Fall bonuses Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- nahumya
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:49 pm
Fall bonuses
Looks like fall bonuses might be coming:
https://abovethelaw.com/2020/09/wow-dav ... n-bonuses/
https://abovethelaw.com/2020/09/cooley-bonuses/
https://abovethelaw.com/2020/09/wow-dav ... n-bonuses/
https://abovethelaw.com/2020/09/cooley-bonuses/
- 4LTsPointingNorth
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:17 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Is there any consensus on what "in good standing" generally means at firms, particularly ones without published hours requirements? Are associate made aware that they are not in good standing?Domestic associates in good standing will be receiving special Fall bonuses in recognition of their hard work
- nahumya
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:49 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
I'm guessing this is meant to exclude those associates who were given 3 months to find a new firm.4LTsPointingNorth wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 6:08 pmIs there any consensus on what "in good standing" generally means at firms, particularly ones without published hours requirements? Are associate made aware that they are not in good standing?Domestic associates in good standing will be receiving special Fall bonuses in recognition of their hard work
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Any other news? Havent heard anything from PW.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:02 am
Re: Fall bonuses
I have a feeling it will be a few days and I wouldn't panic if no matches this week. Pre-Covid the top firms had approval from their committees to match whatever a set list of competitors (which would obviously include DPW for the top places) threw out there. I doubt that pre-approval is likely to still be open, so committees are going to have to discuss next Monday or whenever they meet. But just because it's not automatic doesn't mean it won't happen.
Cravaths and other heavy hitters like Milbank will match or even go over the top (we can dream). Nationwide places like K&E and Latham that are doing just fine in 2020 can't be the ones who don't play along and all of the sudden this is widespread among the top ~20 or so firms by PPP / RPL.
Nobody can write off DPW like those clowns at Gunderson or Cooley. Congratulations friends, we've made it. Buy your kid some potatoes.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Anecdotally some PW partners in my group dont think it’s necessary to match but agree with others that ultimately the firm will have to once our other peers follow suit. Just need 1-2 to start the dominoes
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:01 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
I do wonder how this will be handled by firms with high RPL but low vault rankings (like Dechert, Schulte, Cahill). Does this further stratify the rankings? Or do lower ranked firms try to catch up by playing with the big boys?MillllerTime wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:36 pmI have a feeling it will be a few days and I wouldn't panic if no matches this week. Pre-Covid the top firms had approval from their committees to match whatever a set list of competitors (which would obviously include DPW for the top places) threw out there. I doubt that pre-approval is likely to still be open, so committees are going to have to discuss next Monday or whenever they meet. But just because it's not automatic doesn't mean it won't happen.
Cravaths and other heavy hitters like Milbank will match or even go over the top (we can dream). Nationwide places like K&E and Latham that are doing just fine in 2020 can't be the ones who don't play along and all of the sudden this is widespread among the top ~20 or so firms by PPP / RPL.
Nobody can write off DPW like those clowns at Gunderson or Cooley. Congratulations friends, we've made it. Buy your kid some potatoes.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
I don’t see how Weil doesn’t match given the hours over there since the pandemic. Have to imagine they’re having retention issues at least in Bk and the supporting groups
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:32 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
I'd expect there will be a lot of stratification on this, with some high-revenue firms matching outright, some firms matching but imposing hours requirements, and many firms not matching at all.
Total comp for a fifth-year associate is hitting $280k (base) + 32,500 (fall) + 80,000 (expected end-year) = $392,500. That is kinda insane. The great majority of V100 firms are not going to be able to afford it.
Total comp for a fifth-year associate is hitting $280k (base) + 32,500 (fall) + 80,000 (expected end-year) = $392,500. That is kinda insane. The great majority of V100 firms are not going to be able to afford it.
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
I would agree. I’m at a lower v100 and I don’t think anyone expects an outright match. Firms are already down in revenue. This will certainly be tied to hours or tiered in some way.Pulsar wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:08 pmI'd expect there will be a lot of stratification on this, with some high-revenue firms matching outright, some firms matching but imposing hours requirements, and many firms not matching at all.
Total comp for a fifth-year associate is hitting $280k (base) + 32,500 (fall) + 80,000 (expected end-year) = $392,500. That is kinda insane. The great majority of V100 firms are not going to be able to afford it.
- nahumya
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:49 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
If this fifth-year bills 2000 hours at, say, $650/hour, that's $1.3m/year for the firm. Sure, you have to subtract realization and overhead, but there is plenty left over to give this associate $400k. The comp is all relative to how much money lawyers generate, which makes it less insane.Pulsar wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:08 pmI'd expect there will be a lot of stratification on this, with some high-revenue firms matching outright, some firms matching but imposing hours requirements, and many firms not matching at all.
Total comp for a fifth-year associate is hitting $280k (base) + 32,500 (fall) + 80,000 (expected end-year) = $392,500. That is kinda insane. The great majority of V100 firms are not going to be able to afford it.
-
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 11:55 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Agreed and let’s be real, at the firms that are considering matching this, 5th years aren’t billed out at $650 anymore. Closer to $1000.nahumya wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:56 pmIf this fifth-year bills 2000 hours at, say, $650/hour, that's $1.3m/year for the firm. Sure, you have to subtract realization and overhead, but there is plenty left over to give this associate $400k. The comp is all relative to how much money lawyers generate, which makes it less insane.Pulsar wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:08 pmI'd expect there will be a lot of stratification on this, with some high-revenue firms matching outright, some firms matching but imposing hours requirements, and many firms not matching at all.
