DLA NY Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
anonymouss12
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2021 12:12 am
DLA NY
Any details on culture of DLA NY? If anyone has summered or is currently at the firm, it'd be great to hear from you.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DLA NY
bad firm. a giant conglomerate means it's poor in quality control and varies hugely in culture.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DLA NY
Does this apply to Latham and its NY office as well?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:41 ambad firm. a giant conglomerate means it's poor in quality control and varies hugely in culture.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DLA NY
From what I heard, your experience at DLA Piper really depends upon your team.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DLA NY
In a word, no. While firms like Latham, K&E and Skadden are mega firms, they are in a completely different league compared to firms like DLA.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:29 pmDoes this apply to Latham and its NY office as well?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:41 ambad firm. a giant conglomerate means it's poor in quality control and varies hugely in culture.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DLA NY
Agreed. The fact that these are mega firms but still have similar PEP with the smaller NY-Centric firms is what makes these firms impressive to a certain extent.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 12:34 pmIn a word, no. While firms like Latham, K&E and Skadden are mega firms, they are in a completely different league compared to firms like DLA.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:29 pmDoes this apply to Latham and its NY office as well?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:41 ambad firm. a giant conglomerate means it's poor in quality control and varies hugely in culture.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DLA NY
How does Dentons compare?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:41 ambad firm. a giant conglomerate means it's poor in quality control and varies hugely in culture.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DLA NY
Dentons is even below DLA. Not well established in the US.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:03 pmHow does Dentons compare?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:41 ambad firm. a giant conglomerate means it's poor in quality control and varies hugely in culture.
