S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Which should I choose for 2L SA?
Litigation/white collar
Have offers from first two, callbacks at the rest.
Litigation/white collar
Have offers from first two, callbacks at the rest.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Anyone of S&C DPW, PW - legit no differences in exits/prestige, just go w fit.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Any of these is fine. Are you required to decide before OCI? Or can you check out other alternatives as well?
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
They’re all about the same.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Go to S&C if you want to be miserable around miserable people
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
I would choose based on location. DPW and PW are in midtown, and S&C is in FiDi. So if you’re into living in Brooklyn or like FiDi, then S&C is convenient. But if you wanted to live uptown, S&C would be a pain in the ass.
I don’t think Cleary or Deb should really be in this conversation. Deb is good at white collar but there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to get that work. It’s like going to Proskauer for sports law.
I don’t think Cleary or Deb should really be in this conversation. Deb is good at white collar but there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to get that work. It’s like going to Proskauer for sports law.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Is Deb that much better than PW or DPW at White Collar?
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Personally, I have the opposite take. They're all band 1, so why choose working at the insufferable S&C if you can avoid it? Although I would rule out Deb if they're not guaranteeing you a spot on the WC team.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:41 amI would choose based on location. DPW and PW are in midtown, and S&C is in FiDi. So if you’re into living in Brooklyn or like FiDi, then S&C is convenient. But if you wanted to live uptown, S&C would be a pain in the ass.
I don’t think Cleary or Deb should really be in this conversation. Deb is good at white collar but there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to get that work. It’s like going to Proskauer for sports law.
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Personally I haven’t seen evidence that the people at DPW or Paul Weiss are better than the people at S&C, but YMMVAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 2:29 pmPersonally, I have the opposite take. They're all band 1, so why choose working at the insufferable S&C if you can avoid it? Although I would rule out Deb if they're not guaranteeing you a spot on the WC team.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:41 amI would choose based on location. DPW and PW are in midtown, and S&C is in FiDi. So if you’re into living in Brooklyn or like FiDi, then S&C is convenient. But if you wanted to live uptown, S&C would be a pain in the ass.
I don’t think Cleary or Deb should really be in this conversation. Deb is good at white collar but there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to get that work. It’s like going to Proskauer for sports law.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
I did reference the band 1 rankings, but fuck I guess the TLS wisdom has spoken.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 2:41 pmPersonally I haven’t seen evidence that the people at DPW or Paul Weiss are better than the people at S&C, but YMMVAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 2:29 pmPersonally, I have the opposite take. They're all band 1, so why choose working at the insufferable S&C if you can avoid it? Although I would rule out Deb if they're not guaranteeing you a spot on the WC team.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:41 amI would choose based on location. DPW and PW are in midtown, and S&C is in FiDi. So if you’re into living in Brooklyn or like FiDi, then S&C is convenient. But if you wanted to live uptown, S&C would be a pain in the ass.
I don’t think Cleary or Deb should really be in this conversation. Deb is good at white collar but there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to get that work. It’s like going to Proskauer for sports law.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Can someone explain why S&C gets the miserable reputation?
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Counter-point: if you're working at S&C, you're better off living in FiDi. No way you'd want to be commuting from Brooklyn when you're billing S&C hours.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:41 amI would choose based on location. DPW and PW are in midtown, and S&C is in FiDi. So if you’re into living in Brooklyn or like FiDi, then S&C is convenient. But if you wanted to live uptown, S&C would be a pain in the ass.
I don’t think Cleary or Deb should really be in this conversation. Deb is good at white collar but there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to get that work. It’s like going to Proskauer for sports law.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Lol who at S&C hurt youAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 6:58 pmI did reference the band 1 rankings, but fuck I guess the TLS wisdom has spoken.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 2:41 pmPersonally I haven’t seen evidence that the people at DPW or Paul Weiss are better than the people at S&C, but YMMVAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 2:29 pmPersonally, I have the opposite take. They're all band 1, so why choose working at the insufferable S&C if you can avoid it? Although I would rule out Deb if they're not guaranteeing you a spot on the WC team.Res Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:41 amI would choose based on location. DPW and PW are in midtown, and S&C is in FiDi. So if you’re into living in Brooklyn or like FiDi, then S&C is convenient. But if you wanted to live uptown, S&C would be a pain in the ass.
I don’t think Cleary or Deb should really be in this conversation. Deb is good at white collar but there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to get that work. It’s like going to Proskauer for sports law.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
I work at S&C, and this miserable reputation is quite unjustified IME. Probably originated in some TLS trope that gained a life of its own, or perhaps from an era before my time.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:58 pmCan someone explain why S&C gets the miserable reputation?
If I had to characterize S&C, it would probably be a mix of apathy and competence. Vast majority of the people I’ve met here are quite nice, not super enthusiastic about the work they do or the firm, but pretty good at what they do. But then again, maybe that describes any biglaw firm…
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
Gonna go out on a limb and say that the last two years of crazy lateralling have destroyed any meaningful differences between most firms.
-
- Posts: 431117
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: S&C v. DPW v. PW v. Cleary v. Deb
It's def not as social as a Skadden or Latham (based on law school classmate anecdotes) but the vast majority of people I've met have been cordial and respectful. Def not markedly worse than the experiences my classmates are having any other big firm.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 6:57 amI work at S&C, and this miserable reputation is quite unjustified IME. Probably originated in some TLS trope that gained a life of its own, or perhaps from an era before my time.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 10:58 pmCan someone explain why S&C gets the miserable reputation?
If I had to characterize S&C, it would probably be a mix of apathy and competence. Vast majority of the people I’ve met here are quite nice, not super enthusiastic about the work they do or the firm, but pretty good at what they do. But then again, maybe that describes any biglaw firm…
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login