Total comp for a fifth-year associate is hitting $280k (base) + 32,500 (fall) + 80,000 (expected end-year) = $392,500. That is kinda insane. The great majority of V100 firms are not going to be able to afford it.
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
At a >V50 firm and would be surprised if no match. Firm has touted revenue and being generally up-and-to-the-right y/y. Associate compensation is increasing commensurately with the increase in revenue and proportionate decrease in equity holders.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:11 pmI would agree. I’m at a lower v100 and I don’t think anyone expects an outright match. Firms are already down in revenue. This will certainly be tied to hours or tiered in some way.Pulsar wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:08 pmI'd expect there will be a lot of stratification on this, with some high-revenue firms matching outright, some firms matching but imposing hours requirements, and many firms not matching at all.
Total comp for a fifth-year associate is hitting $280k (base) + 32,500 (fall) + 80,000 (expected end-year) = $392,500. That is kinda insane. The great majority of V100 firms are not going to be able to afford it.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Ultramar vistas wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:15 amAgreed and let’s be real, at the firms that are considering matching this, 5th years aren’t billed out at $650 anymore. Closer to $1000.nahumya wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:56 pmIf this fifth-year bills 2000 hours at, say, $650/hour, that's $1.3m/year for the firm. Sure, you have to subtract realization and overhead, but there is plenty left over to give this associate $400k. The comp is all relative to how much money lawyers generate, which makes it less insane.Pulsar wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:08 pmI'd expect there will be a lot of stratification on this, with some high-revenue firms matching outright, some firms matching but imposing hours requirements, and many firms not matching at all.
Total comp for a fifth-year associate is hitting $280k (base) + 32,500 (fall) + 80,000 (expected end-year) = $392,500. That is kinda insane. The great majority of V100 firms are not going to be able to afford it.
Yeah rates have gone way up. I’m a 4th year billing at $900+/hr, which is insane and will pull in $2.5mm revenue for the firm this year annualized. They can cough up $400k in exchange for literally every single one of my waking moments
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Yes, I'm a 5th year and billed out at exactly $1000. So $2m for 2000 hours. Insane.Ultramar vistas wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:15 amAgreed and let’s be real, at the firms that are considering matching this, 5th years aren’t billed out at $650 anymore. Closer to $1000.nahumya wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:56 pmIf this fifth-year bills 2000 hours at, say, $650/hour, that's $1.3m/year for the firm. Sure, you have to subtract realization and overhead, but there is plenty left over to give this associate $400k. The comp is all relative to how much money lawyers generate, which makes it less insane.Pulsar wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:08 pmI'd expect there will be a lot of stratification on this, with some high-revenue firms matching outright, some firms matching but imposing hours requirements, and many firms not matching at all.
Total comp for a fifth-year associate is hitting $280k (base) + 32,500 (fall) + 80,000 (expected end-year) = $392,500. That is kinda insane. The great majority of V100 firms are not going to be able to afford it.
-
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
It’s worth noting that most attorneys aren’t billing out at their rack rate - probably something more like 80% of advertised rate and, of that, 80% is collected, even for good attorneys at top firms.
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
I mean we say firms that “match” but a lot of firms have not even completely rolled back pay cuts... so I may get another make hole payment but it is really the have abs have nots.nahumya wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:43 pmLooks like fall bonuses might be coming:
https://abovethelaw.com/2020/09/wow-dav ... n-bonuses/
https://abovethelaw.com/2020/09/cooley-bonuses/
Just to note, firms with large bankruptcy practices are getting the rack rate for in court repesentations.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
In scenarios like this do firms like Cooley come around to meeting the market? Seems bad for morale.
- parkslope
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:00 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
Revenue per lawyer is a pretty good estimate: https://www.statista.com/statistics/878 ... ed-states/
Davis Polk revenue per lawyer is $1.48 million, and that is realized revenue, not notional billing rate.
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
I’m a PW 5th year. How are you talking about bonuses with partners? Some partners have told you they don’t think its necessary to match compensation? Sounds pretty tacky.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:51 pmAnecdotally some PW partners in my group dont think it’s necessary to match but agree with others that ultimately the firm will have to once our other peers follow suit. Just need 1-2 to start the dominoes
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
Didn't have the conversation directly but another senior took a shot and asked the question. Agree the comment is tacky lolAnonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:55 amI’m a PW 5th year. How are you talking about bonuses with partners? Some partners have told you they don’t think its necessary to match compensation? Sounds pretty tacky.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:51 pmAnecdotally some PW partners in my group dont think it’s necessary to match but agree with others that ultimately the firm will have to once our other peers follow suit. Just need 1-2 to start the dominoes
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
My money is that either Simpson or Milbank match first. Cravath goes 3rd once it's clear no one is beating it.
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
I think they have to match if V20 matches, though likely with hours requirements.collegewriter wrote: ↑Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:54 pmI do wonder how this will be handled by firms with high RPL but low vault rankings (like Dechert, Schulte, Cahill). Does this further stratify the rankings? Or do lower ranked firms try to catch up by playing with the big boys?
- nahumya
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:49 pm
Re: Fall bonuses
Milbank it is.DoveBodyWash wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:14 amMy money is that either Simpson or Milbank match first. Cravath goes 3rd once it's clear no one is beating it.
-
- Posts: 432428
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Fall bonuses
From other thread -- let's be clear, Milbank is leading.nahumya wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:33 pmMilbank it is.DoveBodyWash wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:14 amMy money is that either Simpson or Milbank match first. Cravath goes 3rd once it's clear no one is beating it.
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:13 pmMilbank here - the above anon failed to point out that if your utilization is above 110% then you get 1.5x DPW scale
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login