewhat xenophobic in a sense. Any other market might as well be a foreign country. It's the same reason why they reject Kirkland so hard despite it trouncing many of NYers most frothed over firms in PPP/RPL. It's also the same reason why Fried Frank, Shearman, Schulte, and Cahill all get more airtime than they would if people just followed Vault. To some degree, being at the HQ of a firm is important, but when you're talking about firms that have sizable offices in your city that aren't merely "satellite" offices with 20 people you've moved past that point.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:00 pmWonder who’s voting and why Willkie takes the cake here. I thought most TLSers follow vault, in which case Sidley would win.
- Wild Card
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Sidley is more selective than Ropes and Willkie. Like, 3.3 v. 3.2 v. 3.1. So, at the very least, it helps you signal that you're a medianish kinda guy.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:00 pmWonder who’s voting and why Willkie takes the cake here. I thought most TLSers follow vault, in which case Sidley would win.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Willkie makes first years sit in a bullpen which is a huge negative IMO.
- existentialcrisis
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:23 pm
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
That's actually a deal breaker IMO.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 9:48 amWillkie makes first years sit in a bullpen which is a huge negative IMO.
I change my vote to Ropes here.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Ropes' New York office is larger than the Boston office and has been for a few years now, so wouldn't call it a satellite. Depends on your specific transactional interest. They're very strong in private equity, as others mentioned.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Chambere band rankings: Willkie >>> Sidley.
/thread
/thread
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:55 pm
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
I would go with Ropes if you want to do M&A and don't care about culture, but real answer would be to hear from some 2-3rd year corporate associates from each one to see to what degree they are hating it. None of these are satellite offices though, so don't factor that in.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Ropes also has some juniors in bullpens, so take Sidley if they’re the only firm not doing that.
Locally in NYC, they’re all good options and respected names. Nationally I’d say Sidley is a bit more prestigious than Ropes, which in turn is a much bigger name than Willkie.
Locally in NYC, they’re all good options and respected names. Nationally I’d say Sidley is a bit more prestigious than Ropes, which in turn is a much bigger name than Willkie.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Willkie vs sidley vs ropes &gray
Sidley NY has bullpens too.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:27 amRopes also has some juniors in bullpens, so take Sidley if they’re the only firm not doing that.
Locally in NYC, they’re all good options and respected names. Nationally I’d say Sidley is a bit more prestigious than Ropes, which in turn is a much bigger name than Willkie.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login