Shearman & Sterling Capital Markets? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Shearman & Sterling Capital Markets?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:21 pm

Can anyone there or who was there give me some insight into what the practice and people are like? Future exit options? Lifestyle? Types of clients/work? Thank you.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Shearman & Sterling Capital Markets?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:01 pm

Some of the partners are low-key sociopaths, and some of the associates are difficult to work with.

Lateral options of those with 3+ years or experience is good: Latham, Cooley, etc. Lateral options of those who are stealthed after 1-2 years is less good: midlaw, V100s, or V50s with undistinguished practices.

Assignment to the group, as to other groups, is random. You might not get it even if you want it.

You should consider other firms, as S&S is the only V50 that experienced significant revenue and PPP drops due to mismangement.

https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2021 ... 21-growth/

OTOH, if it's your only option, you should still take it as older attorneys still think it is a very good firm, and it has some solid practices--such as capital markets.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Shearman & Sterling Capital Markets?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:14 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:01 pm
Some of the partners are low-key sociopaths, and some of the associates are difficult to work with.

Lateral options of those with 3+ years or experience is good: Latham, Cooley, etc. Lateral options of those who are stealthed after 1-2 years is less good: midlaw, V100s, or V50s with undistinguished practices.

Assignment to the group, as to other groups, is random. You might not get it even if you want it.

You should consider other firms, as S&S is the only V50 that experienced significant revenue and PPP drops due to mismangement.

https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2021 ... 21-growth/

OTOH, if it's your only option, you should still take it as older attorneys still think it is a very good firm, and it has some solid practices--such as capital markets.
Is this specific to cap markets group or the firm generally? Also are there are lot of instances of people being stealthed?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Shearman & Sterling Capital Markets?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:34 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:14 pm
Is this specific to cap markets group or the firm generally? Also are there are lot of instances of people being stealthed?
Generally is right--in every group, there are rotten apples among partners and associates. And, generally, those with 3+ years of experience have good lateral options. Senior associates tend to go in-house, whereas midlevels tend to lateral "up." I don't think stealthing is common, but the firm is small enough that the handful of instances are very noticeable and feel like a lot.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Shearman & Sterling Capital Markets?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:56 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:01 pm
Some of the partners are low-key sociopaths, and some of the associates are difficult to work with.

Lateral options of those with 3+ years or experience is good: Latham, Cooley, etc. Lateral options of those who are stealthed after 1-2 years is less good: midlaw, V100s, or V50s with undistinguished practices.

Assignment to the group, as to other groups, is random. You might not get it even if you want it.

You should consider other firms, as S&S is the only V50 that experienced significant revenue and PPP drops due to mismangement.

https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2021 ... 21-growth/

OTOH, if it's your only option, you should still take it as older attorneys still think it is a very good firm, and it has some solid practices--such as capital markets.
Ive seen several lateral to STB/KE as well, and a few to DPW (finance). Mostly mid-levels.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Shearman & Sterling Capital Markets?

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:51 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:34 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:14 pm
Is this specific to cap markets group or the firm generally? Also are there are lot of instances of people being stealthed?
Generally is right--in every group, there are rotten apples among partners and associates. And, generally, those with 3+ years of experience have good lateral options. Senior associates tend to go in-house, whereas midlevels tend to lateral "up." I don't think stealthing is common, but the firm is small enough that the handful of instances are very noticeable and feel like a lot.
As another ex-Shearman associate, I can confirm this is pretty accurate. I lateraled to a better firm after 3 years at Shearman. Midlevels there tend to mostly lateral up or go in-house. Those that get fired or stealthed as a first or second year have very limited options.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Shearman & Sterling Capital Markets?

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Apr 27, 2021 12:13 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:51 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:34 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:14 pm
Is this specific to cap markets group or the firm generally? Also are there are lot of instances of people being stealthed?
Generally is right--in every group, there are rotten apples among partners and associates. And, generally, those with 3+ years of experience have good lateral options. Senior associates tend to go in-house, whereas midlevels tend to lateral "up." I don't think stealthing is common, but the firm is small enough that the handful of instances are very noticeable and feel like a lot.
As another ex-Shearman associate, I can confirm this is pretty accurate. I lateraled to a better firm after 3 years at Shearman. Midlevels there tend to mostly lateral up or go in-house. Those that get fired or stealthed as a first or second year have very limited options.
How often does stealthing go down, that multiple posters are discussing it?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”