Cooley v. Goodwin (SF and Silicon Valley)? Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Cooley v. Goodwin (SF and Silicon Valley)?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jan 09, 2021 9:28 pm

I would like some insight and a comparison of the cultures, pay down the road, work-life balance, financial health of the offices (possibility of layoffs), work culture (facetime), and breadth of work for their California practices.

I want to work with emerging tech companies (startups) as well as Big Tech companies. I know Cooley has a stronger reputation on the West Coast, but besides that, what would make one choose to work at that firm over Goodwin in NoCal? I'm focused on corporate, tech transactions, and IP work within the tech and biotech industry. Diversity and being supported in that respect is also important to me.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Cooley v. Goodwin (SF and Silicon Valley)?

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 10, 2021 1:01 am

I would say Cooley is stronger on the west coast in all practice areas except PE.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432547
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Cooley v. Goodwin (SF and Silicon Valley)?

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 10, 2021 1:41 pm

Agree that Cooley is generally stronger. Goodwin pulled some really sketchy stealth layoffs during Covid (and then promptly hit the lateral market to try to plug the holes for whatever reason) so I would tread carefully.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”