Partner v. Associate Pay Cuts Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432574
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Partner v. Associate Pay Cuts
I'm at a firm that has cut associate pay and has supposedly cut partner withdrawals significantly more; however, we've had significant associate attrition (think 50% of associates in some offices leaving) but no partners leaving. This smells fishy. The firm's message has consistently been that partners are carrying the brunt of the load, with withdrawals amounting to ~50% reduction depending on their level. Is this reasonably suspect? I'd expect partners to carry their clients to a different firm if this were true since associates have been migrating to greener pastures en mass. Is there any legal/contractual obligation to transparency here, or can they misrepresent compensation structure with no recourse?
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:14 am
Re: Partner v. Associate Pay Cuts
They can do whatever the fuck they want when it comes to messaging towards associates, unfortunately.
-
- Posts: 432574
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Partner v. Associate Pay Cuts
I don’t know that the logic behind the assumption that partners would take clients to other firms based on cuts to their take really works, since presumably the partners are the ones deciding what will happen to their payments, while associates are stuck with what the partners decide. Plus a partner has bought in monetarily and I think deciding to leave and take your clients elsewhere is more complicated than an associate picking up and moving.
That said, I’m absolutely not vouching for the truth of the cuts they’re dealing with. Can’t imagine there’s any way to know that.
That said, I’m absolutely not vouching for the truth of the cuts they’re dealing with. Can’t imagine there’s any way to know that.
-
- Posts: 432574
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Partner v. Associate Pay Cuts
Very few partners actually have a say in how much money they get. It’s up to the exec committee or policy committee or whatever small group of partners a particular firm uses for such decisions.nixy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 6:02 pmI don’t know that the logic behind the assumption that partners would take clients to other firms based on cuts to their take really works, since presumably the partners are the ones deciding what will happen to their payments, while associates are stuck with what the partners decide. Plus a partner has bought in monetarily and I think deciding to leave and take your clients elsewhere is more complicated than an associate picking up and moving.
That said, I’m absolutely not vouching for the truth of the cuts they’re dealing with. Can’t imagine there’s any way to know that.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login