Goodwin vs Fenwick vs Cooley (all NY) for M&A Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Goodwin vs Fenwick vs Cooley (all NY) for M&A
I have offers from the M&A groups in Goodwin, Fenwick and Cooley in NY with interest doing tech/life science work. Any recommendations/ thoughts?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Goodwin vs Fenwick vs Cooley (all NY) for M&A
Fenwick's free-market system means you can take up as much or as little M&A as you'd like. The NY office has some amazing deals flowing through for clients present on your iPhone home-screen, as well as a fast-growing practice for life sciences clients. Some people don't vibe with free-market, and if you prefer central staffing, Fenwick might be a difficult place to acclimate to.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Goodwin vs Fenwick vs Cooley (all NY) for M&A
Cooley/Fenwick should be the two firms in consideration - of these, Cooley probably has a slight edge with a stronger national profile but would just go with the people you liked the best. Imagine the substantive M&A work will be similar.
