Paul Hastings (PA) v Wilson Sonsini (SF) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Paul Hastings (PA) v Wilson Sonsini (SF)
Interested in corporate law, leaning EC/VC but I don’t particularly care tbh. Any insights?
-
DiligentSage
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 2:25 am
Re: Paul Hastings (PA) v Wilson Sonsini (SF)
If you're leaning EC/VC, then this is WSGR by a landslide and it's not close. PH is not a player in EC/VC at all.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Paul Hastings (PA) v Wilson Sonsini (SF)
Even if WSGR doesn't blow away PH's EC/VC, PH's corporate group in PA is toxic as fuck.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Paul Hastings (PA) v Wilson Sonsini (SF)
+1, I have also heard this. Same with parts of their SF corp group.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:42 amEven if WSGR doesn't blow away PH's EC/VC, PH's corporate group in PA is toxic as fuck.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Paul Hastings (PA) v Wilson Sonsini (SF)
The SF corp group is basically just the PE group + 1 guy who does his own thing mostly with NY associates. And yeah, the PE group has problems. Turnover is really high, but it's better than a lot of the other PH CA corp groups (including PA) so they grab associates from those who still see it as step up as needed.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 2:00 am+1, I have also heard this. Same with parts of their SF corp group.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Aug 25, 2021 1:42 amEven if WSGR doesn't blow away PH's EC/VC, PH's corporate group in PA is toxic as fuck.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
