Orrick's "Unplug Time" - and non-$$$ benefits Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
kovdak02

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri May 22, 2020 2:23 pm

Orrick's "Unplug Time" - and non-$$$ benefits

Post by kovdak02 » Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:58 pm

Check out this ATL story: https://abovethelaw.com/2021/03/top-50- ... ff-policy/

Orrick is essentially creating a new category of PTO called "Unplug Time" during which associates (and partners!) are not supposed to check email, take calls, or do any work. 40 hours a year, and they count toward bonus eligibility. Interested to hear from folks at Orrick how this goes and if it actually works.

I think top firms could get a lot of bonus points from associates for pursuing similar policies. Unfortunately, I think most partners would rather hand out larger special bonuses than commit to giving their teams any sort of real time off. As we all know, the 24/7/365 nature of being on call is one of (if not the) worst parts of the job. Even one week guaranteed to be free from that would be tremendous.

I also see Orrick is formally discouraging non-time sensitive meetings on Friday afternoon as well, which strikes me as something perhaps difficult to implement but also in the right vein of finding non-monetary ways to help associates survive the job.

Hope to see some other firms follow, but I expect their attention will be only on the DPW special bonuses rather than both this and that.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Orrick's "Unplug Time" - and non-$$$ benefits

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:28 am

I just don’t see how this works unless the business model changes. It’s just like vacation, which is supposed to be unplug time. It’s not like you can cash it in whenever you want, it has to be negotiated, if your team is decent then they’ll respect it. But if something blows up you’re expected to put your job first. I don’t see how this is any different.

kovdak02

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri May 22, 2020 2:23 pm

Re: Orrick's "Unplug Time" - and non-$$$ benefits

Post by kovdak02 » Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:47 am

The difference as I see it (from outside Orrick) is that if I took an “Unplug Time” vacation, I wouldn’t bring my work laptop and I’d turn off notifications on my Mail phone app. On a “normal” vacation now, I’m looking at both of those probably twice a day.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432497
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Orrick's "Unplug Time" - and non-$$$ benefits

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:03 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:28 am
I just don’t see how this works unless the business model changes. It’s just like vacation, which is supposed to be unplug time. It’s not like you can cash it in whenever you want, it has to be negotiated, if your team is decent then they’ll respect it. But if something blows up you’re expected to put your job first. I don’t see how this is any different.
Even then, you risk damages. My vacation was “cleared” in sense other associate said my work was covered and team okayed it. I told the other associate I could do whatever on my vacation. I was never asked to do a thing (admittedly did not volunteer after I left), and when matter blew up while I was gone, found out the other associate threw me under the bus hard. Was eventually taken off matter but reviews and bonus were unaffected, so net win.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”