Kirkland (CHI) vs. Top Regional Firm Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Kirkland (CHI) vs. Top Regional Firm

Kirkland
7
70%
Regional
3
30%
 
Total votes: 10
Anonymous User
Posts: 431707
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Kirkland (CHI) vs. Top Regional Firm

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:59 pm

Please help! Kirkland's Chicago office vs. a non-market paying regional firm in the South that is *actually* a lifestyle firm. I'm incredibly torn.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 431707
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland (CHI) vs. Top Regional Firm

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Feb 02, 2021 3:44 pm

Ask yourself this: Do you want to be in the South longterm. If the location of the firm is where you want to be go there. If not, go to Kirkland.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 431707
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland (CHI) vs. Top Regional Firm

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:46 pm

Every question like this comes down, at bottom, to where you want to practice law long-term and your level of interest in working biglaw.
Top
Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”