2L at CCN w/ solid enough grades coming up on OCI, and very interested in VC/EC work. The dream of course is to go in-house to a small company after a few years and make a chunk of change when it IPOs/sells. I’m not talking Snowflake millions - viewtopic.php?f=23&t=309283&p=10468112& ... #p10468112 blew my mind– but in a perfect world I’d come close to making up for a few years of missed biglaw salary. I’ve got no idea how possible this is...
Assuming that plan doesn’t work out, will the VC/EC practice have limited my other exit options as compared to a PE/public M&A mix at a firm with more big company work (which to my understanding is the best platform to go F500 in house)? A subsidiary question would be to what extent can you get useful experience on bigger public company deals as a VC/EC associate at a Cooley/Goodwin/WSGR? Or any general input/advice on comparing exit ops from these two practice area routes?
In practice, I think this will come down to choosing between Ropes/Debevoise/White & Case types vs. Cooley/Goodwin/WSGR/Gunderson.
Thank you! This site has been extremely useful for me in the past.
EC/VC vs. PE & Public M&A Exit Ops & Risk? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
DumbQuestions
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2021 10:43 am
-
persia1921
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:14 pm
Re: EC/VC vs. PE & Public M&A Exit Ops & Risk?
You probably already know this from the name, but a snowflake job is just that, a snowflake, so I would not make the decision based on that. I do think a firm like Cooley/Gunderson would give you a better shot at going in house at a EGC, but that is simply because you will have more direct relationships working with EGCs at these firms. Your shots at landing a unicorn job offer probably won’t be much different between well established corporate forms—that is luck in my opinion.
In terms of mixing practices, I can’t speak for the Cooley/Gunderson firm types, but I work at one of the other firms you listed, and have a healthy split of VC work and private M&A work. Personally, I really like the split. It’s the best of both worlds and I don’t have to worry about pigeon holes…
In terms of mixing practices, I can’t speak for the Cooley/Gunderson firm types, but I work at one of the other firms you listed, and have a healthy split of VC work and private M&A work. Personally, I really like the split. It’s the best of both worlds and I don’t have to worry about pigeon holes…
-
ithrowds
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 4:19 pm
Re: EC/VC vs. PE & Public M&A Exit Ops & Risk?
Certain EC/VC firms probably set you up better for a jump to a F500 than a traditional white shoe firm, particularly a FANG type large public tech co (many of these cos are also long time clients of “EC/VC” firms). For instance, at a Cooley or a WSGR, you’d start as not necessarily a EC/VC lawyer but a general corporate associate so you’d be doing a mix of pure EC/VC, M&A, capital markets and public company representation.
