Kramer Levin v. Milbank v. White and Case (Bankruptcy) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432375
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Kramer Levin v. Milbank v. White and Case (Bankruptcy)
I am looking for a good work life balance and I am OK with doing mostly creditor work. I'm looking for a firm with a collegial atmosphere that's conducive to longevity. Of these three which would you say is the best?
-
- Posts: 432375
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kramer Levin v. Milbank v. White and Case (Bankruptcy)
I can’t speak to all of these, but there’s not a chance I would want to work for Tom Lauria.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:09 pm
Re: Kramer Levin v. Milbank v. White and Case (Bankruptcy)
Given what you've stated there is no question it's Milbank. I have friends at Milbank Rx, and they did get worked over this summer but Milbank is generally a pretty humane place to work and is financially extremely healthy.
-
- Posts: 432375
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kramer Levin v. Milbank v. White and Case (Bankruptcy)
Thanks all. Is Kramer not a good place? The people I spoke to there seemed happy. They also look good financially. So from what I gather it's Milbank > Kramer > W&C?
-
- Posts: 432375
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kramer Levin v. Milbank v. White and Case (Bankruptcy)
My impression of Kramer is that they mostly do UCC-type reps. I haven't heard anything bad about them, but I wouldn't want to go there unless I was into official committee work.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:42 pmThanks all. Is Kramer not a good place? The people I spoke to there seemed happy. They also look good financially. So from what I gather it's Milbank > Kramer > W&C?
Also, the reason people shit on White & Case is not that it's a weak group (it's not) or that the people in it are unhappy (they may or may not be, I don't know), it's because Tom Lauria is perhaps the biggest bomb thrower in RX right now and is almost universally hated. And given that White & Case RX is pretty much the Tom Lauria Show, that extends to everyone else at White & Case RX as well.
Some people might find that appealing.
All that aside, Milbank is unquestionably the best option here for the generic RX junior who doesn't have a specific niche interest. It is neck and neck with DPW and PW as a top creditor shop and does some debtor reps.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432375
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kramer Levin v. Milbank v. White and Case (Bankruptcy)
100% start at Milbank. If you hate it, you can go somewhere else
-
- Posts: 432375
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kramer Levin v. Milbank v. White and Case (Bankruptcy)
Milbank for sure. Kramer fine too.