Wilson Sonsini litigation Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432854
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:34 am

Current midlevel/senior associate considering a lateral move to an East Coast Wilson Sonsini office to do litigation. Would appreciate any info on culture, composition of litigation work, compensation, benefits, partnership prospects, turnover, up-or-out mentality, exit ops, etc. Offhand I have heard that it is heavily siloed, can be a sweatshop, and that the firm pinches pennies.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432854
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:45 am

Anonymous User wrote:Current midlevel/senior associate considering a lateral move to an East Coast Wilson Sonsini office to do litigation. Would appreciate any info on culture, composition of litigation work, compensation, benefits, partnership prospects, turnover, up-or-out mentality, exit ops, etc. Offhand I have heard that it is heavily siloed, can be a sweatshop, and that the firm pinches pennies.
I interviewed at WSGR D.C. a few years ago. (No sour grapes, I received an offer.) Most of the people I met, including all of the counsels/partners I met, seemed genuinely nice, and the hours seemed to be roughly as bad as, but not worse than, other BigLaw shops (i.e., it's not a "lifestyle firm" and you shouldn't expect lighter/secondary-market hours). But I also encountered some surprisingly offputting behavior from a few of the associates - not sure if it was some kind of mind game/hazing ritual or if they were genuine jerks. That was mainly what put me off.

At least at the time, the "dinner" for working late consisted of pizza; and to get access to the free pizza you had to have clocked a pretty high number of hours that day (IIRC 8 billables, so too bad if you spent half the day doing nonbillable work or if you had a light day that unexpectedly blew up late in the afternoon). That seemed pretty lame to me, but maybe it's changed now.

Major caveat, some or all of the above may not apply to WSGR NYC/Boston.

LBJ's Hair

Silver
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:17 pm

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by LBJ's Hair » Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:54 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:At least at the time, the "dinner" for working late consisted of pizza; and to get access to the free pizza you had to have clocked a pretty high number of hours that day (IIRC 8 billables, so too bad if you spent half the day doing nonbillable work or if you had a light day that unexpectedly blew up late in the afternoon). That seemed pretty lame to me, but maybe it's changed now.

Major caveat, some or all of the above may not apply to WSGR NYC/Boston.
This is extremely weird, think we all really want details here lol

Are you only allowed to expense "pizza" as a category of food? So if I Seamless from Larry Lasagna's Italian, I can expense pizza but not spaghetti? Or would the office would just order pizza in and to get a slice you had to give a client code? Or did they have a cafeteria that exclusively made pizza? Or?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432854
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 03, 2019 12:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Current midlevel/senior associate considering a lateral move to an East Coast Wilson Sonsini office to do litigation. Would appreciate any info on culture, composition of litigation work, compensation, benefits, partnership prospects, turnover, up-or-out mentality, exit ops, etc. Offhand I have heard that it is heavily siloed, can be a sweatshop, and that the firm pinches pennies.
Their antitrust group at DC office is great though there are some weird folks in other groups. Many of other litigation attorneys are at NY office though. Now they are using seamless (you can order up to $25 if you work past 7pm) so don't worry about pizza stuff.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432854
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:06 pm

LBJ's Hair wrote:This is extremely weird, think we all really want details here lol

Are you only allowed to expense "pizza" as a category of food? So if I Seamless from Larry Lasagna's Italian, I can expense pizza but not spaghetti? Or would the office would just order pizza in and to get a slice you had to give a client code? Or did they have a cafeteria that exclusively made pizza? Or?
Pizza anon above. I was told the office would order pizza in, and to get a slice you had to sign in on a sheet. You were required to have billed 8 hours total that day (not entirely clear whether you had to have already billed 8 hours before getting pizza or if you just needed to bill 8 total before heading home that night). I think the pizza expense was just swallowed by the firm (hence the billable requirement to make sure people didn't "abuse" it).

Glad to hear they've moved to Seamless now.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Elston Gunn

Gold
Posts: 3820
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by Elston Gunn » Thu Oct 03, 2019 7:22 pm

Pizza anon, thank you. Can we have some more details? You say “a slice.” Were you only allowed one slice? Could you get a second if you billed 10 hours? What if they ran out? What kind of pizza? Dominos? Something a bit fancier? Toppings?

Thanks in advance.

The Lsat Airbender

Gold
Posts: 1801
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:34 pm

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by The Lsat Airbender » Fri Oct 04, 2019 11:07 am

Elston Gunn wrote:Pizza anon, thank you. Can we have some more details? You say “a slice.” Were you only allowed one slice? Could you get a second if you billed 10 hours? What if they ran out? What kind of pizza? Dominos? Something a bit fancier? Toppings?

Thanks in advance.

- pathern wondering how he can implement this at his own firm

BlackAndOrange84

Bronze
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:06 am

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by BlackAndOrange84 » Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:36 pm

I am so sad this thread petered out. WSG pizza content is best content.

LBJ's Hair

Silver
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:17 pm

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by LBJ's Hair » Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:45 pm

Bumping for Pizza Anon. Lot of potential here, please don't let us down

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432854
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Oct 04, 2019 4:27 pm

OP here. I too would appreciate any additional information about WSGR, including its past pizza program. Thanks to all who have chimed in so far.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432854
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Oct 04, 2019 4:34 pm

Pizza anon again. Afraid I don't have too many more details. I declined my offer so no firsthand experience, only what the associates told me. I assume you could have more than one slice. They said the pizza didn't really run out, but there was a real risk of it going cold and inedible if you didn't get it right when it was delivered. Not sure which restaurant they used. The pizza was supposedly pretty basic, there would be cheese pizza and maybe one or two varieties with toppings. Wasn't like, high-end pizza or anything. But the associates said you grew to appreciate it because it was free.

LBJ's Hair

Silver
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:17 pm

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by LBJ's Hair » Sat Oct 05, 2019 12:12 pm

Anonymous User wrote: But the associates said you grew to appreciate [the pizza] because it was free.
But it is different . . . when the suffering is imposed by those who are supposed to love you, whom you are supposed to love. Then there is no escape, then you must learn to love the lash, and then there are no noble examples to follow; there is no nobility at all.

User avatar
BeeTeeZ

Bronze
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:26 am

Re: Wilson Sonsini litigation

Post by BeeTeeZ » Sat Oct 05, 2019 3:39 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Pizza anon again. Afraid I don't have too many more details. I declined my offer so no firsthand experience, only what the associates told me. I assume you could have more than one slice. They said the pizza didn't really run out, but there was a real risk of it going cold and inedible if you didn't get it right when it was delivered. Not sure which restaurant they used. The pizza was supposedly pretty basic, there would be cheese pizza and maybe one or two varieties with toppings. Wasn't like, high-end pizza or anything. But the associates said you grew to appreciate it because it was free.
Somehow this seems worse than not getting free pizza.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”