What's the Seattle biglaw/in-house salary like? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432779
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

What's the Seattle biglaw/in-house salary like?

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Anyone have salary information on Perkins Coie and Davis Wright Tremaine? I heard they started on the previous market ($190K) but compressed immediately after the first year. Also interested in WSGR and Cooley, although the offices seem pretty small with main practices outside of general M&A/corporate.

Also heard working in-house at some of the large tech offices in Seattle (Amazon/Microsoft/Google) pays almost Seattle biglaw rates ($160K-$200K). Wondering how common this is for Seattle companies in general and whether those on the upper end of the salary scale come with the same hour demands as biglaw.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432779
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: What's the Seattle biglaw/in-house salary like?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Feb 12, 2022 10:32 pm

Also interested in this

mongeese

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2019 12:02 pm

Re: What's the Seattle biglaw/in-house salary like?

Post by mongeese » Sun Feb 13, 2022 2:58 am

In-House varies a lot. When I interviewed for Amazon 4-5 years ago, the total compensation for a counsel role (e.g., an individual contributor below director) was around 320-350k. I think it would be closer to 400k now. I know someone who was recently offered a role at director level (second attorney) at a smaller company with 400-500 employees and he was offered 360k total compensation (260k base and rest was equity).

Anonymous User
Posts: 432779
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: What's the Seattle biglaw/in-house salary like?

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Feb 13, 2022 5:31 pm

Perkins, WSGR and Cooley all pay market. DWT has never paid market from what I remember.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!



User avatar
Baron7

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:00 pm

Re: What's the Seattle biglaw/in-house salary like?

Post by Baron7 » Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:02 am

urbancowboy wrote:
Sun Feb 13, 2022 11:19 pm
Perkins Coie is $205,000. https://nalpdirectory.com/employer_prof ... hCondJSON=
There’s salary compression at the top, I believe.
https://abovethelaw.com/2021/12/perkins-bonus-2021/

I’m not sure there are many firms that pull full market in Seattle—feel free to correct me if I’m wrong. Doesn’t make much sense given the cost of living, which is just as expensive as major markets like Boston and D.C.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432779
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: What's the Seattle biglaw/in-house salary like?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Feb 15, 2022 11:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Oct 07, 2021 8:02 pm

Anyone have salary information on Perkins Coie and Davis Wright Tremaine? I heard they started on the previous market ($190K) but compressed immediately after the first year. Also interested in WSGR and Cooley, although the offices seem pretty small with main practices outside of general M&A/corporate.

Also heard working in-house at some of the large tech offices in Seattle (Amazon/Microsoft/Google) pays almost Seattle biglaw rates ($160K-$200K). Wondering how common this is for Seattle companies in general and whether those on the upper end of the salary scale come with the same hour demands as biglaw.
Few firms pay Cravath (or close to it) in Seattle (WSGR, Cooley, DLA Piper and Fenwick). Orrick is close but below Cravath, I think. They also play funny compensation games in Seattle (e.g., making laterals take huge haircuts, a hard 2,000 hours for bonus at certain firms and so on).

Seattle is expensive, its legal market is incredibly insular and the number of lawyers at most firms that pay Cravath or close to it is small. I'd avoid.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”