Which firm is better in life science patent law practice?
Which firm has better firm culture, promotion opportunities, etc?
Any thought is greatly appreciated.
Morgan Lewis vs WSGR Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
the lsat failure
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:26 pm
Re: Morgan Lewis vs WSGR
I think WSGR wins here by a mile; valley firms dominate the life sciences practice area, particularly for early-stage/startup companies. Can't comment on culture and promotion opportunities, but it seems like WSGR tends to promote a good amount of insiders to Partner each year.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432577
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Morgan Lewis vs WSGR
Yeah Morgan Lewis is a non-player in this market & practice. Easy pick for WSGRthe lsat failure wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 11:01 pmI think WSGR wins here by a mile; valley firms dominate the life sciences practice area, particularly for early-stage/startup companies. Can't comment on culture and promotion opportunities, but it seems like WSGR tends to promote a good amount of insiders to Partner each year.
