Did not expect to get both offers, and am seeking advice on opinions/factors to consider. I'm lit all the way.
Would prefer not to say which offices, but not Boston or CA. Thank you for any input!
Ropes v. O'Melveny Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432785
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ropes v. O'Melveny
O'MelvenyAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 2:16 amDid not expect to get both offers, and am seeking advice on opinions/factors to consider. I'm lit all the way.
Would prefer not to say which offices, but not Boston or CA. Thank you for any input!
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432785
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ropes v. O'Melveny
Since you want lit O’Melveny. If you wanted corporate, the other way around.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432785
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ropes v. O'Melveny
Ooo say more please!Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:25 amO'MelvenyAnonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 2:16 amDid not expect to get both offers, and am seeking advice on opinions/factors to consider. I'm lit all the way.
Would prefer not to say which offices, but not Boston or CA. Thank you for any input!
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432785
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Ropes v. O'Melveny
To be fair, the Ropes office I'm looking at is very litigation-heavy. What makes you prefer O'Melveny's litigation practice?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:18 amSince you want lit O’Melveny. If you wanted corporate, the other way around.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
