SRZ vs cadwalader? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
scho
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 1:14 pm
SRZ vs cadwalader?
Ny. For corporate.
Last edited by QContinuum on Tue Aug 27, 2019 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SRZ vs cadwalader?
SRZ and it isn't close. I've worked in Cadwalader's corporate/transactional group and CWT has a serious talent retention and culture problem. There's a reason why they pay bonuses in February. I also worked harder than my friends at other firms, especially on weekends/late nights/holidays. Cadwalader also doesn't do typical corporate work (the M&A group does mostly shareholder activism, which is miserable work and the Capital Markets group doesn't do traditional capital markets work).
-
QContinuum
- Posts: 3594
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:52 am
Re: SRZ vs cadwalader?
The same OP anon (scho) who's allegedly currently agonizing between whether to join SRZ or Cadwalader also authored the hit piece on SRZ at http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... #p10401563.
This is blatant bad-faith behavior. The poster has been warned and outed, and both threads will be locked.
This is blatant bad-faith behavior. The poster has been warned and outed, and both threads will be locked.
