How bad is this? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
How bad is this?
.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sat Dec 12, 2020 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:41 pm
Re: How bad is this?
Common question to ask especially if you didn’t copy the mid level, he just wanted to know if he was reading fourth year or first year work product as it’s typically the difference between reviewing quickly and re-writing (depending on the document). You should generally send to the mid level before the senior
- lolwutpar
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 4:13 pm
Re: How bad is this?
Did he email you directly to do the assignment and not copy the midlevel? Usually you'd route stuff through the midlevel when you're that junior or at least ask the midlevel if they want to review.
For me, if an M&A deal was a senior, midlevel and junior, I wouldn't expect the junior to be sending work product directly to the senior unless it was blessed by the midlevel.
For me, if an M&A deal was a senior, midlevel and junior, I wouldn't expect the junior to be sending work product directly to the senior unless it was blessed by the midlevel.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: How bad is this?
Noted on the bold. He actually asked the question post-review, as far as I can tell (because the comments came in fairly quickly after the question), so the purpose seemed to be more evaluative. They are in the process of collecting end of year supervisor reviews right now (not for stubs), so I guess it would make sense to want to know whether it was the fourth year's work product.FormerChild wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:24 pmCommon question to ask especially if you didn’t copy the mid level, he just wanted to know if he was reading fourth year or first year work product as it’s typically the difference between reviewing quickly and re-writing (depending on the document). You should generally send to the mid level before the senior
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: How bad is this?
Trying not to give too many details, but the senior communicated the assignment to me directly because the midlevel was out of pocket for a few days. I had time to have the midlevel review once they returned, but I just didn't want to put extra work on their plate.lolwutpar wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:25 pmDid he email you directly to do the assignment and not copy the midlevel? Usually you'd route stuff through the midlevel when you're that junior or at least ask the midlevel if they want to review.
For me, if an M&A deal was a senior, midlevel and junior, I wouldn't expect the junior to be sending work product directly to the senior unless it was blessed by the midlevel.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lolwutpar
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 4:13 pm
Re: How bad is this?
Then I wouldn't have expected the midlevel to review. Odd that they asked.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:31 pmTrying not to give too many details, but the senior communicated the assignment to me directly because the midlevel was out of pocket for a few days.lolwutpar wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:25 pmDid he email you directly to do the assignment and not copy the midlevel? Usually you'd route stuff through the midlevel when you're that junior or at least ask the midlevel if they want to review.
For me, if an M&A deal was a senior, midlevel and junior, I wouldn't expect the junior to be sending work product directly to the senior unless it was blessed by the midlevel.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: How bad is this?
They returned in time for them to have conceivably reviewed it, though. They just weren't around when it was assigned initially.lolwutpar wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:32 pmThen I wouldn't have expected the midlevel to review. Odd that they asked.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:31 pmTrying not to give too many details, but the senior communicated the assignment to me directly because the midlevel was out of pocket for a few days.lolwutpar wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:25 pmDid he email you directly to do the assignment and not copy the midlevel? Usually you'd route stuff through the midlevel when you're that junior or at least ask the midlevel if they want to review.
For me, if an M&A deal was a senior, midlevel and junior, I wouldn't expect the junior to be sending work product directly to the senior unless it was blessed by the midlevel.
- lolwutpar
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 4:13 pm
Re: How bad is this?
Eh, doesn't change my answer. Doesn't sound like the midlevel was in the loop. Generally, I'd route through the midlevel, but not in this situation.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:33 pmThey returned in time for them to have conceivably reviewed it, though. They just weren't around when it was assigned initially.lolwutpar wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:32 pmThen I wouldn't have expected the midlevel to review. Odd that they asked.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:31 pmTrying not to give too many details, but the senior communicated the assignment to me directly because the midlevel was out of pocket for a few days.lolwutpar wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:25 pmDid he email you directly to do the assignment and not copy the midlevel? Usually you'd route stuff through the midlevel when you're that junior or at least ask the midlevel if they want to review.
For me, if an M&A deal was a senior, midlevel and junior, I wouldn't expect the junior to be sending work product directly to the senior unless it was blessed by the midlevel.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:06 pm
Re: How bad is this?
Maybe they thought you did such a good job that it must have been from someone more experienced.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: How bad is this?
I thought maybe there was a slight chance, but then I saw the mistakes, at least one of which showed pretty bad attention to detail (think page numbers/headers being messed up). There were some things I caught that I think maybe the senior wasn't expecting me to, but idk if it outweighed the bad.LawrenceGazebo wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:41 pmMaybe they thought you did such a good job that it must have been from someone more experienced.
Oh well. Guess I'll never know.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: How bad is this?
In all events, this doesn’t seem like a big deal at all. Chin up
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: How bad is this?
Thanks, I feel a lot better. After thinking about it, seems most likely he just wanted to know whether to send his feedback to both of us.RaceJudicata wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 11:29 pmIn all events, this doesn’t seem like a big deal at all. Chin up
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login