WFH/In-office Policy Database Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
WFH/In-office Policy Database
Update: Using this thread as a way to crowdsource the WFH/in-office policies of the amlaw 100, so we can put together a spreadsheet to compare. Please post your WFH/in-office policies here!
Has anyone put together a spreadsheet or something similar that aggregates the WFH/in-office policies of the Amlaw firms? I'm thinking something similar to the spreadsheet someone put together for salaries/bonuses. TIA!
Has anyone put together a spreadsheet or something similar that aggregates the WFH/in-office policies of the Amlaw firms? I'm thinking something similar to the spreadsheet someone put together for salaries/bonuses. TIA!
Last edited by Anonymous User on Mon Apr 18, 2022 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BrowsingTLS

- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2021 6:17 pm
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Obnoxious to request a spreadsheet which will take a bunch of someone's time and to throw in a thanks in advance.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
The question is past-tense, dude. I.e., I asked if someone has already put one together. lol, relax.BrowsingTLS wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 4:52 pmObnoxious to request a spreadsheet which will take a bunch of someone's time and to throw in a thanks in advance.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
We can definitely crowd source one! I'm happy to create one and people can add their firms/specific offices onto it.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Good idea! Before I went in-house, I was at PW and I believe the policy was mandatory 3 days per week in office. Can any PW associates confirm?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 7:54 pmWe can definitely crowd source one! I'm happy to create one and people can add their firms/specific offices onto it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
PW associate here, and yes, it's 3 days a week, and supposedly mandatory. However, I know a lot of people who don't go in at all, and and a lot of people (including myself, a second-year, so not just senior folks) shoot for 1-2 days per week, and nobody appears to notice or care.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 9:10 pmGood idea! Before I went in-house, I was at PW and I believe the policy was mandatory 3 days per week in office. Can any PW associates confirm?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 7:54 pmWe can definitely crowd source one! I'm happy to create one and people can add their firms/specific offices onto it.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Exact same story here at Freshfields.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Apr 19, 2022 1:15 pmPW associate here, and yes, it's 3 days a week, and supposedly mandatory. However, I know a lot of people who don't go in at all, and and a lot of people (including myself, a second-year, so not just senior folks) shoot for 1-2 days per week, and nobody appears to notice or care.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 9:10 pmGood idea! Before I went in-house, I was at PW and I believe the policy was mandatory 3 days per week in office. Can any PW associates confirm?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 7:54 pmWe can definitely crowd source one! I'm happy to create one and people can add their firms/specific offices onto it.
I think the spreadsheet should have a column for what the official policy is as well as one for what it is in practice. Cognizant, of course, there is no guarantee the de facto practice will hold, but think it is helpful nonetheless, if the information is available.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Apr 19, 2022 3:28 pm
Exact same story here at Freshfields.
I think the spreadsheet should have a column for what the official policy is as well as one for what it is in practice. Cognizant, of course, there is no guarantee the de facto practice will hold, but think it is helpful nonetheless, if the information is available.
Agree!
-
Trogdor

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 1:59 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Kramer Levin's policy is 3 days in-office, two days WFH. Loosely followed/enforced.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Cooley announced today that there will be no mandate for attorneys to return to the office.
-
Trogdor

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 1:59 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Wow, are you at Cooley? If so, let me know if you'd like to chat separately. I'm looking to make a move to a remote role.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 20, 2022 12:57 pmCooley announced today that there will be no mandate for attorneys to return to the office.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Forever? That's huge and I will be using this to push our firm to be more flexibleAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 20, 2022 12:57 pmCooley announced today that there will be no mandate for attorneys to return to the office.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432852
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WFH/In-office Policy Database
Memo doesn't say the word "forever" but basically, yeah. I'll qualify and say it's "indefinite" and not "perpetual," because who knows, but it certainly appears that their intention is for this to be permanent.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 20, 2022 3:18 pmForever? That's huge and I will be using this to push our firm to be more flexibleAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Apr 20, 2022 12:57 pmCooley announced today that there will be no mandate for attorneys to return to the office.
They're keeping the physical offices open for those who choose to come in. I'm pretty sure they are giving assigned desks to those who will be coming in regularly and everyone else will be hot-desking it.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login